You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by James Cowan <ja...@googlemail.com> on 2012/03/09 17:08:52 UTC
Maven and Flex 4.6
Hi
what is the situation with maven and flex 4.6?
I posted this message on the Adobe forum and got directed here:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/4246042#4246042
As far as I can tell, Flex SDK 4.6 is now installed in the Sonatype repo
here:
https://repository.sonatype.org/content/groups/flexgroup/com/adobe/flex/framework/playerglobal/4.6.b.23201/
The flexmojos plugin is wired to use SDK 4.5.1.21328, but it does work
with 4.6.0.23201B if you change a few of the poms
and recompile.
James
Re: Maven and Flex 4.6
Posted by Conrad Winchester <co...@chiwestern.com>.
Here's how to create a mavenised flex sdk
https://github.com/piercer/flex_sdk_maven_install
On 9 Mar 2012, at 18:04, James Cowan wrote:
>
> You will see in the reply on the Adobe forum that Adobe have no plans for maven and see it as Apache's beef.
>
> Introducing native maven support (or ant *with* ivy) into Flex would be great but things have been limbo for ages and there are lots
> of improvements between 4.5 (current flexmojos target) and 4.6, not least in the mobile stuff.
>
> The practical steps of getting 4.6 working with flexmojos are almost there; someone has been through the pain of getting the SDK
> uploaded into a Sonatype repo and flexmojos can be recompiled to support it.
>
> Can Apache Flex not invite Marvin Froeder (the Flex mojos author) to join Apache?
>
> Is flexmojos license the issue? Can JP Morgan lob some funding over to Marvin Froeder :-)
>
> James
>
> On 09/03/2012 17:56, Skogen, Espen wrote:
>> 4.6 is the adobe release, so that's sort of Adobe's beef. We are looking at introducing native Maven support for Apache Flex in a future release, but there's no timeline at this stage.
>>
>> E:)
>>
>>
>> Espen Skogen | Vice President | IB Tech Market | Investment Bank | J.P. Morgan | 125 London Wall, EC2Y 5AJ, London, United Kingdom | T: +442077420836 | espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com | jpmorgan.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: James Cowan [mailto:jamesmcowan@googlemail.com]
>> Sent: 09 March 2012 16:09
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Maven and Flex 4.6
>>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> what is the situation with maven and flex 4.6?
>>
>> I posted this message on the Adobe forum and got directed here:
>>
>> http://forums.adobe.com/message/4246042#4246042
>>
>> As far as I can tell, Flex SDK 4.6 is now installed in the Sonatype repo
>> here:
>>
>> https://repository.sonatype.org/content/groups/flexgroup/com/adobe/flex/framework/playerglobal/4.6.b.23201/
>>
>> The flexmojos plugin is wired to use SDK 4.5.1.21328, but it does work with 4.6.0.23201B if you change a few of the poms and recompile.
>>
>> James
>>
>> This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
>> conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
>> securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
>> confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
>> available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
>>
>
RE: Maven and Flex 4.6
Posted by "Skogen, Espen" <es...@jpmorgan.com>.
Sure, but Flexmojos does a perfectly fine job at building Flex in a Maven environment. I suppose if Marvin decided to abandon it, then there would be an argument for bringing it into the fold, but I don't see a reason to reinvent the wheel. Just use Flexmojos if you want to use Maven - That's certainly what I'm doing:)
E:)
Espen Skogen | Vice President | IB Tech Market | Investment Bank | J.P. Morgan | 125 London Wall, EC2Y 5AJ, London, United Kingdom | T: +442077420836 | espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com | jpmorgan.com
-----Original Message-----
From: James Cowan [mailto:jamesmcowan@googlemail.com]
Sent: 09 March 2012 20:01
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Maven and Flex 4.6
HI Espen
there are 2 issues.
Compiling the SDK with maven will make the pain and suffering of getting it into a maven repo go away and what you are doing will fix that.
Compiling Flex sources in a maven build environment is the big issue and if flexmojos is not brought into the fold, there is a ton of development needed (or back to ant).
