You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org> on 2005/05/08 15:57:19 UTC
$Log$ in source files
Subversion doesn't support the $Log$ :
http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#log-in-source
As those $Log$ sections will be outdated, I think we should start
removing them.
Any thoughts ?
Re: $Log$ in source files
Posted by Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>.
+1 from me too, they make the javadocs look terrible.
Sean Schofield wrote:
>+1 for removing them. Subversion (and CVS) keeps the same history and
>they just clutter up the source code and documentation.
>
>
>On 5/9/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>SVN experts, is there really no alternative or backward compatibility solution?
>>:-(
>>-Manfred
>>
>>2005/5/8, Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org>:
>>
>>
>>> Yes, I found that nice too :-(
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 21:27 +0200, Martin Marinschek wrote:
>>> oh yes...
>>>
>>>what a pity, I liked that small tidbit of information!
>>>
>>>regards,
>>>
>>>Martin
>>>
>>>On 5/8/05, Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Subversion doesn't support the $Log$ :
>>>>http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#log-in-source
>>>>
>>>>As those $Log$ sections will be outdated, I think we should start removing
>>>>them.
>>>>
>>>>Any thoughts ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>.
>
>
>
Re: $Log$ in source files
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Marathon Man (LOL)
Thanks for the sacrifice. Don't bother with rerunning the javadoc. I
will do that within the next day or so. Hopefully I will also be able
to automate everything and we can have the website updated
continuously. Also I will take a look at the timestamp suggestion
made earlier so we don't constantly get the new javadocs to check in.
sean
On 5/11/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ;)
>
> well, what are you the marathon man for if not for that...
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 5/11/05, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com> wrote:
> > OK, it's done... sorry Manfred... if it's any consolation, it was
> > painful for me too - but only due to the repetitive-stress injury
> > suffered by pressing CTRL-Y seven million times...
> >
> >
> > Manfred Geiler wrote:
> >
> > >Oliver, I fear you are right. Here is my sad
> > >
> > >+1 for removing $Log$
> > >
> > >-Manfred
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: $Log$ in source files
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
;)
well, what are you the marathon man for if not for that...
regards,
Martin
On 5/11/05, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com> wrote:
> OK, it's done... sorry Manfred... if it's any consolation, it was
> painful for me too - but only due to the repetitive-stress injury
> suffered by pressing CTRL-Y seven million times...
>
>
> Manfred Geiler wrote:
>
> >Oliver, I fear you are right. Here is my sad
> >
> >+1 for removing $Log$
> >
> >-Manfred
> >
> >
>
>
Re: $Log$ in source files
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
Thanks very much.
SVN seems to be a lot faster. So requesting the history just in time
is a reasonable alternative.
-Manfred
On 5/11/05, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com> wrote:
> OK, it's done... sorry Manfred... if it's any consolation, it was
> painful for me too - but only due to the repetitive-stress injury
> suffered by pressing CTRL-Y seven million times...
>
>
> Manfred Geiler wrote:
>
> >Oliver, I fear you are right. Here is my sad
> >
> >+1 for removing $Log$
> >
> >-Manfred
> >
> >
>
>
Re: $Log$ in source files
Posted by Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>.
OK, it's done... sorry Manfred... if it's any consolation, it was
painful for me too - but only due to the repetitive-stress injury
suffered by pressing CTRL-Y seven million times...
Manfred Geiler wrote:
>Oliver, I fear you are right. Here is my sad
>
>+1 for removing $Log$
>
>-Manfred
>
>
Re: $Log$ in source files
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
Oliver, I fear you are right. Here is my sad
+1 for removing $Log$
-Manfred
2005/5/11, Oliver Rossmueller <ol...@tuxerra.com>:
> +1 for removing the $Log$ stuff. There is no support for the Log (or a
> similar) keyword in subversion so I suppose it's better to remove the
> log entries from the source files as they won't get any updates. As Sean
> said: all the information is in the svn logs anyway, no need from my POV
> to maintain the same information in the source files.
>
> Oliver
>
> Sean Schofield wrote:
>
> >+1 for removing them. Subversion (and CVS) keeps the same history and
> >they just clutter up the source code and documentation.
