You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by Thilina Gunarathne <cs...@gmail.com> on 2005/03/15 11:54:15 UTC
[Axis2] MTOM Patch
Hi,
Please apply the patch to scratch/thilina/mtom folder.
Thanks,
Thilina.
RE: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
Posted by Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk>.
Hi all,
See my comments below.
>
> Hi all,
> I am definitley +1 for having Thilina as a commiter. He has done good
> code and I have no doubt that he is the guy to MTOMize OM.
> However I am still 0- on integrating the code to the main stream
> *right now*. I've looked at Thilinas MTOM architecture and in my view
> it is the most reasonable MTOM implementation we can do on OM.But I
> strongly think we should wait till the F2F to discuss MTOM in bit more
> detail and then do it.
I agree with you that we need more things to be clarified in the next f2f.
But as I have worked with Thilina, I know how difficult for him to work in
the scratch area. He has to get a separate build from the main tree, put
that in to his scratch and do changes and ...... So its reasonable from his
side to put that in the main src area.
Plus, as we do, we can always scrap whatever we do and start over again. But
putting MTOM stuff in to the main tree will not hinder that. You can always
do changes, and do whatever there too. Even Axis 2 it self is in that state.
And MTOM stuff Thilina has done is mature enough to go in to the main src
area.
So I propose, we should put that in the main src area, as Dims has also
proposed. (At least that will make Thilina's life easier).
Shall We ??
Thilina, better if you can create wiki on MTOM and put whatever
documentation there.
Regards,
Chinthaka
Since MTOM is a major turn, my guess is we
> should do this patiently, rather than in a hurry.
>
>
>
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:21:56 +0600, Eran Chinthaka
> <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > Well, I went through MTOM architecture a bit. For me the architecture is
> > good and it integrates with OM smoothly.
> >
> > So I'd like to integrate MTOM in to the main area.
> >
> > And this is my +1 for Sanjiva's idea to propose Thilina as a committer.
> >
> > -- Chinthaka
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ajith Ranabahu
Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
Posted by Ajith Ranabahu <aj...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
I am definitley +1 for having Thilina as a commiter. He has done good
code and I have no doubt that he is the guy to MTOMize OM.
However I am still 0- on integrating the code to the main stream
*right now*. I've looked at Thilinas MTOM architecture and in my view
it is the most reasonable MTOM implementation we can do on OM.But I
strongly think we should wait till the F2F to discuss MTOM in bit more
detail and then do it. Since MTOM is a major turn, my guess is we
should do this patiently, rather than in a hurry.
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:21:56 +0600, Eran Chinthaka
<ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> Well, I went through MTOM architecture a bit. For me the architecture is
> good and it integrates with OM smoothly.
>
> So I'd like to integrate MTOM in to the main area.
>
> And this is my +1 for Sanjiva's idea to propose Thilina as a committer.
>
> -- Chinthaka
>
--
Ajith Ranabahu
Re: [VOTE][axis2] Thilina for Axis2 commiter
Posted by Ajith Ranabahu <aj...@gmail.com>.
Here's my +1 for Thilina
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:59:17 +0600, Srinath Perera <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1, welcome abroad
>
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:59:55 +0600, Eran Chinthaka
> <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > +1 for Thilina as a committer.
> >
> > Welcome aboard !!! ;)
> >
> > -- Chinthaka
> >
> > >
> > > Chathura Herath wrote:
> > >
> > > >Here is my +1 for Thilina's committership proposal.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > alek
> > >
> >
> >
>
--
Ajith Ranabahu
Re: [VOTE][axis2] Thilina for Axis2 commiter
Posted by Srinath Perera <he...@gmail.com>.
+1, welcome abroad
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:59:55 +0600, Eran Chinthaka
<ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> +1 for Thilina as a committer.
>
> Welcome aboard !!! ;)
>
> -- Chinthaka
>
> >
> > Chathura Herath wrote:
> >
> > >Here is my +1 for Thilina's committership proposal.
> > >
> > >
> > +1
> >
> > alek
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE][axis2] Thilina for Axis2 commiter [Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 01:10:34 -0800 (PST), Dasarath Weeratunge
<da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> --Dasarath
>
> --- Aleksander Slominski <as...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
>
> > Chathura Herath wrote:
> >
> > >Here is my +1 for Thilina's committership proposal.
