You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Scott Gray <le...@gmail.com> on 2008/11/24 08:22:47 UTC
Re: Comment to : http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/General+Entity+Overview
Hi Hans
I see a proposition there, but no reasons why. What problems are you having
with the way things are currently handled and how does this change address
those problems? I'm not objecting as such, I'd just like to understand why
we need to change.
Thanks
Scott
2008/11/24 Hans Bakker <ma...@antwebsystems.com>
> I have added a proposal for change as a comment to the document at:
>
> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/General+Entity+Overview
>
> If there are no objections i will incorporate it in the text.
>
> --
> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive prices
>
>
Re: Comment to : http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/General+Entity+Overview
Posted by Vikas Mayur <vi...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
+1
On Nov 24, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> At the end +1
> Jacques
>
> From: "Scott Gray" <le...@gmail.com>
>> Ah ok, so you're talking about when the pk changes and then changes
>> again
>> but the entity name remains the same.
>> I guess the idea sounds fine to me, my only concern would be how
>> clear the
>> numbers are to people not familiar with what they mean. Also
>> entities
>> starting with numbers will end up at the top of lists in webtools
>> which
>> would be a pain, they might be better at the back so that they stay
>> near the
>> new entity.
>> Regards
>> Scott
>> 2008/11/24 Hans Bakker <ma...@antwebsystems.com>
>>> if you have more than one change on the same entity "old" will not
>>> work
>>> anymore..
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 20:22 +1300, Scott Gray wrote:
>>> > Hi Hans
>>> > I see a proposition there, but no reasons why. What problems
>>> are you
>>> having
>>> > with the way things are currently handled and how does this change
>>> address
>>> > those problems? I'm not objecting as such, I'd just like to
>>> understand
>>> why
>>> > we need to change.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Scott
>>> >
>>> > 2008/11/24 Hans Bakker <ma...@antwebsystems.com>
>>> >
>>> > > I have added a proposal for change as a comment to the
>>> document at:
>>> > >
>>> > > http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/General+Entity+Overview
>>> > >
>>> > > If there are no objections i will incorporate it in the text.
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive prices
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> --
>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive prices
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Comment to : http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/General+Entity+Overview
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
At the end +1
Jacques
From: "Scott Gray" <le...@gmail.com>
> Ah ok, so you're talking about when the pk changes and then changes again
> but the entity name remains the same.
> I guess the idea sounds fine to me, my only concern would be how clear the
> numbers are to people not familiar with what they mean. Also entities
> starting with numbers will end up at the top of lists in webtools which
> would be a pain, they might be better at the back so that they stay near the
> new entity.
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> 2008/11/24 Hans Bakker <ma...@antwebsystems.com>
>
>> if you have more than one change on the same entity "old" will not work
>> anymore..
>>
>> On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 20:22 +1300, Scott Gray wrote:
>> > Hi Hans
>> > I see a proposition there, but no reasons why. What problems are you
>> having
>> > with the way things are currently handled and how does this change
>> address
>> > those problems? I'm not objecting as such, I'd just like to understand
>> why
>> > we need to change.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Scott
>> >
>> > 2008/11/24 Hans Bakker <ma...@antwebsystems.com>
>> >
>> > > I have added a proposal for change as a comment to the document at:
>> > >
>> > > http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/General+Entity+Overview
>> > >
>> > > If there are no objections i will incorporate it in the text.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive prices
>> > >
>> > >
>> --
>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive prices
>>
>>
>
Re: Comment to : http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/General+Entity+Overview
Posted by Scott Gray <le...@gmail.com>.
Ah ok, so you're talking about when the pk changes and then changes again
but the entity name remains the same.
I guess the idea sounds fine to me, my only concern would be how clear the
numbers are to people not familiar with what they mean. Also entities
starting with numbers will end up at the top of lists in webtools which
would be a pain, they might be better at the back so that they stay near the
new entity.
Regards
Scott
2008/11/24 Hans Bakker <ma...@antwebsystems.com>
> if you have more than one change on the same entity "old" will not work
> anymore..
>
> On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 20:22 +1300, Scott Gray wrote:
> > Hi Hans
> > I see a proposition there, but no reasons why. What problems are you
> having
> > with the way things are currently handled and how does this change
> address
> > those problems? I'm not objecting as such, I'd just like to understand
> why
> > we need to change.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Scott
> >
> > 2008/11/24 Hans Bakker <ma...@antwebsystems.com>
> >
> > > I have added a proposal for change as a comment to the document at:
> > >
> > > http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/General+Entity+Overview
> > >
> > > If there are no objections i will incorporate it in the text.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive prices
> > >
> > >
> --
> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive prices
>
>
Re: Comment to :
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/General+Entity+Overview
Posted by Hans Bakker <ma...@antwebsystems.com>.
if you have more than one change on the same entity "old" will not work
anymore..
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 20:22 +1300, Scott Gray wrote:
> Hi Hans
> I see a proposition there, but no reasons why. What problems are you having
> with the way things are currently handled and how does this change address
> those problems? I'm not objecting as such, I'd just like to understand why
> we need to change.
>
> Thanks
> Scott
>
> 2008/11/24 Hans Bakker <ma...@antwebsystems.com>
>
> > I have added a proposal for change as a comment to the document at:
> >
> > http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/General+Entity+Overview
> >
> > If there are no objections i will incorporate it in the text.
> >
> > --
> > Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive prices
> >
> >
--
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive prices