You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nutch.apache.org by Arvind Srini <ar...@gmail.com> on 2011/08/22 20:29:13 UTC

Re:Rewrite protocol-httpclient

just a thought - while we are talking about package upgradation here, I see
that the current build system uses ant/ build.xml , would there be any
interest in moving towards a maven-ized build , to make upgradation / test
upgradation a bit more simpler ?

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Markus Jelsma (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>wrote:

>
>    [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13088871#comment-13088871]
>
> Markus Jelsma commented on NUTCH-1086:
> --------------------------------------
>
> Preferably the 4.1.x version. Nutch still uses the deprecated 3.x and there
> are a lot of issues to be resolved such as HTTPS support.
>

Re: Rewrite protocol-httpclient

Posted by Markus Jelsma <ma...@openindex.io>.
In branch 1.4 at first. It should be easy to port to trunk however. You're 
more than welcome to contribute.

> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Markus Jelsma
> 
> <ma...@openindex.io>wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Please see Julien's comment in this recent thread:
> > Re: Future of Nutch 2.0 [Was: Unresolved dependencies
> > org.apache.gora#gora- hbase;0.1: not found in Nutch trunk
> > 
> > To be short: no. The bulk of the work is code and manual testing, not
> > building
> > or pushing deps around :)
> 
> Agreed . Which branch would this go into, since I would like to pitch into
> the same and start contributing as well.
> 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > > just a thought - while we are talking about package upgradation here, I
> > 
> > see
> > 
> > > that the current build system uses ant/ build.xml , would there be any
> > > interest in moving towards a maven-ized build , to make upgradation /
> > 
> > test
> > 
> > > upgradation a bit more simpler ?
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Markus Jelsma (JIRA)
> > 
> > <ji...@apache.org>wrote:
> > > >    [
> > 
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira.
> > 
> > plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13088871#c
> > 
> > > > omment-13088871]
> > > > 
> > > > Markus Jelsma commented on NUTCH-1086:
> > > > --------------------------------------
> > > > 
> > > > Preferably the 4.1.x version. Nutch still uses the deprecated 3.x and
> > > > there are a lot of issues to be resolved such as HTTPS support.

Re: Rewrite protocol-httpclient

Posted by Arvind Srini <ar...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Markus Jelsma
<ma...@openindex.io>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Please see Julien's comment in this recent thread:
> Re: Future of Nutch 2.0 [Was: Unresolved dependencies org.apache.gora#gora-
> hbase;0.1: not found in Nutch trunk
>
> To be short: no. The bulk of the work is code and manual testing, not
> building
> or pushing deps around :)
>

Agreed . Which branch would this go into, since I would like to pitch into
the same and start contributing as well.





>
> Cheers,
>
> > just a thought - while we are talking about package upgradation here, I
> see
> > that the current build system uses ant/ build.xml , would there be any
> > interest in moving towards a maven-ized build , to make upgradation /
> test
> > upgradation a bit more simpler ?
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Markus Jelsma (JIRA)
> <ji...@apache.org>wrote:
> > >    [
> > >
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira.
> > >
> plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13088871#c
> > > omment-13088871]
> > >
> > > Markus Jelsma commented on NUTCH-1086:
> > > --------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Preferably the 4.1.x version. Nutch still uses the deprecated 3.x and
> > > there are a lot of issues to be resolved such as HTTPS support.
>

Re: Rewrite protocol-httpclient

Posted by Markus Jelsma <ma...@openindex.io>.
Hi,

Please see Julien's comment in this recent thread:
Re: Future of Nutch 2.0 [Was: Unresolved dependencies org.apache.gora#gora-
hbase;0.1: not found in Nutch trunk

To be short: no. The bulk of the work is code and manual testing, not building 
or pushing deps around :)

Cheers,

> just a thought - while we are talking about package upgradation here, I see
> that the current build system uses ant/ build.xml , would there be any
> interest in moving towards a maven-ized build , to make upgradation / test
> upgradation a bit more simpler ?
> 
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Markus Jelsma (JIRA) 
<ji...@apache.org>wrote:
> >    [
> > 
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira.
> > plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13088871#c
> > omment-13088871]
> > 
> > Markus Jelsma commented on NUTCH-1086:
> > --------------------------------------
> > 
> > Preferably the 4.1.x version. Nutch still uses the deprecated 3.x and
> > there are a lot of issues to be resolved such as HTTPS support.