You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Jean-Daniel Cryans (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/03/16 00:37:30 UTC
[jira] Updated: (HBASE-3650) HBA.delete can return too fast
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jean-Daniel Cryans updated HBASE-3650:
--------------------------------------
Attachment: HBASE-3650.patch
This patch adds a new utility in MetaReader to configure a Scan that only reads the rows from a single table, then refactors both HBA and MetaReader to use it. Finally it adds a test to make sure the method is getting the right rows from .META.
> HBA.delete can return too fast
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-3650
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3650
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.90.1
> Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
> Assignee: Jean-Daniel Cryans
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.90.2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-3650.patch
>
>
> One of our engineers got a weird TableExistsException in his code and I see that the client-side logging says the table was deleted in less than a second while it took the master 5 seconds to do it. Doing code inspection, the .META. scanner in HBA.delete can set _found_ to _true_ and then set it back to _false_ in the case where the deleted table isn't the last one. We should just do a scan that would get the rows specific to the table instead of scanning *all* the rows.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira