You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by "Randall Leeds (Updated) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/12/23 00:19:30 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (COUCHDB-1293) Support in memory databases that can replicate

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Randall Leeds updated COUCHDB-1293:
-----------------------------------

    Skill Level: Committers Level (Medium to Hard)
     Issue Type: Wish  (was: New Feature)

Marking as a "Wish" and leaving it open with no fix version.

Alternate implementations are really hard to put into the code base right now since so much calls directly into couch_btree and couch_btree calls directly into couch_file. It'd be neat to see it done but it's not a blocker for anything afaik.
                
> Support in memory databases that can replicate
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-1293
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1293
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Sam Bisbee
>
> The summary really says it all. It would be great if we could have databases that live only in memory, but that could also be replicated to other URLs (potentially a database on disk or another node in a cluster).
> I don't think views would be necessary for the sorts of things you'd be doing all in memory (session data, temp data, etc.).
> I talked with Kocoloski about this around a month ago and it did not sound like an easy feat because of the replication. I would still like to hear what people have to say about it.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira