You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@skywalking.apache.org by dafang <13...@163.com> on 2020/06/29 09:24:05 UTC
A question for Instance monitor param
Hi Dev team:
I have a question on Instance monitor param,such as jvm_mem,cpu and so on.
I have read the source code for this data collected,and I found that the instance param is from mxbean.But when I use different jdk product,such as oracle_jdk,zing etc.May the param is not correct.
Is this have a resolution?
Wait for your reply
dafang
2020.06.29
Re: Re: A question for Instance monitor param
Posted by Sheng Wu <wu...@gmail.com>.
I think that is the JVM implementation issue. I am not using that JVM, but
MXBean(such as java.lang.management.MemoryUsage) is the official and
standard way to get this.
If you want to change, feel free to change the source codes.
It is not hard. I am not sure what your issue is. Other APM, most likely
commercial product, is not our concern.
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108
dafang <13...@163.com> 于2020年6月29日周一 下午5:46写道：
>
>
>
> For example,
> When I use oracle_jdk,and I collect jvm_mem by mxbean,And I got
> jvm_mem_max is 400M.But when I use zing,and I collect jvm_mem by
> mxbean,problely I will got null or a wrong value.This happens on my old APM
> products.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 在 2020-06-29 17:31:19，"Sheng Wu" <wu...@gmail.com> 写道：
> >Hi
> >
> >What do you mean MBean is not right? MBean is based on JVM specification.
> >I am confusing.
> >
> >Sheng Wu 吴晟
> >Twitter, wusheng1108
> >
> >
> >dafang <13...@163.com> 于2020年6月29日周一 下午5:24写道：
> >
> >> Hi Dev team:
> >> I have a question on Instance monitor param,such as jvm_mem,cpu and so
> on.
> >> I have read the source code for this data collected,and I found that the
> >> instance param is from mxbean.But when I use different jdk product,such
> as
> >> oracle_jdk,zing etc.May the param is not correct.
> >> Is this have a resolution?
> >>
> >>
> >> Wait for your reply
> >> dafang
> >> 2020.06.29
>
Re:Re: A question for Instance monitor param
Posted by dafang <13...@163.com>.
For example,
When I use oracle_jdk,and I collect jvm_mem by mxbean,And I got jvm_mem_max is 400M.But when I use zing,and I collect jvm_mem by mxbean,problely I will got null or a wrong value.This happens on my old APM products.
在 2020-06-29 17:31:19，"Sheng Wu" <wu...@gmail.com> 写道：
>Hi
>
>What do you mean MBean is not right? MBean is based on JVM specification.
>I am confusing.
>
>Sheng Wu 吴晟
>Twitter, wusheng1108
>
>
>dafang <13...@163.com> 于2020年6月29日周一 下午5:24写道：
>
>> Hi Dev team:
>> I have a question on Instance monitor param,such as jvm_mem,cpu and so on.
>> I have read the source code for this data collected,and I found that the
>> instance param is from mxbean.But when I use different jdk product,such as
>> oracle_jdk,zing etc.May the param is not correct.
>> Is this have a resolution?
>>
>>
>> Wait for your reply
>> dafang
>> 2020.06.29
Re: A question for Instance monitor param
Posted by Sheng Wu <wu...@gmail.com>.
Hi
What do you mean MBean is not right? MBean is based on JVM specification.
I am confusing.
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108
dafang <13...@163.com> 于2020年6月29日周一 下午5:24写道：
> Hi Dev team:
> I have a question on Instance monitor param,such as jvm_mem,cpu and so on.
> I have read the source code for this data collected,and I found that the
> instance param is from mxbean.But when I use different jdk product,such as
> oracle_jdk,zing etc.May the param is not correct.
> Is this have a resolution?
>
>
> Wait for your reply
> dafang
> 2020.06.29