You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> on 2009/10/07 22:53:36 UTC

Re: Using Jackson for JSON-RPC, was Re: [2.x] JSON-RPC Binding Availability

The JAXB feature seems to be in a separate jar: 
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/jackson/jackson-xc/1.2.1/

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Luciano Resende" <lu...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 11:44 AM
To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>; <an...@apache.org>
Subject: Using Jackson for JSON-RPC, was Re: [2.x] JSON-RPC Binding 
Availability

> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:50 PM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:05 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Next,
>>>>> I'll look into upgrading to the latest JSON-RPC Jabsorb framework.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How about updating to Jackson instead of Jabsorb? We already use
>>>> Jackson in the JSONP binding in 2.x, it seems much more up to date and
>>>> designed for what we need in Tuscany.
>>>>
>>>>   ...ant
>>>>
>>>
>>> I had a quick look at jackson, does that have support for JSON-RPC or
>>> just JSON ?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Right, it handles just the JSON part, we'd have to layer the rest of
>> the protocol on top of that. Not such a big deal though and a similar
>> thing as we already do in the binding for the SMD support.
>>
>>   ...ant
>>
>
> Reading a thread in jackson-user [1] it seems that it has JAXB
> dependencies ... do you know if that is true ? If so, I'd like to
> avoid it as it would prevent the extensions to run on AppEngine.
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/lg3t6z3frw4ijl32
>
> -- 
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/