You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@struts.apache.org by "Lukasz Lenart (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/03/20 18:57:04 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (WW-4306) After WW-3330, <@s.action> broken in non-sitemesh freemarker templates

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13942060#comment-13942060 ] 

Lukasz Lenart commented on WW-4306:
-----------------------------------

Yes, please prepare a minimal demo app - it will help to debug the problem.

> After WW-3330, <@s.action> broken in non-sitemesh freemarker templates
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WW-4306
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4306
>             Project: Struts 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Plugin - SiteMesh
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.16.1
>            Reporter: Brandon Ramirez
>              Labels: freemarker, regression
>
> After upgrading from Struts 2.1.8.1 to 2.3.16.1, we observed that if a Sitemesh Freemarker decorator used <@s.action> to include another action, the action's Freemarker view output is not rendered.
> This is identical to what WW-3330 describes, which is reported fixed in 2.2.3.
> The documentation (http://struts.apache.org/release/2.3.x/docs/sitemesh-plugin.html) specifies to use com.opensymphony.sitemesh.webapp.SiteMeshFilter.  The fix in WW-3330 applies to org.apache.struts2.sitemesh.FreemarkerPageFilter, a sub-class of SiteMeshFilter.  Using SiteMeshFilter as the documentation specifies, WW-3330 does not appear resolved.
> If I change my web.xml to use FreemarkerPageFilter instead of SiteMeshFilter, the WW-3330 problem is resolved, but now <@s.action> fails to render Freemarker output when *not* included via Sitemesh decorators.
> Judging by the number of configuration changes (servlets and filters) in 2.2, it is possible that I have web.xml configured incorrectly.  If that is the case, feel free to throw your tomatoes :)  But I have triple checked and at this point I am wondering if this is a regression from WW-3330.
> If needed, I can try to put together a minimal web app to reproduce the problem.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)