You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@isis.apache.org by "Daniel Keir Haywood (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/01/01 14:28:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (ISIS-2235) Mixins declared using @Property,
@Collection or @Action shouldn't need to indicate contribution style.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Daniel Keir Haywood updated ISIS-2235:
--------------------------------------
Summary: Mixins declared using @Property, @Collection or @Action shouldn't need to indicate contribution style. (was: Mixins declared using @Property and @Collection shouldn't need to indicate contribution style.)
> Mixins declared using @Property, @Collection or @Action shouldn't need to indicate contribution style.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISIS-2235
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-2235
> Project: Isis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Daniel Keir Haywood
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> for example, with this mixin:
> {code:java}
> @Property
> public class SimpleObject_self {
> private final SimpleObject simpleObject;
> public SimpleObject_self(SimpleObject simpleObject) {
> this.simpleObject = simpleObject;
> }
> @ActionLayout(contributed = Contributed.AS_ASSOCIATION)
> public SimpleObject prop() {
> return simpleObject;
> }
> }
> {code}
> it's necessary to specify @ActionLayout, otherwise the behaviour is contributed as both an association and an action.
> The @ActionLayout should be inferred.
> ~~~
> See the same for @Collection, also.
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)