James
On 09/03/2012 19:42, Skogen, Espen wrote:
> James,
>
> What I was trying to say was that the Apache project will address improvements to Apache releases, not Adobe's. So in short, Apache has no plans to look at Adobe Flex 4.6, because we have no stake at all in Adobe Flex.
>
> But I am certainly looking at getting the first Apache release prepared for Maven, so if all goes well...
>
> E:)
>
>
> Espen Skogen | Vice President | IB Tech Market | Investment Bank |
> J.P. Morgan | 125 London Wall, EC2Y 5AJ, London, United Kingdom | T:
> +442077420836 | espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com | jpmorgan.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Cowan [mailto:jamesmcowan@googlemail.com]
> Sent: 09 March 2012 18:05
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Maven and Flex 4.6
>
>
> You will see in the reply on the Adobe forum that Adobe have no plans for maven and see it as Apache's beef.
>
> Introducing native maven support (or ant *with* ivy) into Flex would be great but things have been limbo for ages and there are lots of improvements between 4.5 (current flexmojos target) and 4.6, not least in the mobile stuff.
>
> The practical steps of getting 4.6 working with flexmojos are almost there; someone has been through the pain of getting the SDK uploaded into a Sonatype repo and flexmojos can be recompiled to support it.
>
> Can Apache Flex not invite Marvin Froeder (the Flex mojos author) to join Apache?
>
> Is flexmojos license the issue? Can JP Morgan lob some funding over to
> Marvin Froeder :-)
>
> James
>
> On 09/03/2012 17:56, Skogen, Espen wrote:
>> 4.6 is the adobe release, so that's sort of Adobe's beef. We are looking at introducing native Maven support for Apache Flex in a future release, but there's no timeline at this stage.
>>
>> E:)
>>
>>
>> Espen Skogen | Vice President | IB Tech Market | Investment Bank |
>> J.P. Morgan | 125 London Wall, EC2Y 5AJ, London, United Kingdom | T:
>> +442077420836 | espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com | jpmorgan.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: James Cowan [mailto:jamesmcowan@googlemail.com]
>> Sent: 09 March 2012 16:09
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Maven and Flex 4.6
>>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> what is the situation with maven and flex 4.6?
>>
>> I posted this message on the Adobe forum and got directed here:
>>
>> http://forums.adobe.com/message/4246042#4246042
>>
>> As far as I can tell, Flex SDK 4.6 is now installed in the Sonatype
>> repo
>> here:
>>
>> https://repository.sonatype.org/content/groups/flexgroup/com/adobe/fl
>> e x/framework/playerglobal/4.6.b.23201/
>>
>> The flexmojos plugin is wired to use SDK 4.5.1.21328, but it does work with 4.6.0.23201B if you change a few of the poms and recompile.
>>
>> James
>>
>> This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
>> conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
>> securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
>> confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
>> available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
>>
>
This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
Re: Maven and Flex 4.6
Posted by James Cowan <ja...@googlemail.com>.
HI Espen
there are 2 issues.
Compiling the SDK with maven will make the pain and suffering of getting
it into a maven repo go away and what you are doing will fix that.
Compiling Flex sources in a maven build environment is the big issue and
if flexmojos is not brought into the fold, there is a ton of development
needed (or back to ant).
James
On 09/03/2012 19:42, Skogen, Espen wrote:
> James,
>
> What I was trying to say was that the Apache project will address improvements to Apache releases, not Adobe's. So in short, Apache has no plans to look at Adobe Flex 4.6, because we have no stake at all in Adobe Flex.
>
> But I am certainly looking at getting the first Apache release prepared for Maven, so if all goes well...
>
> E:)
>
>
> Espen Skogen | Vice President | IB Tech Market | Investment Bank | J.P. Morgan | 125 London Wall, EC2Y 5AJ, London, United Kingdom | T: +442077420836 | espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com | jpmorgan.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Cowan [mailto:jamesmcowan@googlemail.com]
> Sent: 09 March 2012 18:05
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Maven and Flex 4.6
>
>
> You will see in the reply on the Adobe forum that Adobe have no plans for maven and see it as Apache's beef.