> > >
> > >
> > +1
> >
> > alek
> >
> > >I am with the idea that we should go ahead and
> > MTOMize the OM if we have the
> > >right impl. Thilina's Architecture looks fine to
> > me, but would like to see a
> > >bit of a documentation and other views (if any)
> > too.
> > >
> > >Regards
> > >Chathura
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: Deepal Jayasinghe
> > [mailto:deepal@opensource.lk]
> > >>Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:41 AM
> > >>To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > >>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
> > >>
> > >>Here is my +1 for the vote to propose Thilina as a
> > committer
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Deepal.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Well, I went through MTOM architecture a bit. For
> > me the architecture is
> > >>>good and it integrates with OM smoothly.
> > >>>
> > >>>So I'd like to integrate MTOM in to the main
> > area.
> > >>>
> > >>>And this is my +1 for Sanjiva's idea to propose
> > Thilina as a committer.
> > >>>
> > >>>-- Chinthaka
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>-----Original Message-----
> > >>>>From: Sanjiva Weerawarana
> > [mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk]
> > >>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:52 PM
> > >>>>To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Ajith Ranabahu;
> > dims@apache.org
> > >>>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Defer until F2F discussion on the right arch for
> > MTOM support?
> > >>>>The last time we had the discussion on the list
> > IIRC there were
> > >>>>multiple proposals .. but now we have at least
> > one concrete
> > >>>>realization.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>In any case, seems to me we should put up
> > Thilina for committer?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Sanjiva.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>----- Original Message -----
> > >>>>From: "Ajith Ranabahu"
> > <aj...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>; <di...@apache.org>
> > >>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:07 PM
> > >>>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>Hi dims,
> > >>>>>Well I don't think we should commit MTOM stuff
> > directly into the main
> > >>>>>area. Since we have not yet agreed officially
> > on any MTOM
> > >>>>>representation mechanism, my guess is we should
> > keep it in the
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>scratch
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>>>area for the time being.
> > >>>>>(Actually that is why we did not commit it in
> > the main area in the
> > >>>>>first place :))
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:01:35 -0500, Davanum
> > Srinivas
> > >>>>><da...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>>can someone integrate the mtom stuff into the
> > main area?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>-- dims
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:54:15 +0600, Thilina
> > Gunarathne
> > >>>>>><cs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>Hi,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>Please apply the patch to
> > scratch/thilina/mtom folder.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>Thilina.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>--
> > >>>>>>Davanum Srinivas -
> > http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>--
> > >>>>>Ajith Ranabahu
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > The best way to predict the future is to invent it -
> > Alan Kay
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
Re: [VOTE][axis2] Thilina for Axis2 commiter [Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
Posted by Thilina Gunarathne <cs...@gmail.com>.
Hi Venkat,
First of all Thanks for ur vote :).
At the moment there is no SAAJ implementation for AXIS2. In any case
if somebody wants to have a SAAJ implementation for AXIS2 , hopefully
they'll be able to get it done by writing a wrapper for this MTOM
impl.:)
regards,
-Thilina
thilina@opensource.lk
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:44:47 +0530, Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for Thilina as committer. Thilina, though i did not interact with
> you, I've seen your MTOM code - pretty good. btw, is it possible to
> reuse this while implementing SAAJ ?
>
> Welcome aboard !!
> Venkat
>
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 22:53:38 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana
> <sa...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > +1!
> >
> > Sanjiva.
> >
>
Re: [VOTE][axis2] Thilina for Axis2 commiter [Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
Posted by Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com>.
+1 for Thilina as committer. Thilina, though i did not interact with
you, I've seen your MTOM code - pretty good. btw, is it possible to
reuse this while implementing SAAJ ?
Welcome aboard !!
Venkat
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 22:53:38 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana
<sa...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> +1!
>
> Sanjiva.
>
Re: [VOTE][axis2] Thilina for Axis2 commiter [Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
+1!
Sanjiva.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aleksander Slominski" <as...@cs.indiana.edu>
To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 10:29 AM
Subject: [VOTE][axis2] Thilina for Axis2 commiter [Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
> Chathura Herath wrote:
>
> >Here is my +1 for Thilina's committership proposal.
