You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de> on 2012/01/27 22:19:26 UTC
[VOTE] Release Configuration 1.8 based on RC1
Hi all,
this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the
first release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new
language features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK
version). This could be achieved in a binary compatible way.
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1
Binaries:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/
Maven artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/maven/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/site/
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Vote will remain open for 72 hours.
Thanks!
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
[RESULT] Release Configuration 1.8 based on RC1
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
The vote to release Commons Configuration based on RC1 has passed. The
following votes (all binding) were cast:
Gary Gregory +1
Simone Tripodi +1
Luc Maisonobe +1
Jörg Schaible +1
Oliver Heger +1
Thanks for all the votes and feedback. I will probably start the release
procedure on the coming weekend.
Oliver
Am 27.01.2012 22:19, schrieb Oliver Heger:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the
> first release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new
> language features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK
> version). This could be achieved in a binary compatible way.
>
> Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1
>
>
> Binaries:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/
>
> Maven artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/maven/
>
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/site/
>
> Release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> Vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks!
> Oliver
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.8 based on RC1
Posted by Luc Maisonobe <Lu...@free.fr>.
+1
thanks,
Luc
Le 01/02/2012 07:05, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
> +1 too Oliver, great work!
>
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Oliver Heger
>> <ol...@oliver-heger.de>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gary,
>>>
>>> Am 30.01.2012 22:37, schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>>
>>> Hi Oliver:
>>>>
>>>> These header issues are not real blockers (hence my -0). I was hoping to
>>>> nudge you into fixing these but I also know that cutting another RC can be
>>>> a pain.
>>>>
>>>> My POV is that consistency is important. Why make people spend time
>>>> figuring out if RAT warnings are valid or not, especially when the fix is
>>>> trivial? With 0 RAT warnings, I can move on to the next item down the
>>>> check
>>>> list.
>>>>
>>>> I would be happy if these header issues were all fixed in trunk such that
>>>> the next release would pick them up. I do not think that "it was already
>>>> broken" is a good reason to skip a task ;)
>>>>
>>>> Then I could +1 this release with the comfort that the next release would
>>>> have the 'fixes'.
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>
>>> point taken, and it turned out that it was really good to look at these
>>> issues:
>>> - The css file was obviously not needed, maybe it was a relict from the
>>> maven 1 build. I removed it.
>>> - A license header was added to PROPOSAL.html.
>>> - I am afraid, I currently cannot solve the issue with the plist file. The
>>> parser for plist files in [configuration] cannot deal with comments. I
>>> created [CONFIGURATION-477] for this purpose (to be fixed in a later
>>> release). So this is the only file the RAT report complains about.
>>>
>>
>> Very nice! Thank you. Voila: +1.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>>> Oliver
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Oliver Heger
>>>> <ol...@oliver-heger.de>**wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Simone and Gary,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for reviewing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regarding the missing license headers:
>>>>> - project.css is a trivial one-liner, AIUI it is not required to have a
>>>>> header in such cases.
>>>>> - test.plist is a test configuration file used by some unit tests. I
>>>>> would
>>>>> add a header, but I don't know what would be the correct format for plist
>>>>> files. OTOH, I assume that simple test files can also go without headers
>>>>> as
>>>>> they really do not contain any intellectual properties.
>>>>> - PROPOSAL.html is around since the very beginning and never had a
>>>>> header.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please take into account that the affected files have not been changed
>>>>> since the last release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regarding dependencies to other commons components:
>>>>> I think we updated all dependencies possible without breaking binary
>>>>> compatibility (for instance, the public API exposes some classes of
>>>>> Commons
>>>>> Lang, therefore we could not update to Lang 3.0). An exception is the
>>>>> dependency to Digester, but this is used by a single class only which is
>>>>> deprecated. So there is no big motivation to change something in this
>>>>> area.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could I convince you to a +1 vote ;-)
>>>>> Oliver
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 30.01.2012 19:03, schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>>>>
>>>>> -0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like a couple of missing headers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For me, I see:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unapproved licenses:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> src/site/xdoc/style/project.****css
>>>>>>
>>>>>> src/test/resources/test.plist
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see no complaint about PROPOSAL.html which IS missing a header.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now that the component requires Java 5, it seems like a good time to
>>>>>> update
>>>>>> the deps too, not critical for 1.8, but should be considered if another
>>>>>> RC
>>>>>> is made.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tested with:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apache Maven 3.0.4 (r1232337; 2012-01-17 03:44:56-0500)
>>>>>> Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.4\****bin\..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Java version: 1.6.0_29, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
>>>>>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_29\jre
>>>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>>>>>> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Simone Tripodi
>>>>>> <si...@apache.org>****wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Oliver,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am for getting [configuration] released
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * binaries checksums+gpg are OK
>>>>>>> * clirr report is OK
>>>>>>> * checkstyle is OK
>>>>>>> * findbugs is OK
>>>>>>> * project build OK
>>>>>>> * mvn artifacts look having right metadata (Implementation-Build)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> there is the RAT report that shows that there are 3 Unknown Licenses -
>>>>>>> not sure this is blocking
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unapproved licenses:
>>>>>>> PROPOSAL.html
>>>>>>> src/site/xdoc/style/project.****css
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> src/test/resources/test.plist
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you provide a feedback please? Many thanks in advance, all the
>>>>>>> best!