>
> Introducing native maven support (or ant *with* ivy) into Flex would be great but things have been limbo for ages and there are lots of improvements between 4.5 (current flexmojos target) and 4.6, not least in the mobile stuff.
>
> The practical steps of getting 4.6 working with flexmojos are almost there; someone has been through the pain of getting the SDK uploaded into a Sonatype repo and flexmojos can be recompiled to support it.
>
> Can Apache Flex not invite Marvin Froeder (the Flex mojos author) to join Apache?
>
> Is flexmojos license the issue? Can JP Morgan lob some funding over to Marvin Froeder :-)
>
> James
>
> On 09/03/2012 17:56, Skogen, Espen wrote:
>> 4.6 is the adobe release, so that's sort of Adobe's beef. We are looking at introducing native Maven support for Apache Flex in a future release, but there's no timeline at this stage.
>>
>> E:)
>>
>>
>> Espen Skogen | Vice President | IB Tech Market | Investment Bank |
>> J.P. Morgan | 125 London Wall, EC2Y 5AJ, London, United Kingdom | T:
>> +442077420836 | espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com | jpmorgan.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: James Cowan [mailto:jamesmcowan@googlemail.com]
>> Sent: 09 March 2012 16:09
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Maven and Flex 4.6
>>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> what is the situation with maven and flex 4.6?
>>
>> I posted this message on the Adobe forum and got directed here:
>>
>> http://forums.adobe.com/message/4246042#4246042
>>
>> As far as I can tell, Flex SDK 4.6 is now installed in the Sonatype
>> repo
>> here:
>>
>> https://repository.sonatype.org/content/groups/flexgroup/com/adobe/fle
>> x/framework/playerglobal/4.6.b.23201/
>>
>> The flexmojos plugin is wired to use SDK 4.5.1.21328, but it does work with 4.6.0.23201B if you change a few of the poms and recompile.
>>
>> James
>>
>> This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
>> conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of securities,
>> accuracy and completeness of information, viruses, confidentiality,
>> legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers, available at
>> http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
>>
>
RE: Maven and Flex 4.6
Posted by "Skogen, Espen" <es...@jpmorgan.com>.
James,
What I was trying to say was that the Apache project will address improvements to Apache releases, not Adobe's. So in short, Apache has no plans to look at Adobe Flex 4.6, because we have no stake at all in Adobe Flex.
But I am certainly looking at getting the first Apache release prepared for Maven, so if all goes well...
E:)
Espen Skogen | Vice President | IB Tech Market | Investment Bank | J.P. Morgan | 125 London Wall, EC2Y 5AJ, London, United Kingdom | T: +442077420836 | espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com | jpmorgan.com
-----Original Message-----
From: James Cowan [mailto:jamesmcowan@googlemail.com]
Sent: 09 March 2012 18:05
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Maven and Flex 4.6
You will see in the reply on the Adobe forum that Adobe have no plans for maven and see it as Apache's beef.
Introducing native maven support (or ant *with* ivy) into Flex would be great but things have been limbo for ages and there are lots of improvements between 4.5 (current flexmojos target) and 4.6, not least in the mobile stuff.
The practical steps of getting 4.6 working with flexmojos are almost there; someone has been through the pain of getting the SDK uploaded into a Sonatype repo and flexmojos can be recompiled to support it.
Can Apache Flex not invite Marvin Froeder (the Flex mojos author) to join Apache?
Is flexmojos license the issue? Can JP Morgan lob some funding over to Marvin Froeder :-)
James
On 09/03/2012 17:56, Skogen, Espen wrote:
> 4.6 is the adobe release, so that's sort of Adobe's beef. We are looking at introducing native Maven support for Apache Flex in a future release, but there's no timeline at this stage.
>
> E:)
>
>
> Espen Skogen | Vice President | IB Tech Market | Investment Bank |
> J.P. Morgan | 125 London Wall, EC2Y 5AJ, London, United Kingdom | T:
> +442077420836 | espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com | jpmorgan.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Cowan [mailto:jamesmcowan@googlemail.com]
> Sent: 09 March 2012 16:09
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Maven and Flex 4.6
>
>
> Hi
>
> what is the situation with maven and flex 4.6?
