You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Jorg Heymans <jh...@domek.be> on 2006/04/10 22:43:32 UTC
upgrade jakarta-bcel ?
Hi,
At the moment we are using jakarta-bcel-20040329.jar . Is there any
reason not to upgrade to a more recent 5.0 or 5.1 ?
If nothing else this would remove another dependency on cvs.a.o, as
that's where the snapshot release is currently hosted.
Regards,
Jorg
Re: upgrade jakarta-bcel ?
Posted by Jorg Heymans <jh...@domek.be>.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>> At the moment we are using jakarta-bcel-20040329.jar . Is there any
>> reason not to upgrade to a more recent 5.0 or 5.1 ?
>>
> Moving to 5.0 or 5.1 means downgrade.
>
Right i guess i should've checked that first.
Reading the thread, our best strategy is thus to wait for the next
release candidate and see if we can replace our current version with
this one.
Thanks for the feedback.
Jorg
Re: upgrade jakarta-bcel ?
Posted by Ben Pope <be...@gmail.com>.
On 11/04/06, Torsten Curdt <tc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Rebuilt, and it compiled ok. I also ran the webapp, and nothing
> > spurious happened, but I'm not sure where bcel is used, so I don't
> > know if that tested it or not.
>
> ...at least javaflow uses it.
> Thanks for testing!
Glad to be of service.
Ben Pope
--
I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a string...
Re: upgrade jakarta-bcel ?
Posted by Torsten Curdt <tc...@apache.org>.
> Rebuilt, and it compiled ok. I also ran the webapp, and nothing
> spurious happened, but I'm not sure where bcel is used, so I don't
> know if that tested it or not.
...at least javaflow uses it.
Thanks for testing!
cheers
--
Torsten
Re: upgrade jakarta-bcel ?
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
Ben Pope escribió:
> On 11/04/06, Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Ben.
>>
>> FYI, in xalan, bcel is used for xsltc.
>>
>
> So I guess it's used in cached pipelines, and I guess the default
> pipeline is cached, so I guess it was tested ;)
>
It depends, because the "default" xslt transformer is xalan and not
xsltc [1].
But don't worry too much testing xsltc. IMHO, the changes in the newer
bcel release allows a drop in replacement.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
[1]
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/webapp/sitemap.xmap?rev=389028&view=markup
> Ben Pope
> --
> I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a string...
>
Re: upgrade jakarta-bcel ?
Posted by Ben Pope <be...@gmail.com>.
On 11/04/06, Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net> wrote:
> Thanks Ben.
>
> FYI, in xalan, bcel is used for xsltc.
So I guess it's used in cached pipelines, and I guess the default
pipeline is cached, so I guess it was tested ;)
Ben Pope
--
I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a string...
Re: upgrade jakarta-bcel ?
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
Thanks Ben.
FYI, in xalan, bcel is used for xsltc.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
Ben Pope escribió:
> In case you or anybody else is interested, I downloaded
> bcel-5.2rc1.zip, extracted bcel-5.2rc1.jar, ran:
> mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=jakarta-bcel
> -DartifactId=jakarta-bcel -Dversion=5.2rc1 -Dpackaging=jar
> -Dfile=./bcel-5.2rc1.jar
>
> Changed: core/cocoon-core/pom.xml:
> Index: pom.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- pom.xml (revision 393100)
> +++ pom.xml (working copy)
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@
> <dependency>
> <groupId>jakarta-bcel</groupId>
> <artifactId>jakarta-bcel</artifactId>
> - <version>20040329</version>
> + <version>5.2rc1</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
>
>
> Rebuilt, and it compiled ok. I also ran the webapp, and nothing
> spurious happened, but I'm not sure where bcel is used, so I don't
> know if that tested it or not.
>
> Ben Pope
> --
> I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a string...
>
Re: upgrade jakarta-bcel ?
Posted by Ben Pope <be...@gmail.com>.
On 10/04/06, Ben Pope <be...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/04/06, Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net> wrote:
> > Ben Pope escribió:
> > >
> > > With a little digging around, 5.2RC1 has recently been released:
> > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.bcel.devel/1052
> > >
> > > And they're looking for testers, perhaps it is still time to upgrade?
> > >
> > Thanks for the link. This link points to the "Torsten site" in apache. I
> > will not consider it an official release until it shows up in the bcel
> > main site.
> >
> > I guess Jorg is trying to solve maven2 dependencies hell. Using this
> > newer release will be the same as the current one for his goal.
>
> Understood, I was pointing out that a newer release is on the horizon,
> that it might better prepare cocoon for 5.2 when it does arrive, as
> well as providing a testing ground for bcel.
