You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> on 2008/09/19 18:39:40 UTC
1.3.2 RC0
I've put the basic distribution artifacts and the rat file for 1.3.2 up here
(http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/>).
No maven artifacts yet.
As I was doing it I noticed some problems with the RAT file (It looks like a
couple of files have crept in without Apache headers) so we're going to have
to do an RC1 but I thought it would be useful to have people look at this
anyhow to see if everything is OK before we vote.
Can someone take a look at the RAT issues as I'm just off home.
Thanks
Simon
Re: 1.3.2 RC0
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:35 PM, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Can any of your tests be contributed to Tuscany functional test suite so
>> that it can be run on a regular basis?
>>
>> Haleh
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Simon,
>>>
>>> We've got a suite of tests that we can run against a maven repository
>>> to test a number of scenarios, so the sooner the better, but obviously
>>> if RC1 isn't far away then I guess we can wait for that!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Dave.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hey guys,
>>> >>
>>> >> Should we expect a maven distribution for this, or will that only be
>>> >> present in RC1?
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >>
>>> >> Dave.
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Simon Laws <
>>> simonslaws@googlemail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > I've put the basic distribution artifacts and the rat file for 1.3.2
>>> up
>>> >> > here
>>> >> > (http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/>).
>>> No maven artifacts
>>> >> > yet.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > As I was doing it I noticed some problems with the RAT file (It
>>> looks
>>> >> > like a
>>> >> > couple of files have crept in without Apache headers) so we're going
>>> to
>>> >> > have
>>> >> > to do an RC1 but I thought it would be useful to have people look at
>>> >> > this
>>> >> > anyhow to see if everything is OK before we vote.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Can someone take a look at the RAT issues as I'm just off home.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Thanks
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Simon
>>> >> >
>>> >
>>> > Hi Dave
>>> >
>>> > I was going to wait until RC1 but I could do one if it helps.
>>> >
>>> > Simon
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
> I've put some maven artifacts up for 1.3.2 RC0 for people to look at. There
> still seems to be something strange about TUSCANY-2531 so it'll take a
> little time to run that to ground.
>
> Simon
>
Ok, so I think we are pretty much don't with the issues that came out of
RC0. I'm fixing up a license issues then I'll post an RC1 and start a vote.
Thanks
Simon
Re: 1.3.2 RC0
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:35 PM, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Can any of your tests be contributed to Tuscany functional test suite so
> that it can be run on a regular basis?
>
> Haleh
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hey Simon,
>>
>> We've got a suite of tests that we can run against a maven repository
>> to test a number of scenarios, so the sooner the better, but obviously
>> if RC1 isn't far away then I guess we can wait for that!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dave.
>>
>> --
>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hey guys,
>> >>
>> >> Should we expect a maven distribution for this, or will that only be
>> >> present in RC1?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >>
>> >> Dave.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Simon Laws <simonslaws@googlemail.com
>> >
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > I've put the basic distribution artifacts and the rat file for 1.3.2
>> up
>> >> > here
>> >> > (http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/>).
>> No maven artifacts
>> >> > yet.
>> >> >
>> >> > As I was doing it I noticed some problems with the RAT file (It looks
>> >> > like a
>> >> > couple of files have crept in without Apache headers) so we're going
>> to
>> >> > have
>> >> > to do an RC1 but I thought it would be useful to have people look at
>> >> > this
>> >> > anyhow to see if everything is OK before we vote.
>> >> >
>> >> > Can someone take a look at the RAT issues as I'm just off home.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> > Simon
>> >> >
>> >
>> > Hi Dave
>> >
>> > I was going to wait until RC1 but I could do one if it helps.
>> >
>> > Simon
>> >
>>
>
>
I've put some maven artifacts up for 1.3.2 RC0 for people to look at. There
still seems to be something strange about TUSCANY-2531 so it'll take a
little time to run that to ground.
Simon
Re: 1.3.2 RC0
Posted by haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dave,
Can any of your tests be contributed to Tuscany functional test suite so
that it can be run on a regular basis?
Haleh
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hey Simon,
>
> We've got a suite of tests that we can run against a maven repository
> to test a number of scenarios, so the sooner the better, but obviously
> if RC1 isn't far away then I guess we can wait for that!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
> --
> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> Should we expect a maven distribution for this, or will that only be
> >> present in RC1?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Dave.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > I've put the basic distribution artifacts and the rat file for 1.3.2
> up
> >> > here
> >> > (http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/). No maven
> artifacts
> >> > yet.
> >> >
> >> > As I was doing it I noticed some problems with the RAT file (It looks
> >> > like a
> >> > couple of files have crept in without Apache headers) so we're going
> to
> >> > have
> >> > to do an RC1 but I thought it would be useful to have people look at
> >> > this
> >> > anyhow to see if everything is OK before we vote.
> >> >
> >> > Can someone take a look at the RAT issues as I'm just off home.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> > Simon
> >> >
> >
> > Hi Dave
> >
> > I was going to wait until RC1 but I could do one if it helps.
> >
> > Simon
> >
>
Re: 1.3.2 RC0
Posted by Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>.
Hey Simon,
We've got a suite of tests that we can run against a maven repository
to test a number of scenarios, so the sooner the better, but obviously
if RC1 isn't far away then I guess we can wait for that!
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Should we expect a maven distribution for this, or will that only be
>> present in RC1?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dave.
>>
>> --
>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I've put the basic distribution artifacts and the rat file for 1.3.2 up
>> > here
>> > (http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/). No maven artifacts
>> > yet.
>> >
>> > As I was doing it I noticed some problems with the RAT file (It looks
>> > like a
>> > couple of files have crept in without Apache headers) so we're going to
>> > have
>> > to do an RC1 but I thought it would be useful to have people look at
>> > this
>> > anyhow to see if everything is OK before we vote.
>> >
>> > Can someone take a look at the RAT issues as I'm just off home.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Simon
>> >
>
> Hi Dave
>
> I was going to wait until RC1 but I could do one if it helps.
>
> Simon
>
Re: 1.3.2 RC0
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Should we expect a maven distribution for this, or will that only be
> present in RC1?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
> --
> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > I've put the basic distribution artifacts and the rat file for 1.3.2 up
> here
> > (http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/>).
> No maven artifacts
> > yet.
> >
> > As I was doing it I noticed some problems with the RAT file (It looks
> like a
> > couple of files have crept in without Apache headers) so we're going to
> have
> > to do an RC1 but I thought it would be useful to have people look at this
> > anyhow to see if everything is OK before we vote.
> >
> > Can someone take a look at the RAT issues as I'm just off home.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Simon
> >
>
Hi Dave
I was going to wait until RC1 but I could do one if it helps.
Simon
Re: 1.3.2 RC0
Posted by Dave Sowerby <da...@gmail.com>.
Hey guys,
Should we expect a maven distribution for this, or will that only be
present in RC1?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I've put the basic distribution artifacts and the rat file for 1.3.2 up here
> (http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/). No maven artifacts
> yet.
>
> As I was doing it I noticed some problems with the RAT file (It looks like a
> couple of files have crept in without Apache headers) so we're going to have
> to do an RC1 but I thought it would be useful to have people look at this
> anyhow to see if everything is OK before we vote.
>
> Can someone take a look at the RAT issues as I'm just off home.
>
> Thanks
>
> Simon
>