> >
> >
> +1
>
> alek
>
> >I am with the idea that we should go ahead and MTOMize the OM if we have
the
> >right impl. Thilina's Architecture looks fine to me, but would like to
see a
> >bit of a documentation and other views (if any) too.
> >
> >Regards
> >Chathura
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Deepal Jayasinghe [mailto:deepal@opensource.lk]
> >>Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:41 AM
> >>To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> >>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
> >>
> >>Here is my +1 for the vote to propose Thilina as a committer
> >>
> >>
> >>Deepal.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Well, I went through MTOM architecture a bit. For me the architecture
is
> >>>good and it integrates with OM smoothly.
> >>>
> >>>So I'd like to integrate MTOM in to the main area.
> >>>
> >>>And this is my +1 for Sanjiva's idea to propose Thilina as a committer.
> >>>
> >>>-- Chinthaka
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk]
> >>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:52 PM
> >>>>To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Ajith Ranabahu; dims@apache.org
> >>>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
> >>>>
> >>>>Defer until F2F discussion on the right arch for MTOM support?
> >>>>The last time we had the discussion on the list IIRC there were
> >>>>multiple proposals .. but now we have at least one concrete
> >>>>realization.
> >>>>
> >>>>In any case, seems to me we should put up Thilina for committer?
> >>>>
> >>>>Sanjiva.
> >>>>
> >>>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>>From: "Ajith Ranabahu" <aj...@gmail.com>
> >>>>To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>; <di...@apache.org>
> >>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:07 PM
> >>>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Hi dims,
> >>>>>Well I don't think we should commit MTOM stuff directly into the main
> >>>>>area. Since we have not yet agreed officially on any MTOM
> >>>>>representation mechanism, my guess is we should keep it in the
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>scratch
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>area for the time being.
> >>>>>(Actually that is why we did not commit it in the main area in the
> >>>>>first place :))
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:01:35 -0500, Davanum Srinivas
> >>>>><da...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>can someone integrate the mtom stuff into the main area?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>-- dims
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:54:15 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne
> >>>>>><cs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Please apply the patch to scratch/thilina/mtom folder.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Thanks,
> >>>>>>>Thilina.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>--
> >>>>>>Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>Ajith Ranabahu
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay
>
>
RE: [VOTE][axis2] Thilina for Axis2 commiter
Posted by Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk>.
+1 for Thilina as a committer.
Welcome aboard !!! ;)
-- Chinthaka
>
> Chathura Herath wrote:
>
> >Here is my +1 for Thilina's committership proposal.
> >
> >
> +1
>
> alek
>
RE: [VOTE][axis2] Thilina for Axis2 commiter [Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
Posted by Jaliya Ekanayake <ja...@opensource.lk>.
Here is my +1 for Thilina
Thanks,
Jaliya
-----Original Message-----
From: Aleksander Slominski [mailto:aslom@cs.indiana.edu]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 10:30 AM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE][axis2] Thilina for Axis2 commiter [Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
Chathura Herath wrote:
>Here is my +1 for Thilina's committership proposal.
>
>
+1
alek
>I am with the idea that we should go ahead and MTOMize the OM if we have
the
>right impl. Thilina's Architecture looks fine to me, but would like to see
a
>bit of a documentation and other views (if any) too.
>
>Regards
>Chathura
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Deepal Jayasinghe [mailto:deepal@opensource.lk]
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:41 AM
>>To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
>>
>>Here is my +1 for the vote to propose Thilina as a committer
>>
>>
>>Deepal.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Well, I went through MTOM architecture a bit. For me the architecture is
>>>good and it integrates with OM smoothly.
>>>
>>>So I'd like to integrate MTOM in to the main area.
>>>
>>>And this is my +1 for Sanjiva's idea to propose Thilina as a committer.
>>>
>>>-- Chinthaka
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk]
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:52 PM
>>>>To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Ajith Ranabahu; dims@apache.org
>>>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
>>>>
>>>>Defer until F2F discussion on the right arch for MTOM support?
>>>>The last time we had the discussion on the list IIRC there were
>>>>multiple proposals .. but now we have at least one concrete
>>>>realization.
