[jira] [Created] (STORM-3145) UNCOMMITTED_EARLIEST and UNCOMMITTED_LATEST doesn't work as expected

["Prakash N M (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

Prakash N M created STORM-3145:
----------------------------------

             Summary: UNCOMMITTED_EARLIEST and UNCOMMITTED_LATEST doesn't work as expected
                 Key: STORM-3145
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3145
             Project: Apache Storm
          Issue Type: Question
          Components: storm-kafka-client, trident
            Reporter: Prakash N M


I am using storm-kafka-client 1.2.2.

When I ran my topology I got NPE as mentioned in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3046.

So I modified the KafkaTridentSpoutEmitter.java#seek with patch mentioned in the Jira STORM-3046. Below is the modified code.
{noformat}
private long seek(TopicPartition tp, KafkaTridentSpoutBatchMetadata lastBatchMeta, long transactionId) {

if (isFirstPoll(tp, transactionId)) {

if (firstPollOffsetStrategy == EARLIEST) {

LOG.debug("First poll for topic partition [{}], seeking to partition beginning", tp);

kafkaConsumer.seekToBeginning(Collections.singleton(tp));

} else if (firstPollOffsetStrategy == LATEST) {

LOG.debug("First poll for topic partition [{}], seeking to partition end", tp);

kafkaConsumer.seekToEnd(Collections.singleton(tp));

} else if (lastBatchMeta != null) {

LOG.debug("First poll for topic partition [{}], using last batch metadata", tp);

kafkaConsumer.seek(tp, lastBatchMeta.getLastOffset() + 1); // seek next offset after last offset from previous batch

} else if (firstPollOffsetStrategy == UNCOMMITTED_EARLIEST) {

LOG.debug("First poll for topic partition [{}] with no last batch metadata, seeking to partition beginning", tp);

kafkaConsumer.seekToBeginning(Collections.singleton(tp));

} else if (firstPollOffsetStrategy == UNCOMMITTED_LATEST) {

LOG.debug("First poll for topic partition [{}] with no last batch metadata, seeking to partition end", tp);

kafkaConsumer.seekToEnd(Collections.singleton(tp));

}

firstPollTransaction.put(tp, transactionId);

} else if (lastBatchMeta != null) {
        kafkaConsumer.seek(tp, lastBatchMeta.getLastOffset() + 1);  // seek next offset after last offset from previous batch
        LOG.debug("First poll for topic partition [{}], using last batch metadata", tp);
} else {
        long initialFetchOffset = firstPollTransaction.get(tp);
        OffsetAndMetadata lastCommittedOffset = kafkaConsumer.committed(tp);
        kafkaConsumer.seek(tp, lastCommittedOffset.offset());
        LOG.debug("First poll for topic partition [{}], no last batch metadata present."
                  + " Using stored initial fetch offset [{}]", tp, initialFetchOffset);
}

    final long fetchOffset = kafkaConsumer.position(tp);
    LOG.debug("Set [fetchOffset = {}] for partition [{}]", fetchOffset, tp);
    return fetchOffset;
}{noformat}
Now after code change - when the offset strategy is UNCOMMITTED_EARLIEST for the very first time when it is the first poll for the spout, lastBatchMeta is null and the kafka consumer seeks to the beginning offset. Should I be checking for last commit and start from there? Likewise for the next fetch (when lastBatchMeta is not null), kafka consumer seeks to lastBatchMeta.getLastOffset() + 1. Should I be doing same here, checking for last commit?

 

 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)