You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-user@lucene.apache.org by testn <te...@doramail.com> on 2007/07/30 15:22:04 UTC
LUCENE-843 Release
Hi guys,
Do you think LUCENE-843 is stable enough? If so, do you think it's worth to
release it with probably LUCENE 2.2.1? It would be nice so that people can
take the advantage of it right away without risking other breaking changes
in the HEAD branch or waiting until 2.3 release.
Thanks,
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11863644
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: LUCENE-843 Release
Posted by testn <te...@doramail.com>.
Thanks! Will look forward to 2.3 then.
Michael McCandless-2 wrote:
>
>
> Honestly I don't really think this is a good idea.
>
> While LUCENE-843 has proven stable so far (knock on wood!), it is
> still a major change and I do worry (less with time :) that maybe I
> broke something subtle somewhere.
>
> While a few brave people have tested the trunk in their production
> worlds and seen good performance gains, that testing is still limited
> compared to a real release.
>
> A point release (2.4.1) really is not supposed to contain major
> changes, just bug fixes, and so I don't think we should violate that
> accepted practice.
>
> I would rather see us finish up 2.3 and release it, and going forwards
> do more frequent releases, instead of porting big changes back onto
> point releases.
>
> Mike
>
> "testn" <te...@doramail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Mike, as a committer, what do you think?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> Peter Keegan wrote:
>> >
>> > I've built a production index with this patch and done some query
>> stress
>> > testing with no problems.
>> > I'd give it a thumbs up.
>> >
>> > Peter
>> >
>> > On 7/30/07, testn <te...@doramail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi guys,
>> >>
>> >> Do you think LUCENE-843 is stable enough? If so, do you think it's
>> worth
>> >> to
>> >> release it with probably LUCENE 2.2.1? It would be nice so that people
>> >> can
>> >> take the advantage of it right away without risking other breaking
>> >> changes
>> >> in the HEAD branch or waiting until 2.3 release.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >> http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11863644
>> >> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11962690
>> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11963778
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: LUCENE-843 Release
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
Honestly I don't really think this is a good idea.
While LUCENE-843 has proven stable so far (knock on wood!), it is
still a major change and I do worry (less with time :) that maybe I
broke something subtle somewhere.
While a few brave people have tested the trunk in their production
worlds and seen good performance gains, that testing is still limited
compared to a real release.
A point release (2.4.1) really is not supposed to contain major
changes, just bug fixes, and so I don't think we should violate that
accepted practice.
I would rather see us finish up 2.3 and release it, and going forwards
do more frequent releases, instead of porting big changes back onto
point releases.
Mike
"testn" <te...@doramail.com> wrote:
>
> Mike, as a committer, what do you think?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Peter Keegan wrote:
> >
> > I've built a production index with this patch and done some query stress
> > testing with no problems.
> > I'd give it a thumbs up.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > On 7/30/07, testn <te...@doramail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> Do you think LUCENE-843 is stable enough? If so, do you think it's worth
> >> to
> >> release it with probably LUCENE 2.2.1? It would be nice so that people
> >> can
> >> take the advantage of it right away without risking other breaking
> >> changes
> >> in the HEAD branch or waiting until 2.3 release.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11863644
> >> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11962690
> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: LUCENE-843 Release
Posted by testn <te...@doramail.com>.
Mike, as a committer, what do you think?
Thanks!
Peter Keegan wrote:
>
> I've built a production index with this patch and done some query stress
> testing with no problems.
> I'd give it a thumbs up.
>
> Peter
>
> On 7/30/07, testn <te...@doramail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Do you think LUCENE-843 is stable enough? If so, do you think it's worth
>> to
>> release it with probably LUCENE 2.2.1? It would be nice so that people
>> can
>> take the advantage of it right away without risking other breaking
>> changes
>> in the HEAD branch or waiting until 2.3 release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11863644
>> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11962690
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: LUCENE-843 Release
Posted by Peter Keegan <pe...@gmail.com>.
I've built a production index with this patch and done some query stress
testing with no problems.
I'd give it a thumbs up.
Peter
On 7/30/07, testn <te...@doramail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Do you think LUCENE-843 is stable enough? If so, do you think it's worth
> to
> release it with probably LUCENE 2.2.1? It would be nice so that people can
> take the advantage of it right away without risking other breaking changes
> in the HEAD branch or waiting until 2.3 release.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11863644
> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>