Is Pure Master/Slave Applicable?

[Olee <ch...@gmail.com>]

Hi, I have tried this, before start activemq, I clean up all the data on both
slave and master, the slave can attached to the master successfully, but
when I run some client program, the async problem often occurs.

Have you ever use  Pure Master/Slave mode? Is it works? If so, can you tell
me how to configure the master and slave to aviod async problem?. 
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-Pure-Master-Slave-Applicable--tp19870907p19870907.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Is Pure Master/Slave Applicable?

[Hans Bausewein <ha...@comerwell.xs4all.nl>]

Olee wrote:
> 
> Hi, I have tried this, before start activemq, I clean up all the data on
> both slave and master, the slave can attached to the master successfully,
> but when I run some client program, the async problem often occurs.
> 
> Have you ever use  Pure Master/Slave mode? Is it works? If so, can you
> tell me how to configure the master and slave to aviod async problem?. 
> 

Well, I've seen a lot of progress. I just started testing RC2
  http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--ActiveMQ-5.2.0---RC2-td19874910.html

which seems a big improvement over RC1 or 5.1.0

AMQ-1849 and AMQ-1950 have been fixed.

They broke the tests very quickly, so I could not test much at all.

Hans
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-Pure-Master-Slave-Applicable--tp19870907p19887886.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.