>>>>
>>>>In any case, seems to me we should put up Thilina for committer?
>>>>
>>>>Sanjiva.
>>>>
>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>From: "Ajith Ranabahu" <aj...@gmail.com>
>>>>To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>; <di...@apache.org>
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:07 PM
>>>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hi dims,
>>>>>Well I don't think we should commit MTOM stuff directly into the main
>>>>>area. Since we have not yet agreed officially on any MTOM
>>>>>representation mechanism, my guess is we should keep it in the
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>scratch
>>
>>
>>>>>area for the time being.
>>>>>(Actually that is why we did not commit it in the main area in the
>>>>>first place :))
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:01:35 -0500, Davanum Srinivas
>>>>><da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>can someone integrate the mtom stuff into the main area?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-- dims
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:54:15 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne
>>>>>><cs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Please apply the patch to scratch/thilina/mtom folder.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>>>Thilina.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>--
>>>>>>Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>Ajith Ranabahu
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
--
The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay
Re: [VOTE][axis2] Thilina for Axis2 commiter [Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
Posted by Dasarath Weeratunge <da...@yahoo.com>.
+1
--Dasarath
--- Aleksander Slominski <as...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
> Chathura Herath wrote:
>
> >Here is my +1 for Thilina's committership proposal.
> >
> >
> +1
>
> alek
>
> >I am with the idea that we should go ahead and
> MTOMize the OM if we have the
> >right impl. Thilina's Architecture looks fine to
> me, but would like to see a
> >bit of a documentation and other views (if any)
> too.
> >
> >Regards
> >Chathura
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Deepal Jayasinghe
> [mailto:deepal@opensource.lk]
> >>Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:41 AM
> >>To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> >>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
> >>
> >>Here is my +1 for the vote to propose Thilina as a
> committer
> >>
> >>
> >>Deepal.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Well, I went through MTOM architecture a bit. For
> me the architecture is
> >>>good and it integrates with OM smoothly.
> >>>
> >>>So I'd like to integrate MTOM in to the main
> area.
> >>>
> >>>And this is my +1 for Sanjiva's idea to propose
> Thilina as a committer.
> >>>
> >>>-- Chinthaka
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>From: Sanjiva Weerawarana
> [mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk]
> >>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:52 PM
> >>>>To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Ajith Ranabahu;
> dims@apache.org
> >>>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
> >>>>
> >>>>Defer until F2F discussion on the right arch for
> MTOM support?
> >>>>The last time we had the discussion on the list
> IIRC there were
> >>>>multiple proposals .. but now we have at least
> one concrete
> >>>>realization.
> >>>>
> >>>>In any case, seems to me we should put up
> Thilina for committer?
> >>>>
> >>>>Sanjiva.
> >>>>
> >>>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>>From: "Ajith Ranabahu"
> <aj...@gmail.com>
> >>>>To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>; <di...@apache.org>
> >>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:07 PM
> >>>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Hi dims,
> >>>>>Well I don't think we should commit MTOM stuff
> directly into the main
> >>>>>area. Since we have not yet agreed officially
> on any MTOM
> >>>>>representation mechanism, my guess is we should
> keep it in the
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>scratch
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>area for the time being.
> >>>>>(Actually that is why we did not commit it in
> the main area in the
> >>>>>first place :))
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:01:35 -0500, Davanum
> Srinivas
> >>>>><da...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>can someone integrate the mtom stuff into the
> main area?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>-- dims
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:54:15 +0600, Thilina
> Gunarathne
> >>>>>><cs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Please apply the patch to
> scratch/thilina/mtom folder.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Thanks,
> >>>>>>>Thilina.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>--
> >>>>>>Davanum Srinivas -
> http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>Ajith Ranabahu
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> The best way to predict the future is to invent it -
> Alan Kay
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
[VOTE][axis2] Thilina for Axis2 commiter [Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
Posted by Aleksander Slominski <as...@cs.indiana.edu>.
Chathura Herath wrote:
>Here is my +1 for Thilina's committership proposal.
>
>
+1
alek
>I am with the idea that we should go ahead and MTOMize the OM if we have the
>right impl. Thilina's Architecture looks fine to me, but would like to see a
>bit of a documentation and other views (if any) too.