>
> I posted this message on the Adobe forum and got directed here:
>
> http://forums.adobe.com/message/4246042#4246042
>
> As far as I can tell, Flex SDK 4.6 is now installed in the Sonatype
> repo
> here:
>
> https://repository.sonatype.org/content/groups/flexgroup/com/adobe/fle
> x/framework/playerglobal/4.6.b.23201/
>
> The flexmojos plugin is wired to use SDK 4.5.1.21328, but it does work with 4.6.0.23201B if you change a few of the poms and recompile.
>
> James
>
> This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
> conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of securities,
> accuracy and completeness of information, viruses, confidentiality,
> legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers, available at
> http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
>
Re: Maven and Flex 4.6
Posted by Keith Sutton <ke...@spoon.as>.
I my last months at Adobe I worked with Marvin and the Flex release
engineers on releasing a 'maven-ized' SDK release, at the time (Nov) it
was really close to being done. Not sure what the ultimate fate of that
was. There were plans to do this and improve Maven integration in Flash
Builder which Marvin was collaborating on but that has gone by the
wayside given events.
Marvin has been struggling on a number of fronts for years, 1) is trying
to develop a business around one of the most downloaded open source Flex
projects (which he was beginning to get off the ground up to November),
and 2) getting people to contribute code and not just complaints into
flexmojos.
I have been in touch with Marvin since November and he is interested in
continuing to some degree but just can't do it on his own. Given the
events since Nov it is not surprising he would reconsider his future
however given the value provided by flexmojos to so many
people/organizations it would be a shame not to see it continue forward.
On 3/9/2012 12:08 PM, Martin Heidegger wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 04:47, Greg Reddin wrote:
>> Do we know that or has that discussion occurred?
> There has been lengthy (public) discussions about Maven on Flex and
> maven in Flex. I guess if the developers wanted to they would offer it
> here?!
> Am I in the wrong impression here?
>
> On 10/03/2012 04:56, James Cowan wrote:
>> The license is GPL on the flexmojos site.
>
> ?? It states big and in all class files that its APL[1] where do you
> read GPL?
>
>> I have always found Marvin extremely helpful. Also the source code of
>> flexmojos is enormous (enough to make your eyes water) and it took me
>> a day and
>> some ghastly hacks to get it to coexist imperfectly with SDK 4.6 so
>> getting Marvin involved somehow would be very good.
>
> Apache is all about self-interest. If Marvin wants to help he can do so.
>
> On 10/03/2012 05:04, Skogen, Espen wrote:
>> Sure, but Flexmojos does a perfectly fine job at building Flex in a
>> Maven environment. I suppose if Marvin decided to abandon it, then
>> there would be an argument for bringing it into the fold, but I don't
>> see a reason to reinvent the wheel. Just use Flexmojos if you want to
>> use Maven - That's certainly what I'm doing:)
> I am not sure why to call it abandoned? The last commit was 8 days
> ago[2] That is okay for a small project.
>
> yours
> Martin.
>
>
> [1] http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/license.html
> [2] https://github.com/Flexmojos/flexmojos/commits/flexmojos-4.x
Re: Maven and Flex 4.6
Posted by Martin Heidegger <mh...@leichtgewicht.at>.
On 10/03/2012 04:47, Greg Reddin wrote:
> Do we know that or has that discussion occurred?
There has been lengthy (public) discussions about Maven on Flex and
maven in Flex. I guess if the developers wanted to they would offer it
here?!
Am I in the wrong impression here?
On 10/03/2012 04:56, James Cowan wrote:
> The license is GPL on the flexmojos site.
?? It states big and in all class files that its APL[1] where do you
read GPL?
> I have always found Marvin extremely helpful. Also the source code of
> flexmojos is enormous (enough to make your eyes water) and it took me
> a day and
> some ghastly hacks to get it to coexist imperfectly with SDK 4.6 so
> getting Marvin involved somehow would be very good.
Apache is all about self-interest. If Marvin wants to help he can do so.
