You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@mesos.apache.org by Andrei Sekretenko <as...@mesosphere.io> on 2020/08/06 16:08:43 UTC

Review Request 72744: Added a scheduler API test for a valid offer constraints update.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for mesos and Benjamin Mahler.


Bugs: MESOS-10171
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-10171


Repository: mesos


Description
-------

Added a scheduler API test for a valid offer constraints update.


Diffs
-----

  src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp 514647dd2fbd4b901b5f57a81fded949af12432a 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/diff/1/


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Andrei Sekretenko


Re: Review Request 72744: Added a scheduler API test for a valid offer constraints update.

Posted by Andrei Sekretenko <as...@mesosphere.io>.

> On Aug. 19, 2020, 6:18 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
> > Lines 761-770 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/diff/2/?file=2238080#file2238080line761>
> >
> >     Per comment on previous review, could consider using json for this? (ditto below)

I'm inclined to set constraints via protobuf methods in this specific case: I would rather be explicit that the role in constraint is synchronized with `FrameworkInfo`. 
Given that, and also that the constraints themselves are very simple, and adding the need to pull `OfferConstraints` into `Subscribe`/`UpdateFramework`, I doubt that JSON will be of much help here,


> On Aug. 19, 2020, 6:18 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
> > Lines 789-798 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/diff/2/?file=2238080#file2238080line789>
> >
> >     Hm.. I would have guessed this reads from the /frameworks endpoint (or v1 GET_FRAMEWORKS call) to check the state change.
> >     
> >     Testing that it gets propagated to the allocator also make sense though.
> >     
> >     Perhaps we should check both?

Good point! We definitely should, after they are exposed. Added a JIRA for that and TODO here.


- Andrei


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/#review221643
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 20, 2020, 8:58 a.m., Andrei Sekretenko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 20, 2020, 8:58 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-10171
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-10171
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added a scheduler API test for a valid offer constraints update.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp 514647dd2fbd4b901b5f57a81fded949af12432a 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrei Sekretenko
> 
>


Re: Review Request 72744: Added a scheduler API test for a valid offer constraints update.

Posted by Benjamin Mahler <bm...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/#review221643
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!





src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
Lines 755 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/#comment310713>

    Maybe this is more consistent?
    
    ```
    EXPECT_CALL(*scheduler, connected(_))
      .WillOnce(Invoke([](Mesos* mesos) {
        XXX
      }));
    ```



src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
Lines 761-770 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/#comment310714>

    Per comment on previous review, could consider using json for this? (ditto below)



src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp
Lines 789-798 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/#comment310715>

    Hm.. I would have guessed this reads from the /frameworks endpoint (or v1 GET_FRAMEWORKS call) to check the state change.
    
    Testing that it gets propagated to the allocator also make sense though.
    
    Perhaps we should check both?


- Benjamin Mahler


On Aug. 14, 2020, 4:59 p.m., Andrei Sekretenko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 14, 2020, 4:59 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-10171
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-10171
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added a scheduler API test for a valid offer constraints update.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp 514647dd2fbd4b901b5f57a81fded949af12432a 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrei Sekretenko
> 
>


Re: Review Request 72744: Added a scheduler API test for a valid offer constraints update.

Posted by Andrei Sekretenko <as...@mesosphere.io>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Aug. 20, 2020, 8:58 a.m.)


Review request for mesos and Benjamin Mahler.


Bugs: MESOS-10171
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-10171


Repository: mesos


Description
-------

Added a scheduler API test for a valid offer constraints update.


Diffs (updated)
-----

  src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp 514647dd2fbd4b901b5f57a81fded949af12432a 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/diff/3/

Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/diff/2-3/


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Andrei Sekretenko


Re: Review Request 72744: Added a scheduler API test for a valid offer constraints update.

Posted by Andrei Sekretenko <as...@mesosphere.io>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Aug. 14, 2020, 4:59 p.m.)


Review request for mesos and Benjamin Mahler.


Bugs: MESOS-10171
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-10171


Repository: mesos


Description
-------

Added a scheduler API test for a valid offer constraints update.


Diffs (updated)
-----

  src/tests/master/update_framework_tests.cpp 514647dd2fbd4b901b5f57a81fded949af12432a 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/diff/2/

Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72744/diff/1-2/


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Andrei Sekretenko