>>>>>>> -Simo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****simonetripodi/<http://people.apache.org/%7E**simonetripodi/>
>>>>>>> <http://people.**apache.org/%7Esimonetripodi/<http://people.apache.org/%7Esimonetripodi/>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://simonetripodi.**livejou**rnal.com/ <http://livejournal.com/><
>>>>>>> http://**simonetripodi.livejournal.com/<http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/>
>>>>>>> **>
>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/****simonetripodi<http://twitter.com/**simonetripodi>
>>>>>>> <http://twitter.**com/simonetripodi <http://twitter.com/simonetripodi>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Oliver Heger
>>>>>>> <ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the
>>>>>>>> first
>>>>>>>> release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new
>>>>>>>> language
>>>>>>>> features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK version).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> could be achieved in a binary compatible way.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tag:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/****asf/commons/proper/**<https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/commons/proper/**>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> configuration/tags/****CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1<https://**
>>>>>>> svn.apache.org/repos/asf/**commons/proper/configuration/**
>>>>>>> tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Binaries:
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7E**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/>
>>>>>>>> <h**ttp://people.apache.org/%**7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/>
>>>>>>>> **>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/****maven/<http://people.apache.org/%7E**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**maven/>
>>>>>>>> <http://people.apache.**org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.**8rc1/maven/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/maven/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Site:
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/****site/<http://people.apache.org/%7E**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**site/>
>>>>>>>> <http://people.apache.**org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.**8rc1/site/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/site/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Release notes:
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**<http://people.apache.org/%7E**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**>
>>>>>>>> RELEASE-NOTES.txt<http://**people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/**
>>>>>>>> configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-**NOTES.txt<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>>>>>>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>> Oliver
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------**--**
>>>>>>>> ---------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apac**he.org<http://apache.org>
>>>>>>>> <de...@commons.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------**--**
>>>>>>> ---------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apac**he.org<http://apache.org>
>>>>>>> <de...@commons.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------**
>>>>> --**---------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apac**he.org<http://apache.org>
>>>>> <de...@commons.apache.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<de...@commons.apache.org>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
>> JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
>> Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.8 based on RC1
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
+1 too Oliver, great work!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Oliver Heger
> <ol...@oliver-heger.de>wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary,
>>
>> Am 30.01.2012 22:37, schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>
>> Hi Oliver:
>>>
>>> These header issues are not real blockers (hence my -0). I was hoping to
>>> nudge you into fixing these but I also know that cutting another RC can be
>>> a pain.
>>>
>>> My POV is that consistency is important. Why make people spend time
>>> figuring out if RAT warnings are valid or not, especially when the fix is
>>> trivial? With 0 RAT warnings, I can move on to the next item down the
>>> check
>>> list.
>>>
>>> I would be happy if these header issues were all fixed in trunk such that
>>> the next release would pick them up. I do not think that "it was already
>>> broken" is a good reason to skip a task ;)
>>>
>>> Then I could +1 this release with the comfort that the next release would
>>> have the 'fixes'.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>
>> point taken, and it turned out that it was really good to look at these
>> issues:
>> - The css file was obviously not needed, maybe it was a relict from the
>> maven 1 build. I removed it.
>> - A license header was added to PROPOSAL.html.
>> - I am afraid, I currently cannot solve the issue with the plist file. The
>> parser for plist files in [configuration] cannot deal with comments. I
>> created [CONFIGURATION-477] for this purpose (to be fixed in a later
>> release). So this is the only file the RAT report complains about.
