You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@wicket.apache.org by "Martin Grigorov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/01/18 10:17:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (WICKET-6622) Enclosure Ajax Bug
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16746133#comment-16746133 ]
Martin Grigorov commented on WICKET-6622:
-----------------------------------------
I would recommend you to use EnclosureContainer instead of <wicket:enclosure>. It seems the latter does handle well even this very basic example :-/
> Enclosure Ajax Bug
> ------------------
>
> Key: WICKET-6622
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6622
> Project: Wicket
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: wicket
> Affects Versions: 8.2.0
> Reporter: Michael Gerhards
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: Error Message.PNG, Wicket_Enclosure_Ajax_Bug.zip
>
>
> WICKET AJAX DEBUG produces the error message
> ERROR: Cannot bind a listener for event "inputchange change" on element "text1" because the element is not in the DOM
> when component is not visible caused by enclosure:
> HTML
> <wicket:enclosure child="other">
> <input type="text" wicket:id="text"/>
> <div wicket:id="other" />
> </wicket:enclosure>
> JAVA
> other.setVisibilityAllowed(false);
>
> HTML Page source head script contains
> Wicket.Ajax.ajax(\{"u":"./?0-1.0-text","m":"POST","c":"text1","e":"inputchange change"});;
> but not text1 since it is invisible.
> See attached source project and screenshot.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)