You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by Sean Lin <se...@gmail.com> on 2009/04/02 05:22:27 UTC
container questions
Hi,
I have a couple of questions:
1. Will adding a jquery feature to allow for <Require
feature="jquery"/> cause any problems with gadget rendering?
2. I'm trying to get VS to recognise OS gadget XML files. The 2 files
that define them are the following?
http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/0.8/gadgets/gadgets-exte
nded.xsd
http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/0.8/gadgets/gadgets.xsd
Cheers,
Sean
Re: container questions
Posted by ar...@leroymerlin.fr.
"Sean Lin" <se...@gmail.com> writes:
> Well each gadget does not have to use it, hence the <Require> option. But
> then again it's up to the developer just to put in a script tag if they
> really want to use jquery to create their gadget. Just thought it might
> render faster if the container was serving it directly.
>
> When you said it just works on your container, I'm guessing you have
> everything running on a single domain.
>
Not always. We sometimes separate the shindig server and the main
application server. But yes, we basically control every gadget's
content.
Did anybody on this list tried to factorize such things as jQuery ?
When I was talking about concerns, I hinted at our own performance
issues: having 5 gadgets on a page each loading jquery plus a handful
of plugins put IE6 on his knees.
More generally, I'd rather have injection of such services in the
container. I know however that container/gadget communication may be
hard for different origins.
--
Arnaud Bailly, PhD
Leroy-Merlin - SIF - Projet Portail
Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont établis à l'attention exclusive de leurs destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le détruire et d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur. L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'intégrité de ce message, le contenu de ce message ne représente en aucun cas un engagement de la part de Leroy Merlin.
RE: container questions
Posted by Sean Lin <se...@gmail.com>.
Well each gadget does not have to use it, hence the <Require> option. But
then again it's up to the developer just to put in a script tag if they
really want to use jquery to create their gadget. Just thought it might
render faster if the container was serving it directly.
When you said it just works on your container, I'm guessing you have
everything running on a single domain.
-----Original Message-----
From: arnaud.bailly@leroymerlin.fr [mailto:arnaud.bailly@leroymerlin.fr]
Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2009 3:15 PM
To: shindig-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: container questions
"Sean Lin" <se...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> 1. Will adding a jquery feature to allow for <Require
> feature="jquery"/> cause any problems with gadget rendering?
>
We already do this in our container: it just works. I have concerns
however about page bloat: importing jquery in each gadget does not
seem very efficient. Isn't there a way to factorize this ? Using RPC
maybe ?
Regards,
--
Arnaud Bailly, PhD
Leroy-Merlin - SIF - Projet Portail
Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont établis à l'attention exclusive
de leurs destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par
erreur, merci de le détruire et d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur.
L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'intégrité de ce message, le contenu
de ce message ne représente en aucun cas un engagement de la part de Leroy
Merlin.
Re: container questions
Posted by ar...@leroymerlin.fr.
"Sean Lin" <se...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> 1. Will adding a jquery feature to allow for <Require
> feature="jquery"/> cause any problems with gadget rendering?
>
We already do this in our container: it just works. I have concerns
however about page bloat: importing jquery in each gadget does not
seem very efficient. Isn't there a way to factorize this ? Using RPC
maybe ?
Regards,
--
Arnaud Bailly, PhD
Leroy-Merlin - SIF - Projet Portail
Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont établis à l'attention exclusive de leurs destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le détruire et d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur. L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'intégrité de ce message, le contenu de ce message ne représente en aucun cas un engagement de la part de Leroy Merlin.