You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cxf.apache.org by "Bozhong Lin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/05/17 04:55:16 UTC

[jira] Updated: (CXF-622) HTTPClientPolicy CacheControl type should accept parameters for some directives

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Bozhong Lin updated CXF-622:
----------------------------

        Fix Version/s: 2.0
             Assignee: willem Jiang
    Affects Version/s: 2.0-RC

> HTTPClientPolicy CacheControl type should accept parameters for some directives
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-622
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-622
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Configuration
>    Affects Versions: 2.0-RC
>         Environment: NA
>            Reporter: Steven E. Harris
>         Assigned To: willem Jiang
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> Per section 14.9 (Cache-Control) of RFC 2616 (HTTP 1.1), several of the Cache-Control directives require a parameter to make sense.
> "max-age" and "min-fresh" both require a non-negative integer parameter specifying seconds. "max-stale" can accept a similar parameter, though it is not required.
> At present, the HTTPClientPolicy class will accept values of the ClientCacheControlType enum, but has no way to accept these "delta seconds" parameters. Furthermore, HTTPConduit doesn't do any special formatting in its setHeadersByClientPolicy() method to accommodate such parameters.
> I suspect these cache control directives don't get changed much, but it's worth noting that the present interface allows invalid values to be specified, insofar as the resulting HTTP headers don't conform to the specification. Additionally, HTTP permits more than one directive to be specified, per the "1#cache-directive" rule.
> Of  course, fixing this requires some care. It may be worth just punting and letting the user specify the actual text of the directive, such as:
>   CacheControl="max-age=1000, max-stale"
> Capturing that in an enum is just too difficult.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.