>
>Regards
>Chathura
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Deepal Jayasinghe [mailto:deepal@opensource.lk]
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:41 AM
>>To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
>>
>>Here is my +1 for the vote to propose Thilina as a committer
>>
>>
>>Deepal.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Well, I went through MTOM architecture a bit. For me the architecture is
>>>good and it integrates with OM smoothly.
>>>
>>>So I'd like to integrate MTOM in to the main area.
>>>
>>>And this is my +1 for Sanjiva's idea to propose Thilina as a committer.
>>>
>>>-- Chinthaka
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk]
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:52 PM
>>>>To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Ajith Ranabahu; dims@apache.org
>>>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
>>>>
>>>>Defer until F2F discussion on the right arch for MTOM support?
>>>>The last time we had the discussion on the list IIRC there were
>>>>multiple proposals .. but now we have at least one concrete
>>>>realization.
>>>>
>>>>In any case, seems to me we should put up Thilina for committer?
>>>>
>>>>Sanjiva.
>>>>
>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>From: "Ajith Ranabahu" <aj...@gmail.com>
>>>>To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>; <di...@apache.org>
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:07 PM
>>>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hi dims,
>>>>>Well I don't think we should commit MTOM stuff directly into the main
>>>>>area. Since we have not yet agreed officially on any MTOM
>>>>>representation mechanism, my guess is we should keep it in the
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>scratch
>>
>>
>>>>>area for the time being.
>>>>>(Actually that is why we did not commit it in the main area in the
>>>>>first place :))
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:01:35 -0500, Davanum Srinivas
>>>>><da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>can someone integrate the mtom stuff into the main area?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-- dims
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:54:15 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne
>>>>>><cs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Please apply the patch to scratch/thilina/mtom folder.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>>>Thilina.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>--
>>>>>>Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>Ajith Ranabahu
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
--
The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay
RE: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
Posted by Chathura Herath <ch...@opensource.lk>.
Here is my +1 for Thilina's committership proposal.
I am with the idea that we should go ahead and MTOMize the OM if we have the
right impl. Thilina's Architecture looks fine to me, but would like to see a
bit of a documentation and other views (if any) too.
Regards
Chathura
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Deepal Jayasinghe [mailto:deepal@opensource.lk]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:41 AM
> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
>
> Here is my +1 for the vote to propose Thilina as a committer
>
>
> Deepal.
>
>
> > Well, I went through MTOM architecture a bit. For me the architecture is
> > good and it integrates with OM smoothly.
> >
> > So I'd like to integrate MTOM in to the main area.
> >
> > And this is my +1 for Sanjiva's idea to propose Thilina as a committer.
> >
> > -- Chinthaka
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:52 PM
> >> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Ajith Ranabahu; dims@apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
> >>
> >> Defer until F2F discussion on the right arch for MTOM support?
> >> The last time we had the discussion on the list IIRC there were
> >> multiple proposals .. but now we have at least one concrete
> >> realization.
> >>
> >> In any case, seems to me we should put up Thilina for committer?
> >>
> >> Sanjiva.
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Ajith Ranabahu" <aj...@gmail.com>
> >> To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>; <di...@apache.org>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:07 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
> >>
> >>
> >> > Hi dims,
> >> > Well I don't think we should commit MTOM stuff directly into the main
> >> > area. Since we have not yet agreed officially on any MTOM
> >> > representation mechanism, my guess is we should keep it in the
> scratch
> >> > area for the time being.
> >> > (Actually that is why we did not commit it in the main area in the
> >> > first place :))
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:01:35 -0500, Davanum Srinivas
> >> > <da...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > can someone integrate the mtom stuff into the main area?
> >> > >
> >> > > -- dims
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:54:15 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne
> >> > > <cs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Please apply the patch to scratch/thilina/mtom folder.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > Thilina.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Ajith Ranabahu
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
Posted by Deepal Jayasinghe <de...@opensource.lk>.
Here is my +1 for the vote to propose Thilina as a committer
Deepal.
> Well, I went through MTOM architecture a bit. For me the architecture is
> good and it integrates with OM smoothly.
>
> So I'd like to integrate MTOM in to the main area.
