You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de> on 2011/07/03 19:56:08 UTC
Re: Final WC format bump before branch
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:01:44AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> We're almost ready to branch 1.7.x, and there remains the business of
> cleaning up the database schema from columns introduced in the 1.7
> development cycle. This has historically be labelled 'format 99', and
> is found at the bottom of wc-metadata.sql.
>
> It feels that the current schema is stable, so I'd like to propose
> that we make format 99 format 30, and release with the wc format as
> format 30. Users running development builds will have an automatic
> upgrade (as with recent wc format bumps).
>
> Concerns?
I think we should rename the "absent" presence value to "server-excluded"
before release. We've already done that in the code, but the storage is
still using the old name.
Re: Final WC format bump before branch
Posted by Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de>.
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:22:55AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de> wrote:
> > I think we should rename the "absent" presence value to "server-excluded"
> > before release. We've already done that in the code, but the storage is
> > still using the old name.
>
> Put a note somewhere in the format 99 area, and I'll make sure it happens.
Cheers! r1142695
Re: Final WC format bump before branch
Posted by Hyrum K Wright <hy...@hyrumwright.org>.
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:01:44AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> We're almost ready to branch 1.7.x, and there remains the business of
>> cleaning up the database schema from columns introduced in the 1.7
>> development cycle. This has historically be labelled 'format 99', and
>> is found at the bottom of wc-metadata.sql.
>>
>> It feels that the current schema is stable, so I'd like to propose
>> that we make format 99 format 30, and release with the wc format as
>> format 30. Users running development builds will have an automatic
>> upgrade (as with recent wc format bumps).
>>
>> Concerns?
>
> I think we should rename the "absent" presence value to "server-excluded"
> before release. We've already done that in the code, but the storage is
> still using the old name.
Put a note somewhere in the format 99 area, and I'll make sure it happens.
-Hyrum