You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@felix.apache.org by Fabio Fonseca <fa...@gmail.com> on 2012/04/09 03:59:14 UTC

Cannot name an instance of a composite inside another composite using 1.9.0-snapshot

Hi All,

I'm having a problem when trying to name an instance of a composite when I
instantiate it inside another composite. My metadata is below:

<ipojo>

<composite name="comanche.requestHandler">
	<instance
component="org.apache.comanche.requestDispatcher.RequestDispatcher"
name="RequestDispatcher"/>
	<instance component="FileRH"/>
	<instance component="ErrorRH"/>
	<provides action="export"
	          specification="org.apache.comanche.services.RequestHandler"
	          filter="(instance.name=RequestDispatcher)" />
</composite>

<composite name="comanche.backend">
	<instance component="comanche.requestHandler" name="mytest123" />
</composite>

<instance component="comanche.backend" name="teste" />

</ipojo>

You can see the instance name in the bold part. When I compile my bundle
without that bold part, the higher level composite instance is valid, but
when I use the "mytest123" name, the instance became invalid and I see a
stack trace in my console that begins with:


[ERROR] FileRH : The configuration is not acceptable : Name already used
[ERROR] comanche.requestHandler : A factory is available for the
configuration but the configuration is not acceptable
org.apache.felix.ipojo.UnacceptableConfiguration: FileRH : Name already used
: mytest123
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.IPojoFactory.createComponentInstance(IPojoFactory.java:290)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.FactoryProxy.createComponentInstance(FactoryProxy.java:87)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.__createInstance(InstanceHandler.java:160)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.createInstance(InstanceHandler.java)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.__bindFactory(InstanceHandler.java:184)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.bindFactory(InstanceHandler.java)
	at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2.invoke(Unknown Source)
	at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.util.Callback.call(Callback.java:260)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyCallback.callOnInstance(DependencyCallback.java:309)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.Dependency.invokeCallback(Dependency.java:315)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.Dependency.onObjectCreation(Dependency.java:280)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyHandler.__onCreation(DependencyHandler.java:643)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyHandler.onCreation(DependencyHandler.java)
	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.HandlerManager.start(HandlerManager.java:132)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.CompositeManager.start(CompositeManager.java:355)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.CompositeFactory.createInstance(CompositeFactory.java:147)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.IPojoFactory.createComponentInstance(IPojoFactory.java:301)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.__createInstance(InstanceHandler.java:160)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.createInstance(InstanceHandler.java)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.__bindFactory(InstanceHandler.java:184)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.bindFactory(InstanceHandler.java)
	at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2.invoke(Unknown Source)
	at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.util.Callback.call(Callback.java:260)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyCallback.callOnInstance(DependencyCallback.java:309)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.Dependency.invokeCallback(Dependency.java:315)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.Dependency.onObjectCreation(Dependency.java:280)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyHandler.__onCreation(DependencyHandler.java:643)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyHandler.onCreation(DependencyHandler.java)
	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.HandlerManager.start(HandlerManager.java:132)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.CompositeManager.start(CompositeManager.java:355)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.CompositeFactory.createInstance(CompositeFactory.java:147)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.IPojoFactory.createComponentInstance(IPojoFactory.java:301)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.IPojoFactory.createComponentInstance(IPojoFactory.java:238)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.InstanceCreator$ManagedInstance.create(InstanceCreator.java:343)
	at
org.apache.felix.ipojo.InstanceCreator.addInstance(InstanceCreator.java:89)
	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.Extender.parse(Extender.java:306)
	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.Extender.startManagementFor(Extender.java:237)
	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.Extender.access$600(Extender.java:52)
	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.Extender$CreatorThread.run(Extender.java:769)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)

Apparently it is mixing the instances with other names... pretty weird...
:-/

I'm using the following bundles, all downloaded and compiled today:

START LEVEL 1
   ID   State         Level  Name
[   0] [Active     ] [    0] System Bundle (4.0.2)
[   1] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix Bundle Repository (1.6.6)
[   2] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix iPOJO (1.9.0.SNAPSHOT)
[   3] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix iPOJO API (1.7.0.SNAPSHOT)
[   4] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix iPOJO Arch Command
(1.7.0.SNAPSHOT)
[   5] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix iPOJO Composite (1.9.0.SNAPSHOT)
[   6] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix Shell Service (1.4.2)
[   7] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix Shell TUI (1.4.1)