>
> And this is my +1 for Sanjiva's idea to propose Thilina as a committer.
>
> -- Chinthaka
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:52 PM
>> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Ajith Ranabahu; dims@apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
>>
>> Defer until F2F discussion on the right arch for MTOM support?
>> The last time we had the discussion on the list IIRC there were
>> multiple proposals .. but now we have at least one concrete
>> realization.
>>
>> In any case, seems to me we should put up Thilina for committer?
>>
>> Sanjiva.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ajith Ranabahu" <aj...@gmail.com>
>> To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>; <di...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:07 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
>>
>>
>> > Hi dims,
>> > Well I don't think we should commit MTOM stuff directly into the main
>> > area. Since we have not yet agreed officially on any MTOM
>> > representation mechanism, my guess is we should keep it in the scratch
>> > area for the time being.
>> > (Actually that is why we did not commit it in the main area in the
>> > first place :))
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:01:35 -0500, Davanum Srinivas
>> > <da...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > can someone integrate the mtom stuff into the main area?
>> > >
>> > > -- dims
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:54:15 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne
>> > > <cs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > Please apply the patch to scratch/thilina/mtom folder.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Thilina.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ajith Ranabahu
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
>
RE: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
Posted by Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk>.
Well, I went through MTOM architecture a bit. For me the architecture is
good and it integrates with OM smoothly.
So I'd like to integrate MTOM in to the main area.
And this is my +1 for Sanjiva's idea to propose Thilina as a committer.
-- Chinthaka
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:52 PM
> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Ajith Ranabahu; dims@apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
>
> Defer until F2F discussion on the right arch for MTOM support?
> The last time we had the discussion on the list IIRC there were
> multiple proposals .. but now we have at least one concrete
> realization.
>
> In any case, seems to me we should put up Thilina for committer?
>
> Sanjiva.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ajith Ranabahu" <aj...@gmail.com>
> To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>; <di...@apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
>
>
> > Hi dims,
> > Well I don't think we should commit MTOM stuff directly into the main
> > area. Since we have not yet agreed officially on any MTOM
> > representation mechanism, my guess is we should keep it in the scratch
> > area for the time being.
> > (Actually that is why we did not commit it in the main area in the
> > first place :))
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:01:35 -0500, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > can someone integrate the mtom stuff into the main area?
> > >
> > > -- dims
> > >
> > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:54:15 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne
> > > <cs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Please apply the patch to scratch/thilina/mtom folder.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Thilina.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ajith Ranabahu
> >
>
Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
Defer until F2F discussion on the right arch for MTOM support?
The last time we had the discussion on the list IIRC there were
multiple proposals .. but now we have at least one concrete
realization.
In any case, seems to me we should put up Thilina for committer?
Sanjiva.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ajith Ranabahu" <aj...@gmail.com>
To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>; <di...@apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
> Hi dims,
> Well I don't think we should commit MTOM stuff directly into the main
> area. Since we have not yet agreed officially on any MTOM
> representation mechanism, my guess is we should keep it in the scratch
> area for the time being.
> (Actually that is why we did not commit it in the main area in the
> first place :))
>
>
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:01:35 -0500, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > can someone integrate the mtom stuff into the main area?
> >
> > -- dims
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:54:15 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne
> > <cs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Please apply the patch to scratch/thilina/mtom folder.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Thilina.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> >
>
>
> --
> Ajith Ranabahu
>
Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
Posted by Ajith Ranabahu <aj...@gmail.com>.
Hi dims,
Well I don't think we should commit MTOM stuff directly into the main
area. Since we have not yet agreed officially on any MTOM
representation mechanism, my guess is we should keep it in the scratch
area for the time being.
(Actually that is why we did not commit it in the main area in the
first place :))
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:01:35 -0500, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> can someone integrate the mtom stuff into the main area?
>
> -- dims
>
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:54:15 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne
> <cs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please apply the patch to scratch/thilina/mtom folder.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thilina.
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
>
--
Ajith Ranabahu
Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
can someone integrate the mtom stuff into the main area?
-- dims
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:54:15 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne
<cs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please apply the patch to scratch/thilina/mtom folder.
>
> Thanks,
> Thilina.
>
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/