You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Stefania (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/06/19 10:37:01 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CASSANDRA-9448) Metrics should use up to date nomenclature

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14593121#comment-14593121 ] 

Stefania edited comment on CASSANDRA-9448 at 6/19/15 8:36 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

Regarding the documentation, is [this|http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/Metrics] the only page listing all metrics?

Other than nodetool tablestats and tablehistograms are there other way to test the metrics?


was (Author: stefania):
Regarding the documentation, is [this|http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/Metrics] the only page listing all metrics?

> Metrics should use up to date nomenclature
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-9448
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9448
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Tools
>            Reporter: Sam Tunnicliffe
>            Assignee: Stefania
>              Labels: docs-impacting
>             Fix For: 3.0 beta 1
>
>
> There are a number of exposed metrics that currently are named using the old nomenclature of columnfamily and rows (meaning partitions).
> It would be good to audit all metrics and update any names to match what they actually represent; we should probably do that in a single sweep to avoid a confusing mixture of old and new terminology. 
> As we'd need to do this in a major release, I've initially set the fixver for 3.0 beta1.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)