On 10/03/2012 05:04, Skogen, Espen wrote:
> Sure, but Flexmojos does a perfectly fine job at building Flex in a Maven environment. I suppose if Marvin decided to abandon it, then there would be an argument for bringing it into the fold, but I don't see a reason to reinvent the wheel. Just use Flexmojos if you want to use Maven - That's certainly what I'm doing:)
I am not sure why to call it abandoned? The last commit was 8 days
ago[2] That is okay for a small project.
yours
Martin.
[1] http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/license.html
[2] https://github.com/Flexmojos/flexmojos/commits/flexmojos-4.x
Re: Maven and Flex 4.6
Posted by Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Martin Heidegger <mh...@leichtgewicht.at> wrote:
> I think the issue is that Marvin Froeder is not interested in contribution
> the mojos to flex.
Do we know that or has that discussion occurred?
> @Mentor: What are the rules to branching other Open source projects to
> Apache Projects?
We don't like to fork a project if the current project community is
unwilling. I suppose we have a legal right to do it, but we prefer to
respect the wishes of the other community.
Greg
Re: Maven and Flex 4.6
Posted by Martin Heidegger <mh...@leichtgewicht.at>.
On 10/03/2012 04:38, Martin Heidegger wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 03:04, James Cowan wrote:
>> Can Apache Flex not invite Marvin Froeder (the Flex mojos author) to
>> join Apache?
>>
>> Is flexmojos license the issue? Can JP Morgan lob some funding over
>> to Marvin Froeder :-)
>>
>> James
> I think the issue is that Marvin Froeder is not interested in
> contribution the mojos to flex.
>
> However: Generally speaking: The Flex mojos are licensed under APL 2.0
> this means that any
> contributor could theoretically fork the mojos and add it to the flex
> sdk. Opensource and stuff.
>
> @Mentor: What are the rules to branching other Open source projects to
> Apache Projects?
>
> yours
> Martin.
And then on another thought: the development of FlexMojos is open at
github. Anyone interested
can already commit there ... there would be no value to host it on Apache ?!
yours
Martin.
Re: Maven and Flex 4.6
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 3/9/12 11:56 AM, "James Cowan" <ja...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> The license is GPL on the flexmojos site.
>
That will probably make things even more difficult.
The basic state of the world is that Adobe is not going to provide Maven
support for Adobe versions of Flex.
Apache Flex is supposed to create a release of Flex that is compatible with
Adobe Flex 4.6 and then make improvements from there. Lots of folks in
Apache Flex are planning to make the Apache Flex releases work with Maven.
I'm still hoping the 4.6 parity release will happen in the March although I
imagine the Maven work will take much longer.
Whether we somehow get FlexMojos donated to Apache (which I doubt) or create
or own integration from scratch, the goal is to figure out what it takes to
make Apache Flex releases work with Maven. Should it really be a lot of
code to make it work?
There doesn't seem to be enough folks who want to use Maven to build the
Flex SDK so I don't see that happening. Ant will be the official way to
build the SDK in the near future.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: Maven and Flex 4.6
Posted by James Cowan <ja...@googlemail.com>.
On 09/03/2012 19:38, Martin Heidegger wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 03:04, James Cowan wrote:
>> Can Apache Flex not invite Marvin Froeder (the Flex mojos author) to
>> join Apache?
>>
>> Is flexmojos license the issue? Can JP Morgan lob some funding over
>> to Marvin Froeder :-)
>>
>> James
> I think the issue is that Marvin Froeder is not interested in
> contribution the mojos to flex.
>
> However: Generally speaking: The Flex mojos are licensed under APL 2.0
> this means that any
> contributor could theoretically fork the mojos and add it to the flex
> sdk. Opensource and stuff.
>
> @Mentor: What are the rules to branching other Open source projects to
> Apache Projects?
>
> yours
> Martin.
>
The license is GPL on the flexmojos site.
I imagine that is because Marvin has worked on it for many years and
never been funded - I know he is working on a licensed
version FME (for mobiles) - making a living as an open source developer
is very tough unless you are funded.
I have always found Marvin extremely helpful. Also the source code of
flexmojos is enormous (enough to make your eyes water) and it took me a
day and
some ghastly hacks to get it to coexist imperfectly with SDK 4.6 so
getting Marvin involved somehow would be very good.
