Re: proposal: 3.1.0-pre3 and rescore update

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


+1.

(btw I don't know if we should accept pre2 mass-checks -- but either
way we can tell from the comments at the top of the *.log files.)

- --j.

Daniel Quinlan writes:
> First, please review:
> 
>   http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?idD50
> 
> I propose that:
> 
>   1. We release pre3 and encourage people to mass-check with it (and
>      extend mass-checks).  mass-checks will be faster with URIBL reuse
>      anyway (SPF can be reused, but the check still has to be done since
>      the NEUTRAL rules are new).
> 
>   2. I'll send an updated announcement saying as much.  I also want to
>      take the chance to tweak the directions a tiny bit.
> 
>   3. We extend the mass-check period by the amount of time lost (rounded
>      up to the nearest day and overlapping another weekend).  Lots of
>      time.
> 
>   4. We will accept pre2 mass-checks, but prefer pre3 mass-checks.
> 
> Daniel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFCxen+MJF5cimLx9ARAprhAJ4yP4EXExR9JXc1jIVRBsitKGoOAgCfSJEN
LIOXIUP0IrMHoj1rQ7pEUOI=
=KJk6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: proposal: 3.1.0-pre3 and rescore update

[Duncan Findlay <du...@debian.org>]

On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 06:12:30PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> +1.

+1 on pre3

Duncan