Regards,
Fabio

P.S.: When I start this composite bundle, I receive a warning about the
instance "name" attribute that was deprecated. It tells me to use
"instance.name". However, the "instance.name" seems not to be working,
because, when I use it, the instance do not receive the name I desire. So I
kept using the "name", who is working, even knowing it was deprecated.
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Cannot-name-an-instance-of-a-composite-inside-another-composite-using-1.9.0-snapshot-tp33653319p33653319.html
Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org


Re: Cannot name an instance of a composite inside another composite using 1.9.0-snapshot

Posted by Fabio Fonseca <fa...@gmail.com>.
Hi Clement!


clement escoffier wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The instance name must be globally unique. This constraints comes from the
> usage of this name as service.pid which must be unique for the whole
> platform).
> 
> 

But if you see the metadata below, I have not used the same instance.name
for more than one instance. They are all unique. And the messages in the
stack trace are point the instance.name error for the wrong instances, that
were not named at all. (for example, the "mytest123" related to the FileRH
component). Can this be a bug too? Perhaps related to the instance.name
attribute problem?


clement escoffier wrote:
> 
> 
> About instance.name / name, it seems to be a bug, could you open an issue
> ?
> 
> 

I have opened the issue. I think the name of the issue is FELIX-3451. Never
opened one of those, so, I'm sorry if I got the wrong number. :-)