James
Re: Maven and Flex 4.6
Posted by Martin Heidegger <mh...@leichtgewicht.at>.
On 10/03/2012 03:04, James Cowan wrote:
> Can Apache Flex not invite Marvin Froeder (the Flex mojos author) to
> join Apache?
>
> Is flexmojos license the issue? Can JP Morgan lob some funding over to
> Marvin Froeder :-)
>
> James
I think the issue is that Marvin Froeder is not interested in
contribution the mojos to flex.
However: Generally speaking: The Flex mojos are licensed under APL 2.0
this means that any
contributor could theoretically fork the mojos and add it to the flex
sdk. Opensource and stuff.
@Mentor: What are the rules to branching other Open source projects to
Apache Projects?
yours
Martin.
Re: Maven and Flex 4.6
Posted by James Cowan <ja...@googlemail.com>.
You will see in the reply on the Adobe forum that Adobe have no plans
for maven and see it as Apache's beef.
Introducing native maven support (or ant *with* ivy) into Flex would be
great but things have been limbo for ages and there are lots
of improvements between 4.5 (current flexmojos target) and 4.6, not
least in the mobile stuff.
The practical steps of getting 4.6 working with flexmojos are almost
there; someone has been through the pain of getting the SDK
uploaded into a Sonatype repo and flexmojos can be recompiled to support it.
Can Apache Flex not invite Marvin Froeder (the Flex mojos author) to
join Apache?
Is flexmojos license the issue? Can JP Morgan lob some funding over to
Marvin Froeder :-)
James
On 09/03/2012 17:56, Skogen, Espen wrote:
> 4.6 is the adobe release, so that's sort of Adobe's beef. We are looking at introducing native Maven support for Apache Flex in a future release, but there's no timeline at this stage.
>
> E:)
>
>
> Espen Skogen | Vice President | IB Tech Market | Investment Bank | J.P. Morgan | 125 London Wall, EC2Y 5AJ, London, United Kingdom | T: +442077420836 | espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com | jpmorgan.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Cowan [mailto:jamesmcowan@googlemail.com]
> Sent: 09 March 2012 16:09
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Maven and Flex 4.6
>
>
> Hi
>
> what is the situation with maven and flex 4.6?
>
> I posted this message on the Adobe forum and got directed here:
>
> http://forums.adobe.com/message/4246042#4246042
>
> As far as I can tell, Flex SDK 4.6 is now installed in the Sonatype repo
> here:
>
> https://repository.sonatype.org/content/groups/flexgroup/com/adobe/flex/framework/playerglobal/4.6.b.23201/
>
> The flexmojos plugin is wired to use SDK 4.5.1.21328, but it does work with 4.6.0.23201B if you change a few of the poms and recompile.
>
> James
>
> This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
> conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
> securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
> confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
> available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
>
RE: Maven and Flex 4.6
Posted by "Skogen, Espen" <es...@jpmorgan.com>.
4.6 is the adobe release, so that's sort of Adobe's beef. We are looking at introducing native Maven support for Apache Flex in a future release, but there's no timeline at this stage.
E:)
Espen Skogen | Vice President | IB Tech Market | Investment Bank | J.P. Morgan | 125 London Wall, EC2Y 5AJ, London, United Kingdom | T: +442077420836 | espen.skogen@jpmorgan.com | jpmorgan.com
-----Original Message-----
From: James Cowan [mailto:jamesmcowan@googlemail.com]
Sent: 09 March 2012 16:09
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Maven and Flex 4.6
Hi
what is the situation with maven and flex 4.6?
I posted this message on the Adobe forum and got directed here:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/4246042#4246042
As far as I can tell, Flex SDK 4.6 is now installed in the Sonatype repo
here:
https://repository.sonatype.org/content/groups/flexgroup/com/adobe/flex/framework/playerglobal/4.6.b.23201/
The flexmojos plugin is wired to use SDK 4.5.1.21328, but it does work with 4.6.0.23201B if you change a few of the poms and recompile.
James
This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.