You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@rya.apache.org by "David W. Lotts (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/08/24 15:51:20 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (RYA-164) Move off of Gitflow
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15435151#comment-15435151 ]
David W. Lotts commented on RYA-164:
------------------------------------
You can change the default branch from master to another existing branch:
https://help.github.com/articles/setting-the-default-branch/#
I did it on my fork of Rya. When the main page and the PR page comes up, it shows the branch "develop" instead of "master".
> Move off of Gitflow
> -------------------
>
> Key: RYA-164
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-164
> Project: Rya
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Aaron Mihalik
>
> Gitflow on an Apache project is a bit annoying. I propose we follow the pattern of other Apache Projects (eg. NiFi, Spark, Accumulo) and have master (the default branch) contain the latest major release line under development.
> This would have a couple immediate benefits:
> 1. As committers, we have to manually pester contributors to close their pull requests after we merge their PRs. Instead we can use the GitHub "closes #<issue>" semantics to automatically close the PR after a merge.
> 2. As a community, we would be more aligned with other conventions used in Apache projects.
> 3. As developers, we have to be (slightly) more mindful where we point other developers. We have to make a point of saying "the 'develop' branch... not that default one"
> (I concede I'm really reaching for the last point :) )
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)