>>
>
> Very nice! Thank you. Voila: +1.
>
> Gary
>
>
>> Oliver
>>
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Oliver Heger
>>> <ol...@oliver-heger.de>**wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Simone and Gary,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for reviewing.
>>>>
>>>> Regarding the missing license headers:
>>>> - project.css is a trivial one-liner, AIUI it is not required to have a
>>>> header in such cases.
>>>> - test.plist is a test configuration file used by some unit tests. I
>>>> would
>>>> add a header, but I don't know what would be the correct format for plist
>>>> files. OTOH, I assume that simple test files can also go without headers
>>>> as
>>>> they really do not contain any intellectual properties.
>>>> - PROPOSAL.html is around since the very beginning and never had a
>>>> header.
>>>>
>>>> Please take into account that the affected files have not been changed
>>>> since the last release.
>>>>
>>>> Regarding dependencies to other commons components:
>>>> I think we updated all dependencies possible without breaking binary
>>>> compatibility (for instance, the public API exposes some classes of
>>>> Commons
>>>> Lang, therefore we could not update to Lang 3.0). An exception is the
>>>> dependency to Digester, but this is used by a single class only which is
>>>> deprecated. So there is no big motivation to change something in this
>>>> area.
>>>>
>>>> Could I convince you to a +1 vote ;-)
>>>> Oliver
>>>>
>>>> Am 30.01.2012 19:03, schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>>>
>>>> -0
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like a couple of missing headers.
>>>>>
>>>>> For me, I see:
>>>>>
>>>>> Unapproved licenses:
>>>>>
>>>>> src/site/xdoc/style/project.****css
>>>>>
>>>>> src/test/resources/test.plist
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I see no complaint about PROPOSAL.html which IS missing a header.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that the component requires Java 5, it seems like a good time to
>>>>> update
>>>>> the deps too, not critical for 1.8, but should be considered if another
>>>>> RC
>>>>> is made.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested with:
>>>>>
>>>>> Apache Maven 3.0.4 (r1232337; 2012-01-17 03:44:56-0500)
>>>>> Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.4\****bin\..
>>>>>
>>>>> Java version: 1.6.0_29, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
>>>>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_29\jre
>>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>>>>> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>>>>
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Simone Tripodi
>>>>> <si...@apache.org>****wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello Oliver,
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am for getting [configuration] released
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * binaries checksums+gpg are OK
>>>>>> * clirr report is OK
>>>>>> * checkstyle is OK
>>>>>> * findbugs is OK
>>>>>> * project build OK
>>>>>> * mvn artifacts look having right metadata (Implementation-Build)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> there is the RAT report that shows that there are 3 Unknown Licenses -
>>>>>> not sure this is blocking
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unapproved licenses:
>>>>>> PROPOSAL.html
>>>>>> src/site/xdoc/style/project.****css
>>>>>>
>>>>>> src/test/resources/test.plist
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you provide a feedback please? Many thanks in advance, all the
>>>>>> best!
>>>>>> -Simo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****simonetripodi/<http://people.apache.org/%7E**simonetripodi/>
>>>>>> <http://people.**apache.org/%7Esimonetripodi/<http://people.apache.org/%7Esimonetripodi/>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> http://simonetripodi.**livejou**rnal.com/ <http://livejournal.com/><
>>>>>> http://**simonetripodi.livejournal.com/<http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/>
>>>>>> **>
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/****simonetripodi<http://twitter.com/**simonetripodi>
>>>>>> <http://twitter.**com/simonetripodi <http://twitter.com/simonetripodi>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Oliver Heger
>>>>>> <ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the
>>>>>>> first
>>>>>>> release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new
>>>>>>> language
>>>>>>> features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK version).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>
>>>>>> could be achieved in a binary compatible way.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tag:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/****asf/commons/proper/**<https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/commons/proper/**>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> configuration/tags/****CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1<https://**
>>>>>> svn.apache.org/repos/asf/**commons/proper/configuration/**
>>>>>> tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Binaries:
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7E**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/>
>>>>>>> <h**ttp://people.apache.org/%**7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/>
>>>>>>> **>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/****maven/<http://people.apache.org/%7E**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**maven/>
>>>>>>> <http://people.apache.**org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.**8rc1/maven/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/maven/>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Site:
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/****site/<http://people.apache.org/%7E**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**site/>
>>>>>>> <http://people.apache.**org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.**8rc1/site/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/site/>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Release notes:
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**<http://people.apache.org/%7E**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**>
>>>>>>> RELEASE-NOTES.txt<http://**people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/**
>>>>>>> configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-**NOTES.txt<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>>>>>> [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>>>>>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>> Oliver
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------**--**
>>>>>>> ---------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apac**he.org<http://apache.org>
>>>>>>> <de...@commons.apache.org>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------**--**
>>>>>> ---------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apac**he.org<http://apache.org>
>>>>>> <de...@commons.apache.org>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------**
>>>> --**---------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apac**he.org<http://apache.org>
>>>> <de...@commons.apache.org>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<de...@commons.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
> Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.8 based on RC1
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Oliver Heger
<ol...@oliver-heger.de>wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Am 30.01.2012 22:37, schrieb Gary Gregory:
>
> Hi Oliver:
>>
>> These header issues are not real blockers (hence my -0). I was hoping to
>> nudge you into fixing these but I also know that cutting another RC can be
>> a pain.
