You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by wsdev2012 <p....@gmail.com> on 2012/04/17 20:06:42 UTC

Soap12FaultOutInterceptor output

Hi,
could anyone please tell me if this is a but/regression or I am not doing it
properly?
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Soap12FaultOutInterceptor-output-td5645311.html

thank you.
Regards,
Paolo

--
View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Soap12FaultOutInterceptor-output-tp5647174p5647174.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Soap12FaultOutInterceptor output

Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.

On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 11:06:42 AM wsdev2012 wrote:
> Hi,
> could anyone please tell me if this is a but/regression or I am not doing
> it properly?
> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Soap12FaultOutInterceptor-output-td5645311
> .html

This could definitely be a bug, but I'd like to see a full testcase.  If you 
look in SoapFault.createFault, if the incoming fault is already a SoapFault, 
it returns it.  Thus, the subcode shouldn't be lost as there wouldn't be any 
cloning.    I'd like to see a testcase to really figure out what is 
happening.

Dan

> 
> thank you.
> Regards,
> Paolo
> 
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Soap12FaultOutInterceptor-output-tp564717
> 4p5647174.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com