In case you or anybody else is interested, I downloaded
bcel-5.2rc1.zip, extracted bcel-5.2rc1.jar, ran:
mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=jakarta-bcel
-DartifactId=jakarta-bcel -Dversion=5.2rc1 -Dpackaging=jar
-Dfile=./bcel-5.2rc1.jar
Changed: core/cocoon-core/pom.xml:
Index: pom.xml
===================================================================
--- pom.xml (revision 393100)
+++ pom.xml (working copy)
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@
<dependency>
<groupId>jakarta-bcel</groupId>
<artifactId>jakarta-bcel</artifactId>
- <version>20040329</version>
+ <version>5.2rc1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
Rebuilt, and it compiled ok. I also ran the webapp, and nothing
spurious happened, but I'm not sure where bcel is used, so I don't
know if that tested it or not.
Ben Pope
--
I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a string...
Re: upgrade jakarta-bcel ?
Posted by Torsten Curdt <tc...@apache.org>.
> > > With a little digging around, 5.2RC1 has recently been released:
> > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.bcel.devel/1052
> > >
> > > And they're looking for testers, perhaps it is still time to upgrade?
> > >
> > Thanks for the link. This link points to the "Torsten site" in apache. I
> > will not consider it an official release until it shows up in the bcel
> > main site.
> >
> > I guess Jorg is trying to solve maven2 dependencies hell. Using this
> > newer release will be the same as the current one for his goal.
>
> Understood, I was pointing out that a newer release is on the horizon,
> that it might better prepare cocoon for 5.2 when it does arrive, as
> well as providing a testing ground for bcel.
That would be actually a good idea :-)
I would like to release 5.2 ASAP
...but I still need some feedback
cheers
--
Torsten
Re: upgrade jakarta-bcel ?
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
Ben Pope escribió:
> On 10/04/06, Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net> wrote:
>
>> Ben Pope escribió:
>>
>>> With a little digging around, 5.2RC1 has recently been released:
>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.bcel.devel/1052
>>>
>>> And they're looking for testers, perhaps it is still time to upgrade?
>>>
>>>
>> Thanks for the link. This link points to the "Torsten site" in apache. I
>> will not consider it an official release until it shows up in the bcel
>> main site.
>>
>> I guess Jorg is trying to solve maven2 dependencies hell. Using this
>> newer release will be the same as the current one for his goal.
>>
>
> Understood, I was pointing out that a newer release is on the horizon,
> that it might better prepare cocoon for 5.2 when it does arrive, as
> well as providing a testing ground for bcel.
>
+1 :-)
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
Re: upgrade jakarta-bcel ?
Posted by Ben Pope <be...@gmail.com>.
On 10/04/06, Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net> wrote:
> Ben Pope escribió:
> >
> > With a little digging around, 5.2RC1 has recently been released:
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.bcel.devel/1052
> >
> > And they're looking for testers, perhaps it is still time to upgrade?
> >
> Thanks for the link. This link points to the "Torsten site" in apache. I
> will not consider it an official release until it shows up in the bcel
> main site.
>
> I guess Jorg is trying to solve maven2 dependencies hell. Using this
> newer release will be the same as the current one for his goal.
Understood, I was pointing out that a newer release is on the horizon,
that it might better prepare cocoon for 5.2 when it does arrive, as
well as providing a testing ground for bcel.
Ben Pope
--
I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a string...
Re: upgrade jakarta-bcel ?
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
Ben Pope escribió:
> On 10/04/06, Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net> wrote:
>
>> Jorg Heymans escribió:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> At the moment we are using jakarta-bcel-20040329.jar . Is there any
>>> reason not to upgrade to a more recent 5.0 or 5.1 ?
>>>
>>>
>> Moving to 5.0 or 5.1 means downgrade.
>>
>> http://jakarta.apache.org/bcel/news.html
>>
>
> With a little digging around, 5.2RC1 has recently been released:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.bcel.devel/1052
>
> And they're looking for testers, perhaps it is still time to upgrade?
>
Thanks for the link. This link points to the "Torsten site" in apache. I
will not consider it an official release until it shows up in the bcel
main site.
I guess Jorg is trying to solve maven2 dependencies hell. Using this
newer release will be the same as the current one for his goal.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
Re: upgrade jakarta-bcel ?
Posted by Ben Pope <be...@gmail.com>.
On 10/04/06, Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net> wrote:
> Jorg Heymans escribió:
> > Hi,
> >
> > At the moment we are using jakarta-bcel-20040329.jar . Is there any
> > reason not to upgrade to a more recent 5.0 or 5.1 ?
> >
> Moving to 5.0 or 5.1 means downgrade.
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/bcel/news.html
With a little digging around, 5.2RC1 has recently been released:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.bcel.devel/1052
And they're looking for testers, perhaps it is still time to upgrade?
Ben Pope
--
I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a string...
Re: upgrade jakarta-bcel ?
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
Jorg Heymans escribió:
> Hi,
>
> At the moment we are using jakarta-bcel-20040329.jar . Is there any
> reason not to upgrade to a more recent 5.0 or 5.1 ?
>
Moving to 5.0 or 5.1 means downgrade.
http://jakarta.apache.org/bcel/news.html
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
> If nothing else this would remove another dependency on cvs.a.o, as
> that's where the snapshot release is currently hosted.
>
> Regards,
> Jorg
>