>>
>> My POV is that consistency is important. Why make people spend time
>> figuring out if RAT warnings are valid or not, especially when the fix is
>> trivial? With 0 RAT warnings, I can move on to the next item down the
>> check
>> list.
>>
>> I would be happy if these header issues were all fixed in trunk such that
>> the next release would pick them up. I do not think that "it was already
>> broken" is a good reason to skip a task ;)
>>
>> Then I could +1 this release with the comfort that the next release would
>> have the 'fixes'.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>
> point taken, and it turned out that it was really good to look at these
> issues:
> - The css file was obviously not needed, maybe it was a relict from the
> maven 1 build. I removed it.
> - A license header was added to PROPOSAL.html.
> - I am afraid, I currently cannot solve the issue with the plist file. The
> parser for plist files in [configuration] cannot deal with comments. I
> created [CONFIGURATION-477] for this purpose (to be fixed in a later
> release). So this is the only file the RAT report complains about.
>
Very nice! Thank you. Voila: +1.
Gary
> Oliver
>
>
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Oliver Heger
>> <ol...@oliver-heger.de>**wrote:
>>
>> Hi Simone and Gary,
>>>
>>> thanks for reviewing.
>>>
>>> Regarding the missing license headers:
>>> - project.css is a trivial one-liner, AIUI it is not required to have a
>>> header in such cases.
>>> - test.plist is a test configuration file used by some unit tests. I
>>> would
>>> add a header, but I don't know what would be the correct format for plist
>>> files. OTOH, I assume that simple test files can also go without headers
>>> as
>>> they really do not contain any intellectual properties.
>>> - PROPOSAL.html is around since the very beginning and never had a
>>> header.
>>>
>>> Please take into account that the affected files have not been changed
>>> since the last release.
>>>
>>> Regarding dependencies to other commons components:
>>> I think we updated all dependencies possible without breaking binary
>>> compatibility (for instance, the public API exposes some classes of
>>> Commons
>>> Lang, therefore we could not update to Lang 3.0). An exception is the
>>> dependency to Digester, but this is used by a single class only which is
>>> deprecated. So there is no big motivation to change something in this
>>> area.
>>>
>>> Could I convince you to a +1 vote ;-)
>>> Oliver
>>>
>>> Am 30.01.2012 19:03, schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>>
>>> -0
>>>>
>>>> Looks like a couple of missing headers.
>>>>
>>>> For me, I see:
>>>>
>>>> Unapproved licenses:
>>>>
>>>> src/site/xdoc/style/project.****css
>>>>
>>>> src/test/resources/test.plist
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I see no complaint about PROPOSAL.html which IS missing a header.
>>>>
>>>> Now that the component requires Java 5, it seems like a good time to
>>>> update
>>>> the deps too, not critical for 1.8, but should be considered if another
>>>> RC
>>>> is made.
>>>>
>>>> Tested with:
>>>>
>>>> Apache Maven 3.0.4 (r1232337; 2012-01-17 03:44:56-0500)
>>>> Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.4\****bin\..
