You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@lucene.apache.org by "Munendra S N (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/12/05 06:58:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10732) potential optimizations in callers of
SolrIndexSearcher.numDocs when docset is empty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Munendra S N updated SOLR-10732:
--------------------------------
Attachment: SOLR-10732.patch
> potential optimizations in callers of SolrIndexSearcher.numDocs when docset is empty
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10732
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10732
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Chris M. Hostetter
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-10732.patch
>
>
> spin off of SOLR-10727...
> {quote}
> ...why not (also) optimize it slightly higher up and completely avoid the construction of the Query objects? (and in some cases: additional overhead)
> for example: the first usage of {{SolrIndexSearcher.numDocs(Query,DocSet)}} i found was {{RangeFacetProcessor.rangeCount(DocSet subset,...)}} ... if the first line of that method was {{if (0 == subset.size()) return 0}} then we'd not only optimize away the SolrIndexSearcher hit, but also fetching the SchemaField & building the range query (not to mention the much more expensive {{getGroupedFacetQueryCount}} in the grouping case)
> At a glance, most other callers of {{SolrIndexSearcher.numDocs(Query,DocSet)}} could be trivially optimize this way as well -- at a minimum to eliminate Query parsing/construction.
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org