You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pulsar.apache.org by zhaocong <zh...@apache.org> on 2022/05/26 13:40:30 UTC

[VOTE] PIP-168: Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on Proxy

Hi Pulsar Community,


I would like to start a VOTE on "Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on Proxy"
(PIP-168).


The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15631

and the discussion thead is available at

https://lists.apache.org/thread/gjys9tvbd5hy28mbkbcq7wkqfldycn7v


Voting will stay open for at least 48h.


Thanks,

Cong Zhao

Re: [VOTE] PIP-168: Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on Proxy

Posted by Cong Zhao <zh...@apache.org>.
I forgot to close this vote.

I'm closing the vote.
The proposal has been accepted with 4 binding +1, non-binding +1 votes.

Thanks,
Cong Zhao

On 2022/05/26 13:40:30 zhaocong wrote:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
> 
> 
> I would like to start a VOTE on "Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on Proxy"
> (PIP-168).
> 
> 
> The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15631
> 
> and the discussion thead is available at
> 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/gjys9tvbd5hy28mbkbcq7wkqfldycn7v
> 
> 
> Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Cong Zhao
> 

Re: [VOTE] PIP-168: Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on Proxy

Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)

Il giorno mar 31 mag 2022 alle ore 09:58 Cong Zhao
<zh...@apache.org> ha scritto:
>
> ok, I have added the new configuration to the proposal.
>
> On 2022/05/31 05:14:13 PengHui Li wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Could you please also add the new configuration to the proposal?
> > I see you added in the PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15678/files
> > but not present in the proposal
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Penghui
> >
> > On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:40 PM zhaocong <zh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Pulsar Community,
> > >
> > >
> > > I would like to start a VOTE on "Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on Proxy"
> > > (PIP-168).
> > >
> > >
> > > The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15631
> > >
> > > and the discussion thead is available at
> > >
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/gjys9tvbd5hy28mbkbcq7wkqfldycn7v
> > >
> > >
> > > Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Cong Zhao
> > >
> >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-168: Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on Proxy

Posted by Cong Zhao <zh...@apache.org>.
ok, I have added the new configuration to the proposal.

On 2022/05/31 05:14:13 PengHui Li wrote:
> +1
> 
> Could you please also add the new configuration to the proposal?
> I see you added in the PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15678/files
> but not present in the proposal
> 
> Thanks,
> Penghui
> 
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:40 PM zhaocong <zh...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Pulsar Community,
> >
> >
> > I would like to start a VOTE on "Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on Proxy"
> > (PIP-168).
> >
> >
> > The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15631
> >
> > and the discussion thead is available at
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/gjys9tvbd5hy28mbkbcq7wkqfldycn7v
> >
> >
> > Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Cong Zhao
> >
> 

Re: [VOTE] PIP-168: Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on Proxy

Posted by PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>.
+1

Could you please also add the new configuration to the proposal?
I see you added in the PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15678/files
but not present in the proposal

Thanks,
Penghui

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:40 PM zhaocong <zh...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
>
> I would like to start a VOTE on "Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on Proxy"
> (PIP-168).
>
>
> The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15631
>
> and the discussion thead is available at
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/gjys9tvbd5hy28mbkbcq7wkqfldycn7v
>
>
> Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Cong Zhao
>

Re: [VOTE] PIP-168: Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on Proxy

Posted by Hang Chen <ch...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)

Thanks,
Hang

Neng Lu <fr...@gmail.com> 于2022年6月1日周三 05:44写道:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 6:21 AM Haiting Jiang <ji...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Haiting
> >
> > On 2022/05/26 13:40:30 zhaocong wrote:
> > > Hi Pulsar Community,
> > >
> > >
> > > I would like to start a VOTE on "Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on
> > Proxy"
> > > (PIP-168).
> > >
> > >
> > > The proposal can be read at
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15631
> > >
> > > and the discussion thead is available at
> > >
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/gjys9tvbd5hy28mbkbcq7wkqfldycn7v
> > >
> > >
> > > Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Cong Zhao
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Neng

Re: [VOTE] PIP-168: Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on Proxy

Posted by Neng Lu <fr...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 6:21 AM Haiting Jiang <ji...@apache.org>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Haiting
>
> On 2022/05/26 13:40:30 zhaocong wrote:
> > Hi Pulsar Community,
> >
> >
> > I would like to start a VOTE on "Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on
> Proxy"
> > (PIP-168).
> >
> >
> > The proposal can be read at
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15631
> >
> > and the discussion thead is available at
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/gjys9tvbd5hy28mbkbcq7wkqfldycn7v
> >
> >
> > Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Cong Zhao
> >
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Neng

Re: [VOTE] PIP-168: Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on Proxy

Posted by Haiting Jiang <ji...@apache.org>.
+1

Thanks,
Haiting

On 2022/05/26 13:40:30 zhaocong wrote:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
> 
> 
> I would like to start a VOTE on "Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on Proxy"
> (PIP-168).
> 
> 
> The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15631
> 
> and the discussion thead is available at
> 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/gjys9tvbd5hy28mbkbcq7wkqfldycn7v
> 
> 
> Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Cong Zhao
>