>>>>
>>>> Java version: 1.6.0_29, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
>>>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_29\jre
>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>>>> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Simone Tripodi
>>>> <si...@apache.org>****wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Oliver,
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am for getting [configuration] released
>>>>>
>>>>> * binaries checksums+gpg are OK
>>>>> * clirr report is OK
>>>>> * checkstyle is OK
>>>>> * findbugs is OK
>>>>> * project build OK
>>>>> * mvn artifacts look having right metadata (Implementation-Build)
>>>>>
>>>>> there is the RAT report that shows that there are 3 Unknown Licenses -
>>>>> not sure this is blocking
>>>>>
>>>>> Unapproved licenses:
>>>>> PROPOSAL.html
>>>>> src/site/xdoc/style/project.****css
>>>>>
>>>>> src/test/resources/test.plist
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you provide a feedback please? Many thanks in advance, all the
>>>>> best!
>>>>> -Simo
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****simonetripodi/<http://people.apache.org/%7E**simonetripodi/>
>>>>> <http://people.**apache.org/%7Esimonetripodi/<http://people.apache.org/%7Esimonetripodi/>
>>>>> >
>>>>> http://simonetripodi.**livejou**rnal.com/ <http://livejournal.com/><
>>>>> http://**simonetripodi.livejournal.com/<http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/>
>>>>> **>
>>>>> http://twitter.com/****simonetripodi<http://twitter.com/**simonetripodi>
>>>>> <http://twitter.**com/simonetripodi <http://twitter.com/simonetripodi>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Oliver Heger
>>>>> <ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the
>>>>>> first
>>>>>> release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new
>>>>>> language
>>>>>> features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK version).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This
>>>>>
>>>>> could be achieved in a binary compatible way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tag:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/****asf/commons/proper/**<https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/commons/proper/**>
>>>>>>
>>>>> configuration/tags/****CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1<https://**
>>>>> svn.apache.org/repos/asf/**commons/proper/configuration/**
>>>>> tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Binaries:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7E**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/>
>>>>>> <h**ttp://people.apache.org/%**7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/>
>>>>>> **>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/****maven/<http://people.apache.org/%7E**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**maven/>
>>>>>> <http://people.apache.**org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.**8rc1/maven/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/maven/>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Site:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/****site/<http://people.apache.org/%7E**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**site/>
>>>>>> <http://people.apache.**org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.**8rc1/site/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/site/>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Release notes:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**<http://people.apache.org/%7E**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**>
>>>>>> RELEASE-NOTES.txt<http://**people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/**
>>>>>> configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-**NOTES.txt<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>>>>> [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>>>>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>>>>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> Oliver
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------**--**
>>>>>> ---------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apac**he.org<http://apache.org>
>>>>>> <de...@commons.apache.org>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------**--**
>>>>> ---------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apac**he.org<http://apache.org>
>>>>> <de...@commons.apache.org>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------**
>>> --**---------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apac**he.org<http://apache.org>
>>> <de...@commons.apache.org>
>>> >
>>>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<de...@commons.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.8 based on RC1
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
Hi Gary,
Am 30.01.2012 22:37, schrieb Gary Gregory:
> Hi Oliver:
>
> These header issues are not real blockers (hence my -0). I was hoping to
> nudge you into fixing these but I also know that cutting another RC can be
> a pain.
>
> My POV is that consistency is important. Why make people spend time
> figuring out if RAT warnings are valid or not, especially when the fix is
> trivial? With 0 RAT warnings, I can move on to the next item down the check
> list.
>
> I would be happy if these header issues were all fixed in trunk such that
> the next release would pick them up. I do not think that "it was already
> broken" is a good reason to skip a task ;)
>
> Then I could +1 this release with the comfort that the next release would
> have the 'fixes'.
>
> Gary
point taken, and it turned out that it was really good to look at these
issues:
- The css file was obviously not needed, maybe it was a relict from the
maven 1 build. I removed it.
- A license header was added to PROPOSAL.html.
- I am afraid, I currently cannot solve the issue with the plist file.
The parser for plist files in [configuration] cannot deal with comments.
I created [CONFIGURATION-477] for this purpose (to be fixed in a later
release). So this is the only file the RAT report complains about.
Oliver
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Oliver Heger
> <ol...@oliver-heger.de>wrote:
>
>> Hi Simone and Gary,
>>
>> thanks for reviewing.
>>
>> Regarding the missing license headers:
>> - project.css is a trivial one-liner, AIUI it is not required to have a
>> header in such cases.
