You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by "rejaine@bhz.jamef.com.br" <re...@bhz.jamef.com.br> on 2006/08/11 21:00:12 UTC
Too many problems whth SA:0(?/?)
Hi list,
I'm using spamassassin with qmail-rocks + qmai-scanner + clamav and I'm
having >too many< cases with messages classified with SA:0(?/?)
I read the FAQ and there I get this explanation:
>>> Why do some messages get tagged with "SA:0(?/?)" instead of
numbers?.
>>> SpamAssassins "spamd" daemon has a max e-mail size limit. If a
message
is larger than that size, it just returns with no score (as it skipped
it). As such Qmail-Scanner has no numbers to report, so it uses "?" to
show that happened. Also, if some error occurs within SpamAssassin,
Qmail-Scanner returns "?" again - showing that SA couldn't do the job on
that particular mail message. If you use softlimit to limit the max
amount of RAM SA can use - that can impact this too.
In my case, the problem aren't size limit email (spam mail are too
short, like 2-5k)
So, there is another problem with spamassassin or qmail or
configuration.
I do a google search with SA:0(?/?) and see that solution:
Start a spamd with args: m 5 --max-conn-per-child=1
but this not solved my problem...
My /var/qmail/control/qmail-smtpd-softlimit is up to 20000000
My hardware is a 2x Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (HT) -2GB RAM
Send and reciveid email are about 20.000 per day
Any ideas