You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ranger.apache.org by "Velmurugan Periasamy (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/03/08 10:26:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (RANGER-1326) Fix remaining licensing
issues
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16391031#comment-16391031 ]
Velmurugan Periasamy edited comment on RANGER-1326 at 3/8/18 10:25 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[~coheigea] - Agreed. Updated the fix version.
There are conflicting suggestions for item 3 (where Font Awesome and json2.js dependency gets documented - either LICENSE or NOTICE). I think we can go with Justin's suggestion and remove Font Awesome from NOTICE (json2.js is already removed). See attached patch.
Other items are already resolved.
was (Author: vperiasamy):
[~coheigea] - Agreed. Updated the fix version.
There are conflicting suggestions for item 3 (where Font Awesome and json2.js dependency gets documented - either LICENSE or NOTICE). I think we can go with Justin's suggestion and remove Font Awesome from NOTICE. See attached patch.
Other items are already resolved.
> Fix remaining licensing issues
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: RANGER-1326
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1326
> Project: Ranger
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.6.2
> Reporter: Colm O hEigeartaigh
> Assignee: Velmurugan Periasamy
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
> Attachments: 0001-RANGER-1326-Removed-dependency-from-NOTICE-as-it-is-.patch
>
>
> We need to fix the remaining licensing issues as raised by Jusin:
> For items not fixed please see [1][2][3].
> Also note that with json2.js license it seems a little unclear to me and may be under the JSON license. It does have “public domain” in the code so it may be OK, it still however needs to be added to LICENSE. Just be careful as the JSON license no longer allowed in Apache software and it is considered category X. [4] In this case you do have a few months grace to remove this [5] but you need to call it out in NOTICE and it still needs to be removed by end of April. [5]
> 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6949e2f048b07478c861a675ad8e98d750e0f786b272a6afc69df78e@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> 2. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9552c63b71a38ed75cd252463e788408aa4a9a05abeba36168df5a12@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> 3. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de169a09f7527fbc3549518f0227ba40ee8524c6e60ba8105d82479b@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> 4. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-x
> 5. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bb18f942ce7eb83c11438303c818b885810fb76385979490366720d5@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)