Thanks,

Fabio


clement escoffier wrote:
> 
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Clement 
> 
> On 09.04.2012, at 03:59, Fabio Fonseca wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I'm having a problem when trying to name an instance of a composite when
>> I
>> instantiate it inside another composite. My metadata is below:
>> 
>> <ipojo>
>> 
>> <composite name="comanche.requestHandler">
>> 	<instance
>> component="org.apache.comanche.requestDispatcher.RequestDispatcher"
>> name="RequestDispatcher"/>
>> 	<instance component="FileRH"/>
>> 	<instance component="ErrorRH"/>
>> 	<provides action="export"
>> 	          specification="org.apache.comanche.services.RequestHandler"
>> 	          filter="(instance.name=RequestDispatcher)" />
>> </composite>
>> 
>> <composite name="comanche.backend">
>> 	<instance component="comanche.requestHandler" name="mytest123" />
>> </composite>
>> 
>> <instance component="comanche.backend" name="teste" />
>> 
>> </ipojo>
>> 
>> You can see the instance name in the bold part. When I compile my bundle
>> without that bold part, the higher level composite instance is valid, but
>> when I use the "mytest123" name, the instance became invalid and I see a
>> stack trace in my console that begins with:
>> 
>> 
>> [ERROR] FileRH : The configuration is not acceptable : Name already used
>> [ERROR] comanche.requestHandler : A factory is available for the
>> configuration but the configuration is not acceptable
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.UnacceptableConfiguration: FileRH : Name already
>> used
>> : mytest123
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.IPojoFactory.createComponentInstance(IPojoFactory.java:290)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.FactoryProxy.createComponentInstance(FactoryProxy.java:87)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.__createInstance(InstanceHandler.java:160)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.createInstance(InstanceHandler.java)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.__bindFactory(InstanceHandler.java:184)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.bindFactory(InstanceHandler.java)
>> 	at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2.invoke(Unknown Source)
>> 	at
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>> 	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>> 	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.util.Callback.call(Callback.java:260)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyCallback.callOnInstance(DependencyCallback.java:309)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.Dependency.invokeCallback(Dependency.java:315)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.Dependency.onObjectCreation(Dependency.java:280)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyHandler.__onCreation(DependencyHandler.java:643)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyHandler.onCreation(DependencyHandler.java)
>> 	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.HandlerManager.start(HandlerManager.java:132)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.CompositeManager.start(CompositeManager.java:355)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.CompositeFactory.createInstance(CompositeFactory.java:147)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.IPojoFactory.createComponentInstance(IPojoFactory.java:301)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.__createInstance(InstanceHandler.java:160)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.createInstance(InstanceHandler.java)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.__bindFactory(InstanceHandler.java:184)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.bindFactory(InstanceHandler.java)
>> 	at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2.invoke(Unknown Source)
>> 	at
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>> 	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>> 	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.util.Callback.call(Callback.java:260)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyCallback.callOnInstance(DependencyCallback.java:309)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.Dependency.invokeCallback(Dependency.java:315)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.Dependency.onObjectCreation(Dependency.java:280)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyHandler.__onCreation(DependencyHandler.java:643)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyHandler.onCreation(DependencyHandler.java)
>> 	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.HandlerManager.start(HandlerManager.java:132)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.CompositeManager.start(CompositeManager.java:355)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.CompositeFactory.createInstance(CompositeFactory.java:147)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.IPojoFactory.createComponentInstance(IPojoFactory.java:301)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.IPojoFactory.createComponentInstance(IPojoFactory.java:238)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.InstanceCreator$ManagedInstance.create(InstanceCreator.java:343)
>> 	at
>> org.apache.felix.ipojo.InstanceCreator.addInstance(InstanceCreator.java:89)
>> 	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.Extender.parse(Extender.java:306)
>> 	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.Extender.startManagementFor(Extender.java:237)
>> 	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.Extender.access$600(Extender.java:52)
>> 	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.Extender$CreatorThread.run(Extender.java:769)
>> 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)
>> 
>> Apparently it is mixing the instances with other names... pretty weird...
>> :-/
>> 
>> I'm using the following bundles, all downloaded and compiled today:
>> 
>> START LEVEL 1
>>   ID   State         Level  Name
>> [   0] [Active     ] [    0] System Bundle (4.0.2)
>> [   1] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix Bundle Repository (1.6.6)
>> [   2] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix iPOJO (1.9.0.SNAPSHOT)
>> [   3] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix iPOJO API (1.7.0.SNAPSHOT)
>> [   4] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix iPOJO Arch Command
>> (1.7.0.SNAPSHOT)
>> [   5] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix iPOJO Composite
>> (1.9.0.SNAPSHOT)
>> [   6] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix Shell Service (1.4.2)
>> [   7] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix Shell TUI (1.4.1)
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Fabio
>> 
>> P.S.: When I start this composite bundle, I receive a warning about the
>> instance "name" attribute that was deprecated. It tells me to use
>> "instance.name". However, the "instance.name" seems not to be working,
>> because, when I use it, the instance do not receive the name I desire. So
>> I
>> kept using the "name", who is working, even knowing it was deprecated.
>> -- 
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/Cannot-name-an-instance-of-a-composite-inside-another-composite-using-1.9.0-snapshot-tp33653319p33653319.html
>> Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Cannot-name-an-instance-of-a-composite-inside-another-composite-using-1.9.0-snapshot-tp33653319p33660757.html
Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org


Re: Cannot name an instance of a composite inside another composite using 1.9.0-snapshot

Posted by Clement Escoffier <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi,

The instance name must be globally unique. This constraints comes from the usage of this name as service.pid which must be unique for the whole platform).

About instance.name / name, it seems to be a bug, could you open an issue ?

Regards,

Clement

On 09.04.2012, at 03:59, Fabio Fonseca wrote:

> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I'm having a problem when trying to name an instance of a composite when I
> instantiate it inside another composite. My metadata is below:
> 
> <ipojo>
> 
> <composite name="comanche.requestHandler">
> 	<instance
> component="org.apache.comanche.requestDispatcher.RequestDispatcher"
> name="RequestDispatcher"/>
> 	<instance component="FileRH"/>
> 	<instance component="ErrorRH"/>
> 	<provides action="export"
> 	          specification="org.apache.comanche.services.RequestHandler"
> 	          filter="(instance.name=RequestDispatcher)" />
> </composite>
> 
> <composite name="comanche.backend">
> 	<instance component="comanche.requestHandler" name="mytest123" />
> </composite>
> 
> <instance component="comanche.backend" name="teste" />
> 
> </ipojo>
> 
> You can see the instance name in the bold part. When I compile my bundle
> without that bold part, the higher level composite instance is valid, but
> when I use the "mytest123" name, the instance became invalid and I see a
> stack trace in my console that begins with:
> 
> 
> [ERROR] FileRH : The configuration is not acceptable : Name already used
> [ERROR] comanche.requestHandler : A factory is available for the
> configuration but the configuration is not acceptable
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.UnacceptableConfiguration: FileRH : Name already used
> : mytest123
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.IPojoFactory.createComponentInstance(IPojoFactory.java:290)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.FactoryProxy.createComponentInstance(FactoryProxy.java:87)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.__createInstance(InstanceHandler.java:160)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.createInstance(InstanceHandler.java)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.__bindFactory(InstanceHandler.java:184)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.bindFactory(InstanceHandler.java)
> 	at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2.invoke(Unknown Source)
> 	at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> 	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> 	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.util.Callback.call(Callback.java:260)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyCallback.callOnInstance(DependencyCallback.java:309)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.Dependency.invokeCallback(Dependency.java:315)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.Dependency.onObjectCreation(Dependency.java:280)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyHandler.__onCreation(DependencyHandler.java:643)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyHandler.onCreation(DependencyHandler.java)
> 	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.HandlerManager.start(HandlerManager.java:132)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.CompositeManager.start(CompositeManager.java:355)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.CompositeFactory.createInstance(CompositeFactory.java:147)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.IPojoFactory.createComponentInstance(IPojoFactory.java:301)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.__createInstance(InstanceHandler.java:160)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.createInstance(InstanceHandler.java)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.__bindFactory(InstanceHandler.java:184)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.instance.InstanceHandler.bindFactory(InstanceHandler.java)
> 	at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2.invoke(Unknown Source)
> 	at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> 	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> 	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.util.Callback.call(Callback.java:260)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyCallback.callOnInstance(DependencyCallback.java:309)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.Dependency.invokeCallback(Dependency.java:315)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.Dependency.onObjectCreation(Dependency.java:280)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyHandler.__onCreation(DependencyHandler.java:643)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.handlers.dependency.DependencyHandler.onCreation(DependencyHandler.java)
> 	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.HandlerManager.start(HandlerManager.java:132)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.CompositeManager.start(CompositeManager.java:355)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite.CompositeFactory.createInstance(CompositeFactory.java:147)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.IPojoFactory.createComponentInstance(IPojoFactory.java:301)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.IPojoFactory.createComponentInstance(IPojoFactory.java:238)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.InstanceCreator$ManagedInstance.create(InstanceCreator.java:343)
> 	at
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.InstanceCreator.addInstance(InstanceCreator.java:89)
> 	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.Extender.parse(Extender.java:306)
> 	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.Extender.startManagementFor(Extender.java:237)
> 	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.Extender.access$600(Extender.java:52)
> 	at org.apache.felix.ipojo.Extender$CreatorThread.run(Extender.java:769)
> 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)
> 
> Apparently it is mixing the instances with other names... pretty weird...
> :-/
> 
> I'm using the following bundles, all downloaded and compiled today:
> 
> START LEVEL 1
>   ID   State         Level  Name
> [   0] [Active     ] [    0] System Bundle (4.0.2)
> [   1] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix Bundle Repository (1.6.6)
> [   2] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix iPOJO (1.9.0.SNAPSHOT)
> [   3] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix iPOJO API (1.7.0.SNAPSHOT)
> [   4] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix iPOJO Arch Command
> (1.7.0.SNAPSHOT)
> [   5] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix iPOJO Composite (1.9.0.SNAPSHOT)
> [   6] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix Shell Service (1.4.2)
> [   7] [Active     ] [    1] Apache Felix Shell TUI (1.4.1)
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Fabio
> 
> P.S.: When I start this composite bundle, I receive a warning about the
> instance "name" attribute that was deprecated. It tells me to use
> "instance.name". However, the "instance.name" seems not to be working,
> because, when I use it, the instance do not receive the name I desire. So I
> kept using the "name", who is working, even knowing it was deprecated.
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Cannot-name-an-instance-of-a-composite-inside-another-composite-using-1.9.0-snapshot-tp33653319p33653319.html
> Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org