You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@forrest.apache.org by "Ross Gardler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/06/11 13:01:25 UTC
[jira] Created: (FOR-1006) Multiple definitions in glossary
Multiple definitions in glossary
--------------------------------
Key: FOR-1006
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006
Project: Forrest
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Plugin: input.skos
Affects Versions: 0.8
Reporter: Ross Gardler
Priority: Minor
In the original glossary plugin it was possible to have multiple definitions for an item. In the SKOS glossary handling this is not currently the case. Unless this is a limitation of the SKOS schema we should support multiple definitions.
In either case, the layout of the multiple definitions is untidy at present. Each definition needs to appear separately from the others.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (FOR-1006) Multiple definitions in glossary
Posted by "Ross Gardler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Ross Gardler closed FOR-1006.
-----------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Ross Gardler
Applied - thanks.
> Multiple definitions in glossary
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: FOR-1006
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006
> Project: Forrest
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Plugin: input.skos
> Affects Versions: 0.8
> Reporter: Ross Gardler
> Assignee: Ross Gardler
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: skos-definitions.patch
>
>
> In the original glossary plugin it was possible to have multiple definitions for an item. In the SKOS glossary handling this is not currently the case. Unless this is a limitation of the SKOS schema we should support multiple definitions.
> In either case, the layout of the multiple definitions is untidy at present. Each definition needs to appear separately from the others.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (FOR-1006) Multiple definitions in glossary
Posted by "David Crossley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
David Crossley updated FOR-1006:
--------------------------------
Affects Version/s: (was: 0.8)
0.9-dev
> Multiple definitions in glossary
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: FOR-1006
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006
> Project: Forrest
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Plugin: input.skos
> Affects Versions: 0.9-dev
> Reporter: Ross Gardler
> Assignee: Ross Gardler
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.9-dev
>
> Attachments: skos-definitions.patch
>
>
> In the original glossary plugin it was possible to have multiple definitions for an item. In the SKOS glossary handling this is not currently the case. Unless this is a limitation of the SKOS schema we should support multiple definitions.
> In either case, the layout of the multiple definitions is untidy at present. Each definition needs to appear separately from the others.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (FOR-1006) Multiple definitions in glossary
Posted by "SinDoc (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
SinDoc updated FOR-1006:
------------------------
Attachment: skos-definitions.patch
SKOS shouldn't have any problem with multiple definitions for a concept.
> Multiple definitions in glossary
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: FOR-1006
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006
> Project: Forrest
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Plugin: input.skos
> Affects Versions: 0.8
> Reporter: Ross Gardler
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: skos-definitions.patch
>
>
> In the original glossary plugin it was possible to have multiple definitions for an item. In the SKOS glossary handling this is not currently the case. Unless this is a limitation of the SKOS schema we should support multiple definitions.
> In either case, the layout of the multiple definitions is untidy at present. Each definition needs to appear separately from the others.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (FOR-1006) Multiple definitions in glossary
Posted by "David Crossley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
David Crossley closed FOR-1006.
-------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.9-dev
> Multiple definitions in glossary
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: FOR-1006
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006
> Project: Forrest
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Plugin: input.skos
> Affects Versions: 0.9-dev
> Reporter: Ross Gardler
> Assignee: Ross Gardler
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.9-dev
>
> Attachments: skos-definitions.patch
>
>
> In the original glossary plugin it was possible to have multiple definitions for an item. In the SKOS glossary handling this is not currently the case. Unless this is a limitation of the SKOS schema we should support multiple definitions.
> In either case, the layout of the multiple definitions is untidy at present. Each definition needs to appear separately from the others.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Reopened: (FOR-1006) Multiple definitions in glossary
Posted by "David Crossley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
David Crossley reopened FOR-1006:
---------------------------------
> Multiple definitions in glossary
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: FOR-1006
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006
> Project: Forrest
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Plugin: input.skos
> Affects Versions: 0.9-dev
> Reporter: Ross Gardler
> Assignee: Ross Gardler
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.9-dev
>
> Attachments: skos-definitions.patch
>
>
> In the original glossary plugin it was possible to have multiple definitions for an item. In the SKOS glossary handling this is not currently the case. Unless this is a limitation of the SKOS schema we should support multiple definitions.
> In either case, the layout of the multiple definitions is untidy at present. Each definition needs to appear separately from the others.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.