Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

cpayne writes:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
> Thanks, guys the problem is that for SuSE 10.0 3.1.8 is the max, and the
> last time I update a 10.0 to the lastest everything broke. And the major
> thing for me that perl is still at 5.8.7, don't you have to be 5.8.8 or
> higher for the lastest stuff.

nope.

--j.

Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin

[cpayne <cp...@magigames.net>]

 I just got information from the open suse group where I can get 
3.2.3.11, I have update my spamassassin, and I am not getting those ugly 
errors, but I am still getting this one, which was drive me crazy before...

2.5 FM_NO_FROM_OR_TO       FM_NO_FROM_OR_TO
-0.0 NO_RECEIVED           Informational: message has no Received headers
 0.5 FM_NO_TO              FM_NO_TO

That was started me on this because it was creating a lot of false postives.  

Anyway thanks guys. 

Payne

Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin

[Matt Kettler <mk...@verizon.net>]

cpayne wrote:
>>  
> Cool I just found a source rpm and I am building 3.2.3.10 so hopefully
> this will help my issue thanks guys.
>
> By the way, I notices no one answer the part about the script.
You mean this one:
----------------------------------
If questions, anyone know of script that works with postfix logs that
looks at the total message of day, then look as the spamassassin scores
so that I can see where my avg score is?
----------------------------------

I noticed it, but I'm not a postfix kinda guy.

Are you just using spamd's logging? Or is there some special
postfix-generated logging going on here?

If it's just spamd's logs, then there's lots of analyzers at:

http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/StatsAndAnalyzers

Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin

[cpayne <cp...@magigames.net>]

Justin Mason wrote:
> cpayne writes:
>   
>> Matt Kettler wrote:
>> Thanks, guys the problem is that for SuSE 10.0 3.1.8 is the max, and the
>> last time I update a 10.0 to the lastest everything broke. And the major
>> thing for me that perl is still at 5.8.7, don't you have to be 5.8.8 or
>> higher for the lastest stuff.
>>     
>
> nope.
>
> --j.
>   
Cool I just found a source rpm and I am building 3.2.3.10 so hopefully 
this will help my issue thanks guys.

By the way, I notices no one answer the part about the script.

Payne