You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@trafficserver.apache.org by "Brian Geffon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/08/27 10:31:29 UTC
[jira] [Created] (TS-935) Shold EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same
as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
Shold EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
-----------------------------------------------------------
Key: TS-935
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935
Project: Traffic Server
Issue Type: Bug
Components: TS API
Affects Versions: 3.0.1
Reporter: Brian Geffon
When trying to use TSContCall with event = TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT I stumbled upon the fact that the API will decrement the event count for EVENT_INTERNAL or EVENT_IMMEDIATE (see INKContInternal::handle_event_count), but shouldn't we be able to do a TSContCall with TS_EVENT_IMMEDIAITE or TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT because as of now doing so would cause m_event_count to become -1 or shouldn't these defined values be something different?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (TS-935) Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same
as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
Posted by "Brian Geffon (Updated) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Brian Geffon updated TS-935:
----------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: Is this report clear, or should I elaborate more?)
> Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: TS API
> Affects Versions: 3.0.1
> Reporter: Brian Geffon
> Assignee: Brian Geffon
> Fix For: 3.1.3
>
>
> When trying to use TSContCall with event = TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT I stumbled upon the fact that the API will decrement the event count for EVENT_INTERNAL or EVENT_IMMEDIATE (see INKContInternal::handle_event_count), but shouldn't we be able to do a TSContCall with TS_EVENT_IMMEDIAITE or TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT because as of now doing so would cause m_event_count to become -1 or shouldn't these defined values be something different?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (TS-935) Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same
as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
Posted by "Alan M. Carroll (Updated) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Alan M. Carroll updated TS-935:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1.2)
3.1.3
> Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: TS API
> Affects Versions: 3.0.1
> Reporter: Brian Geffon
> Fix For: 3.1.3
>
>
> When trying to use TSContCall with event = TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT I stumbled upon the fact that the API will decrement the event count for EVENT_INTERNAL or EVENT_IMMEDIATE (see INKContInternal::handle_event_count), but shouldn't we be able to do a TSContCall with TS_EVENT_IMMEDIAITE or TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT because as of now doing so would cause m_event_count to become -1 or shouldn't these defined values be something different?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (TS-935) Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same
as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
Posted by "Brian Geffon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Brian Geffon updated TS-935:
----------------------------
Summary: Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT (was: Shold EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT)
> Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: TS API
> Affects Versions: 3.0.1
> Reporter: Brian Geffon
>
> When trying to use TSContCall with event = TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT I stumbled upon the fact that the API will decrement the event count for EVENT_INTERNAL or EVENT_IMMEDIATE (see INKContInternal::handle_event_count), but shouldn't we be able to do a TSContCall with TS_EVENT_IMMEDIAITE or TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT because as of now doing so would cause m_event_count to become -1 or shouldn't these defined values be something different?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (TS-935) Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same
as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
Posted by "Leif Hedstrom (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Leif Hedstrom updated TS-935:
-----------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.1.1
> Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: TS API
> Affects Versions: 3.0.1
> Reporter: Brian Geffon
> Fix For: 3.1.1
>
>
> When trying to use TSContCall with event = TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT I stumbled upon the fact that the API will decrement the event count for EVENT_INTERNAL or EVENT_IMMEDIATE (see INKContInternal::handle_event_count), but shouldn't we be able to do a TSContCall with TS_EVENT_IMMEDIAITE or TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT because as of now doing so would cause m_event_count to become -1 or shouldn't these defined values be something different?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (TS-935) Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the
same as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
Posted by "Brian Geffon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13093225#comment-13093225 ]
Brian Geffon commented on TS-935:
---------------------------------
Is this report clear, or should I elaborate more?
> Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: TS API
> Affects Versions: 3.0.1
> Reporter: Brian Geffon
>
> When trying to use TSContCall with event = TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT I stumbled upon the fact that the API will decrement the event count for EVENT_INTERNAL or EVENT_IMMEDIATE (see INKContInternal::handle_event_count), but shouldn't we be able to do a TSContCall with TS_EVENT_IMMEDIAITE or TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT because as of now doing so would cause m_event_count to become -1 or shouldn't these defined values be something different?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Assigned] (TS-935) Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same
as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
Posted by "Brian Geffon (Assigned) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Brian Geffon reassigned TS-935:
-------------------------------
Assignee: Brian Geffon
> Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: TS API
> Affects Versions: 3.0.1
> Reporter: Brian Geffon
> Assignee: Brian Geffon
> Fix For: 3.1.3
>
>
> When trying to use TSContCall with event = TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT I stumbled upon the fact that the API will decrement the event count for EVENT_INTERNAL or EVENT_IMMEDIATE (see INKContInternal::handle_event_count), but shouldn't we be able to do a TSContCall with TS_EVENT_IMMEDIAITE or TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT because as of now doing so would cause m_event_count to become -1 or shouldn't these defined values be something different?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (TS-935) Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same
as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
Posted by "Leif Hedstrom (Updated) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Leif Hedstrom updated TS-935:
-----------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1.1)
3.1.2
Moving all unassigned bugs out to 3.1.2
> Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: TS API
> Affects Versions: 3.0.1
> Reporter: Brian Geffon
> Fix For: 3.1.2
>
>
> When trying to use TSContCall with event = TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT I stumbled upon the fact that the API will decrement the event count for EVENT_INTERNAL or EVENT_IMMEDIATE (see INKContInternal::handle_event_count), but shouldn't we be able to do a TSContCall with TS_EVENT_IMMEDIAITE or TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT because as of now doing so would cause m_event_count to become -1 or shouldn't these defined values be something different?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (TS-935) Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same
as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
Posted by "Leif Hedstrom (Updated) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Leif Hedstrom updated TS-935:
-----------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1.4)
3.3.0
Moving out to 3.3.0, please move back if there will be a fix soon for v3.1.4.
> Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: TS API
> Affects Versions: 3.0.1
> Reporter: Brian Geffon
> Assignee: Brian Geffon
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
>
> When trying to use TSContCall with event = TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT I stumbled upon the fact that the API will decrement the event count for EVENT_INTERNAL or EVENT_IMMEDIATE (see INKContInternal::handle_event_count), but shouldn't we be able to do a TSContCall with TS_EVENT_IMMEDIAITE or TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT because as of now doing so would cause m_event_count to become -1 or shouldn't these defined values be something different?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira