You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Stefania (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/06/19 10:37:01 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (CASSANDRA-9448) Metrics should use up to
date nomenclature
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14593121#comment-14593121 ]
Stefania edited comment on CASSANDRA-9448 at 6/19/15 8:36 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Regarding the documentation, is [this|http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/Metrics] the only page listing all metrics?
Other than nodetool tablestats and tablehistograms are there other way to test the metrics?
was (Author: stefania):
Regarding the documentation, is [this|http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/Metrics] the only page listing all metrics?
> Metrics should use up to date nomenclature
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-9448
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9448
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Tools
> Reporter: Sam Tunnicliffe
> Assignee: Stefania
> Labels: docs-impacting
> Fix For: 3.0 beta 1
>
>
> There are a number of exposed metrics that currently are named using the old nomenclature of columnfamily and rows (meaning partitions).
> It would be good to audit all metrics and update any names to match what they actually represent; we should probably do that in a single sweep to avoid a confusing mixture of old and new terminology.
> As we'd need to do this in a major release, I've initially set the fixver for 3.0 beta1.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)