You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Juan Nin <ju...@gmail.com> on 2012/11/16 14:29:00 UTC
Broker and storage reference to persistence adapter, is this needed?
Hi!
I just came across this article, where it's mentioned that you need to
"explicitly specify a persistence adapter within the configuration file and
reference it from the broker and the storage definition":
http://open-source-adventures.blogspot.com/2009/01/limiting-disk-store-usage-with-active.html
I guess that was maybe on the past and not needed nowadays, right?
I've never done such a configuration, and my storage definitions seem to
work fine.
Thanks in advance.
Juan
Re: Broker and storage reference to persistence adapter, is this
needed?
Posted by kimmking <ki...@gmail.com>.
now kaha is the default option
发自我的 iPad
在 2012-11-16，21:29，"Juan Nin [via ActiveMQ]" <ml...@n4.nabble.com> 写道：
> Hi!
>
> I just came across this article, where it's mentioned that you need to
> "explicitly specify a persistence adapter within the configuration file and
> reference it from the broker and the storage definition":
>
> http://open-source-adventures.blogspot.com/2009/01/limiting-disk-store-usage-with-active.html
>
> I guess that was maybe on the past and not needed nowadays, right?
> I've never done such a configuration, and my storage definitions seem to
> work fine.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Juan
>
>
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Broker-and-storage-reference-to-persistence-adapter-is-this-needed-tp4659450.html
> To unsubscribe from ActiveMQ - User, click here.
> NAML
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Broker-and-storage-reference-to-persistence-adapter-is-this-needed-tp4659450p4659523.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Broker and storage reference to persistence adapter, is this needed?
Posted by Juan Nin <ju...@gmail.com>.
thought so, awesome, thanks for the quick reply! :)
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> fyi https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2064
>
>
> On 16 November 2012 13:35, Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > correct, that issue was resolved a good while back.
> >
> >
> > On 16 November 2012 13:29, Juan Nin <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I just came across this article, where it's mentioned that you need to
> >> "explicitly specify a persistence adapter within the configuration file
> >> and
> >> reference it from the broker and the storage definition":
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://open-source-adventures.blogspot.com/2009/01/limiting-disk-store-usage-with-active.html
> >>
> >> I guess that was maybe on the past and not needed nowadays, right?
> >> I've never done such a configuration, and my storage definitions seem to
> >> work fine.
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance.
> >>
> >> Juan
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://redhat.com
> > http://blog.garytully.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://redhat.com
> http://blog.garytully.com
>
Re: Broker and storage reference to persistence adapter, is this needed?
Posted by Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com>.
fyi https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2064
On 16 November 2012 13:35, Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> correct, that issue was resolved a good while back.
>
>
> On 16 November 2012 13:29, Juan Nin <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I just came across this article, where it's mentioned that you need to
>> "explicitly specify a persistence adapter within the configuration file
>> and
>> reference it from the broker and the storage definition":
>>
>>
>> http://open-source-adventures.blogspot.com/2009/01/limiting-disk-store-usage-with-active.html
>>
>> I guess that was maybe on the past and not needed nowadays, right?
>> I've never done such a configuration, and my storage definitions seem to
>> work fine.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Juan
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://redhat.com
> http://blog.garytully.com
>
--
http://redhat.com
http://blog.garytully.com
Re: Broker and storage reference to persistence adapter, is this needed?
Posted by Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com>.
correct, that issue was resolved a good while back.
On 16 November 2012 13:29, Juan Nin <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just came across this article, where it's mentioned that you need to
> "explicitly specify a persistence adapter within the configuration file and
> reference it from the broker and the storage definition":
>
>
> http://open-source-adventures.blogspot.com/2009/01/limiting-disk-store-usage-with-active.html
>
> I guess that was maybe on the past and not needed nowadays, right?
> I've never done such a configuration, and my storage definitions seem to
> work fine.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Juan
>
--
http://redhat.com
http://blog.garytully.com