> >
> >
> >On 5/9/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>SVN experts, is there really no alternative or backward compatibility solution?
> >>:-(
> >>-Manfred
> >>
> >>2005/5/8, Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org>:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Yes, I found that nice too :-(
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 21:27 +0200, Martin Marinschek wrote:
> >>> oh yes...
> >>>
> >>>what a pity, I liked that small tidbit of information!
> >>>
> >>>regards,
> >>>
> >>>Martin
> >>>
> >>>On 5/8/05, Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Subversion doesn't support the $Log$ :
> >>>>http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#log-in-source
> >>>>
> >>>>As those $Log$ sections will be outdated, I think we should start removing
> >>>>them.
> >>>>
> >>>>Any thoughts ?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
> --
> Oliver Rossmueller
> Software Engineer and IT-Consultant
> Hamburg, Germany
> http://www.rossmueller.com
>
>
Re: $Log$ in source files
Posted by Oliver Rossmueller <ol...@tuxerra.com>.
+1 for removing the $Log$ stuff. There is no support for the Log (or a
similar) keyword in subversion so I suppose it's better to remove the
log entries from the source files as they won't get any updates. As Sean
said: all the information is in the svn logs anyway, no need from my POV
to maintain the same information in the source files.
Oliver
Sean Schofield wrote:
>+1 for removing them. Subversion (and CVS) keeps the same history and
>they just clutter up the source code and documentation.
>
>
>On 5/9/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>SVN experts, is there really no alternative or backward compatibility solution?
>>:-(
>>-Manfred
>>
>>2005/5/8, Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org>:
>>
>>
>>> Yes, I found that nice too :-(
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 21:27 +0200, Martin Marinschek wrote:
>>> oh yes...
>>>
>>>what a pity, I liked that small tidbit of information!
>>>
>>>regards,
>>>
>>>Martin
>>>
>>>On 5/8/05, Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Subversion doesn't support the $Log$ :
>>>>http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#log-in-source
>>>>
>>>>As those $Log$ sections will be outdated, I think we should start removing
>>>>them.
>>>>
>>>>Any thoughts ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
--
Oliver Rossmueller
Software Engineer and IT-Consultant
Hamburg, Germany
http://www.rossmueller.com
Re: $Log$ in source files
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
+1 for removing them. Subversion (and CVS) keeps the same history and
they just clutter up the source code and documentation.
On 5/9/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> SVN experts, is there really no alternative or backward compatibility solution?
> :-(
> -Manfred
>
> 2005/5/8, Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org>:
> > Yes, I found that nice too :-(
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 21:27 +0200, Martin Marinschek wrote:
> > oh yes...
> >
> > what a pity, I liked that small tidbit of information!
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 5/8/05, Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Subversion doesn't support the $Log$ :
> > > http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#log-in-source
> > >
> > > As those $Log$ sections will be outdated, I think we should start removing
> > > them.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts ?
> >
> >
>
Re: $Log$ in source files
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
SVN experts, is there really no alternative or backward compatibility solution?
:-(
-Manfred
2005/5/8, Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org>:
> Yes, I found that nice too :-(
>
>
> On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 21:27 +0200, Martin Marinschek wrote:
> oh yes...
>
> what a pity, I liked that small tidbit of information!
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 5/8/05, Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Subversion doesn't support the $Log$ :
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#log-in-source
> >
> > As those $Log$ sections will be outdated, I think we should start removing
> > them.
> >
> > Any thoughts ?
>
>
Re: $Log$ in source files
Posted by Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org>.
Yes, I found that nice too :-(
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 21:27 +0200, Martin Marinschek wrote:
> oh yes...
>
> what a pity, I liked that small tidbit of information!
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 5/8/05, Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Subversion doesn't support the $Log$ :
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#log-in-source
> >
> > As those $Log$ sections will be outdated, I think we should start removing
> > them.
> >
> > Any thoughts ?
Re: $Log$ in source files
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
oh yes...
what a pity, I liked that small tidbit of information!
regards,
Martin
On 5/8/05, Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org> wrote:
> Subversion doesn't support the $Log$ :
> http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#log-in-source
>
> As those $Log$ sections will be outdated, I think we should start removing
> them.
>
> Any thoughts ?