You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@couchdb.apache.org by Mark Hahn <ma...@hahnca.com> on 2011/12/30 07:55:35 UTC
why isn't couch part of hadoop?
I noticed the rather large number of apache data solutions in hadoop and I
am curious why couchdb isn't included. Just curious.
Re: why isn't couch part of hadoop?
Posted by Mark Hahn <ma...@hahnca.com>.
Ah. I didn't realize it was a Java thingie. Thanks.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Andrey Cherkashin <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Because hadoop is a java framework? And CouchDB is lightweight portable
> "database engine" written in erlang?
> On Dec 29, 2011, at 10:55 PM, Mark Hahn wrote:
>
> > I noticed the rather large number of apache data solutions in hadoop and
> I
> > am curious why couchdb isn't included. Just curious.
>
>
Re: why isn't couch part of hadoop?
Posted by Andrey Cherkashin <an...@gmail.com>.
Because hadoop is a java framework? And CouchDB is lightweight portable "database engine" written in erlang?
On Dec 29, 2011, at 10:55 PM, Mark Hahn wrote:
> I noticed the rather large number of apache data solutions in hadoop and I
> am curious why couchdb isn't included. Just curious.
Re: why isn't couch part of hadoop?
Posted by Andrey Cherkashin <an...@gmail.com>.
Because hadoop is a java framework? And CouchDB is lightweight portable database engine"written in erlang?
On Dec 29, 2011, at 10:55 PM, Mark Hahn wrote:
> I noticed the rather large number of apache data solutions in hadoop and I
> am curious why couchdb isn't included. Just curious.
Re: why isn't couch part of hadoop?
Posted by Benjamin Campbell <be...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Gauthier, Alexander <
Alexander.Gauthier@teradata.com> wrote:
> Good question... been asking myself the same... but with UnQL in the
> pipeline, one wonders if SQL Lite/CouchDB/MongoDB may not just take a life
> of their own...
> couch
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Hahn [mailto:mark@hahnca.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 10:56 PM
> To: couchdb-user@apache.org
> Subject: why isn't couch part of hadoop?
>
> I noticed the rather large number of apache data solutions in hadoop and I
> am curious why couchdb isn't included. Just curious.
>
Since the CouchDB is a restful interface, I don't see whey someone couldn't
write an abstraction in Java to allow CouchDB interaction. It would seem
like overkill running a map/reduce and calling secondary map/reduce jobs.
But I could see conf/meta information being a good candidate for CouchDB
while using Hadoop.
--
Ben Campbell <be...@gmail.com>
RE: why isn't couch part of hadoop?
Posted by "Gauthier, Alexander" <Al...@Teradata.com>.
Good question... been asking myself the same... but with UnQL in the pipeline, one wonders if SQL Lite/CouchDB/MongoDB may not just take a life of their own...
couch
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Hahn [mailto:mark@hahnca.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 10:56 PM
To: couchdb-user@apache.org
Subject: why isn't couch part of hadoop?
I noticed the rather large number of apache data solutions in hadoop and I am curious why couchdb isn't included. Just curious.