>> - test.plist is a test configuration file used by some unit tests. I would
>> add a header, but I don't know what would be the correct format for plist
>> files. OTOH, I assume that simple test files can also go without headers as
>> they really do not contain any intellectual properties.
>> - PROPOSAL.html is around since the very beginning and never had a header.
>>
>> Please take into account that the affected files have not been changed
>> since the last release.
>>
>> Regarding dependencies to other commons components:
>> I think we updated all dependencies possible without breaking binary
>> compatibility (for instance, the public API exposes some classes of Commons
>> Lang, therefore we could not update to Lang 3.0). An exception is the
>> dependency to Digester, but this is used by a single class only which is
>> deprecated. So there is no big motivation to change something in this area.
>>
>> Could I convince you to a +1 vote ;-)
>> Oliver
>>
>> Am 30.01.2012 19:03, schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>
>>> -0
>>>
>>> Looks like a couple of missing headers.
>>>
>>> For me, I see:
>>>
>>> Unapproved licenses:
>>>
>>> src/site/xdoc/style/project.**css
>>> src/test/resources/test.plist
>>>
>>>
>>> I see no complaint about PROPOSAL.html which IS missing a header.
>>>
>>> Now that the component requires Java 5, it seems like a good time to
>>> update
>>> the deps too, not critical for 1.8, but should be considered if another RC
>>> is made.
>>>
>>> Tested with:
>>>
>>> Apache Maven 3.0.4 (r1232337; 2012-01-17 03:44:56-0500)
>>> Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.4\**bin\..
>>> Java version: 1.6.0_29, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
>>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_29\jre
>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>>> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Simone Tripodi
>>> <si...@apache.org>**wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Oliver,
>>>>
>>>> I am for getting [configuration] released
>>>>
>>>> * binaries checksums+gpg are OK
>>>> * clirr report is OK
>>>> * checkstyle is OK
>>>> * findbugs is OK
>>>> * project build OK
>>>> * mvn artifacts look having right metadata (Implementation-Build)
>>>>
>>>> there is the RAT report that shows that there are 3 Unknown Licenses -
>>>> not sure this is blocking
>>>>
>>>> Unapproved licenses:
>>>> PROPOSAL.html
>>>> src/site/xdoc/style/project.**css
>>>> src/test/resources/test.plist
>>>>
>>>> Can you provide a feedback please? Many thanks in advance, all the best!
>>>> -Simo
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**simonetripodi/<http://people.apache.org/%7Esimonetripodi/>
>>>> http://simonetripodi.**livejournal.com/<http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/>
>>>> http://twitter.com/**simonetripodi<http://twitter.com/simonetripodi>
>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Oliver Heger
>>>> <ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the
>>>>> first
>>>>> release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new
>>>>> language
>>>>> features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK version).
>>>>>
>>>> This
>>>>
>>>>> could be achieved in a binary compatible way.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tag:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/commons/proper/**
>>>> configuration/tags/**CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Binaries:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/>
>>>>>
>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**maven/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/maven/>
>>>>>
>>>>> Site:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**site/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/site/>
>>>>>
>>>>> Release notes:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**
>>>>> RELEASE-NOTES.txt<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt>
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>>>> [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>>>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>>>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>>>>
>>>>> Vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> Oliver
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>>>> ---------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<de...@commons.apache.org>
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>>> ---------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<de...@commons.apache.org>
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<de...@commons.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.8 based on RC1
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
Hi Oliver:
These header issues are not real blockers (hence my -0). I was hoping to
nudge you into fixing these but I also know that cutting another RC can be
a pain.
My POV is that consistency is important. Why make people spend time
figuring out if RAT warnings are valid or not, especially when the fix is
trivial? With 0 RAT warnings, I can move on to the next item down the check
list.
I would be happy if these header issues were all fixed in trunk such that
the next release would pick them up. I do not think that "it was already
broken" is a good reason to skip a task ;)
Then I could +1 this release with the comfort that the next release would
have the 'fixes'.
Gary
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Oliver Heger
<ol...@oliver-heger.de>wrote:
> Hi Simone and Gary,
>
> thanks for reviewing.
>
> Regarding the missing license headers:
> - project.css is a trivial one-liner, AIUI it is not required to have a
> header in such cases.
> - test.plist is a test configuration file used by some unit tests. I would
> add a header, but I don't know what would be the correct format for plist
> files. OTOH, I assume that simple test files can also go without headers as
> they really do not contain any intellectual properties.
> - PROPOSAL.html is around since the very beginning and never had a header.
>
> Please take into account that the affected files have not been changed
> since the last release.
>
> Regarding dependencies to other commons components:
> I think we updated all dependencies possible without breaking binary
> compatibility (for instance, the public API exposes some classes of Commons
> Lang, therefore we could not update to Lang 3.0). An exception is the
> dependency to Digester, but this is used by a single class only which is
> deprecated. So there is no big motivation to change something in this area.
>
> Could I convince you to a +1 vote ;-)
> Oliver
>
> Am 30.01.2012 19:03, schrieb Gary Gregory:
>
>> -0
>>
>> Looks like a couple of missing headers.
>>
>> For me, I see:
>>
>> Unapproved licenses:
>>
>> src/site/xdoc/style/project.**css
>> src/test/resources/test.plist
>>
>>
>> I see no complaint about PROPOSAL.html which IS missing a header.
>>
>> Now that the component requires Java 5, it seems like a good time to
>> update
>> the deps too, not critical for 1.8, but should be considered if another RC
>> is made.
>>
>> Tested with:
>>
>> Apache Maven 3.0.4 (r1232337; 2012-01-17 03:44:56-0500)
>> Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.4\**bin\..
>> Java version: 1.6.0_29, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_29\jre
>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Simone Tripodi
>> <si...@apache.org>**wrote:
>>
>> Hello Oliver,
>>>
>>> I am for getting [configuration] released
>>>
>>> * binaries checksums+gpg are OK
>>> * clirr report is OK
>>> * checkstyle is OK
>>> * findbugs is OK
>>> * project build OK
>>> * mvn artifacts look having right metadata (Implementation-Build)
>>>
>>> there is the RAT report that shows that there are 3 Unknown Licenses -
>>> not sure this is blocking
>>>
>>> Unapproved licenses:
>>> PROPOSAL.html
>>> src/site/xdoc/style/project.**css
>>> src/test/resources/test.plist
>>>
>>> Can you provide a feedback please? Many thanks in advance, all the best!
>>> -Simo
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~**simonetripodi/<http://people.apache.org/%7Esimonetripodi/>
>>> http://simonetripodi.**livejournal.com/<http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/>
>>> http://twitter.com/**simonetripodi <http://twitter.com/simonetripodi>
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Oliver Heger
>>> <ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the
>>>> first
>>>> release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new
>>>> language
>>>> features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK version).
>>>>
>>> This
>>>
>>>> could be achieved in a binary compatible way.
>>>>
>>>> Tag:
>>>>
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/commons/proper/**
>>> configuration/tags/**CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Binaries:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/>
>>>>
>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**maven/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/maven/>
>>>>
>>>> Site:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**site/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/site/>
>>>>
>>>> Release notes:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**
>>>> RELEASE-NOTES.txt<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt>
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>>> [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>>>
>>>> Vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Oliver
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>>> ---------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<de...@commons.apache.org>
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>> ---------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<de...@commons.apache.org>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<de...@commons.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.8 based on RC1
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
Hi Simone and Gary,
thanks for reviewing.
Regarding the missing license headers:
- project.css is a trivial one-liner, AIUI it is not required to have a
header in such cases.
- test.plist is a test configuration file used by some unit tests. I
would add a header, but I don't know what would be the correct format
for plist files. OTOH, I assume that simple test files can also go
without headers as they really do not contain any intellectual properties.
- PROPOSAL.html is around since the very beginning and never had a header.
Please take into account that the affected files have not been changed
since the last release.
Regarding dependencies to other commons components:
I think we updated all dependencies possible without breaking binary
compatibility (for instance, the public API exposes some classes of
Commons Lang, therefore we could not update to Lang 3.0). An exception
is the dependency to Digester, but this is used by a single class only
which is deprecated. So there is no big motivation to change something
in this area.
Could I convince you to a +1 vote ;-)
Oliver
Am 30.01.2012 19:03, schrieb Gary Gregory:
> -0
>
> Looks like a couple of missing headers.
>
> For me, I see:
>
> Unapproved licenses:
>
> src/site/xdoc/style/project.css
> src/test/resources/test.plist
>
>
> I see no complaint about PROPOSAL.html which IS missing a header.
>
> Now that the component requires Java 5, it seems like a good time to update
> the deps too, not critical for 1.8, but should be considered if another RC
> is made.
>
> Tested with:
>
> Apache Maven 3.0.4 (r1232337; 2012-01-17 03:44:56-0500)
> Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.4\bin\..
> Java version: 1.6.0_29, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_29\jre
> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Simone Tripodi
> <si...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Hello Oliver,
>>
>> I am for getting [configuration] released
>>
>> * binaries checksums+gpg are OK
>> * clirr report is OK
>> * checkstyle is OK
>> * findbugs is OK
>> * project build OK
>> * mvn artifacts look having right metadata (Implementation-Build)
>>
>> there is the RAT report that shows that there are 3 Unknown Licenses -
>> not sure this is blocking
>>
>> Unapproved licenses:
>> PROPOSAL.html
>> src/site/xdoc/style/project.css
>> src/test/resources/test.plist
>>
>> Can you provide a feedback please? Many thanks in advance, all the best!
>> -Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Oliver Heger
>> <ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the first
>>> release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new language
>>> features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK version).
>> This
>>> could be achieved in a binary compatible way.
>>>
>>> Tag:
>>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1
>>>
>>> Binaries:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/
>>>
>>> Maven artifacts:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/maven/
>>>
>>> Site:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/site/
>>>
>>> Release notes:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>> [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>>
>>> Vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Oliver
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.8 based on RC1
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
-0
Looks like a couple of missing headers.
For me, I see:
Unapproved licenses:
src/site/xdoc/style/project.css
src/test/resources/test.plist
I see no complaint about PROPOSAL.html which IS missing a header.
Now that the component requires Java 5, it seems like a good time to update
the deps too, not critical for 1.8, but should be considered if another RC
is made.
Tested with:
Apache Maven 3.0.4 (r1232337; 2012-01-17 03:44:56-0500)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.4\bin\..
Java version: 1.6.0_29, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_29\jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
Gary
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Simone Tripodi
<si...@apache.org>wrote:
> Hello Oliver,
>
> I am for getting [configuration] released
>
> * binaries checksums+gpg are OK
> * clirr report is OK
> * checkstyle is OK
> * findbugs is OK
> * project build OK
> * mvn artifacts look having right metadata (Implementation-Build)
>
> there is the RAT report that shows that there are 3 Unknown Licenses -
> not sure this is blocking
>
> Unapproved licenses:
> PROPOSAL.html
> src/site/xdoc/style/project.css
> src/test/resources/test.plist
>
> Can you provide a feedback please? Many thanks in advance, all the best!
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Oliver Heger
> <ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the first
> > release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new language
> > features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK version).
> This
> > could be achieved in a binary compatible way.
> >
> > Tag:
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1
> >
> > Binaries:
> > http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/
> >
> > Maven artifacts:
> > http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/maven/
> >
> > Site:
> > http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/site/
> >
> > Release notes:
> > http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> > [ ] +0 OK, but...
> > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> >
> > Vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Oliver
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.8 based on RC1
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
Hello Oliver,
I am for getting [configuration] released
* binaries checksums+gpg are OK
* clirr report is OK
* checkstyle is OK
* findbugs is OK
* project build OK
* mvn artifacts look having right metadata (Implementation-Build)
there is the RAT report that shows that there are 3 Unknown Licenses -
not sure this is blocking
Unapproved licenses:
PROPOSAL.html
src/site/xdoc/style/project.css
src/test/resources/test.plist
Can you provide a feedback please? Many thanks in advance, all the best!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Oliver Heger
<ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the first
> release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new language
> features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK version). This
> could be achieved in a binary compatible way.
>
> Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1
>
> Binaries:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/
>
> Maven artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/maven/
>
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/site/
>
> Release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> Vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks!
> Oliver
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.8 based on RC1
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
Here is my +1
Oliver
Am 27.01.2012 22:19, schrieb Oliver Heger:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the
> first release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new
> language features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK
> version). This could be achieved in a binary compatible way.
>
> Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1
>
>
> Binaries:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/
>
> Maven artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/maven/
>
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/site/
>
> Release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> Vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks!
> Oliver
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.8 based on RC1
Posted by Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de>.
Oliver Heger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the
> first release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new
> language features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK
> version). This could be achieved in a binary compatible way.
>
> Tag:
>
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1
>
> Binaries:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/
>
> Maven artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/maven/
>
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/site/
>
> Release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> Vote will remain open for 72 hours.
+1, looks good, could build from source with my compiler zoo.
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org