You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2007/11/21 01:45:22 UTC
[Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate
[ ] APR-util 1.2.12
voting closes Friday afternoon/evening. Windows .zip's with all those
pesky .mak files on their way by morning.
Bill
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
> Ubuntu 7.10, x86. All good.
> testreslist, albeit running for a long time, succeeded.
Yea - it made me cringe. Really hope we can speed this up for the next
release cycle :-/
> No driver available for sqlite2.
> No driver available for sqlite3.
Yup.
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Nov 21, 2007 2:45 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate
>
> [+1] APR-util 1.2.12
>
Ubuntu 7.10, x86. All good.
testreslist, albeit running for a long time, succeeded.
Note that:
No driver available for sqlite2.
No driver available for sqlite3.
> voting closes Friday afternoon/evening. Windows .zip's with all those
> pesky .mak files on their way by morning.
>
> Bill
>
--
Lucian
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by Bojan Smojver <bo...@rexursive.com>.
On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 09:28 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> I did wait for about 5 minutes before killing it. OK, I'll try again.
Ah, yes. I should have waited another minute!
Passed test on both architectures, so my vote is now +1.
Sorry about the false alarm.
--
Bojan
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by Bojan Smojver <bo...@rexursive.com>.
On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 00:25 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Did it hang, or did you abort before it was done?
I did wait for about 5 minutes before killing it. OK, I'll try again.
--
Bojan
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Fedora 8, i686 and x86_64, testreslist still hangs exactly the same as
> with 1.2.11. I guess r595990 didn't fix that problem after all.
Did it hang, or did you abort before it was done?
I had to wait a good long while (many minutes), but it was ultimately
successful.
Regards,
Graham
--
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Nov 22, 2007 12:13 AM, Bojan Smojver <bo...@rexursive.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 18:45 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate
> >
> > [-1] APR-util 1.2.12
>
> Fedora 8, i686 and x86_64, testreslist still hangs exactly the same as
> with 1.2.11. I guess r595990 didn't fix that problem after all.
>
Hm, it fixed the hang for me (Ubuntu 7.10 x86) and others as I read in
this thread.
Are you sure that it hanged? It runs for a while (a too loongish
while). I initially thought it's still broken but I let it churn in
peace and it finally finished it's task and ended successfully.
this is the time on a dual core 2GHz cpu with no other cpu-bound
applications running:
gringo@lethe:~$ time aprtest/apr-util-1.2.12/test/testall testreslist -v
testreslist : \-|/-|\-|/-|\-|/-|\-|/-|\SUCCESS
All tests passed.
real 4m13.328s
user 0m0.008s
sys 0m0.004s
If it really hanged, I apollogise for being presumptuous :)
--
Lucian
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by Bojan Smojver <bo...@rexursive.com>.
On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 18:45 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate
>
> [-1] APR-util 1.2.12
Fedora 8, i686 and x86_64, testreslist still hangs exactly the same as
with 1.2.11. I guess r595990 didn't fix that problem after all.
PS. Tested against apr-1.2.12, freshly compiled before apr-util-1.2.12.
--
Bojan
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Henry Jen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tested with the tags/1.2.12 from svn, and got the following on
> Solaris Express, with built-in iconv instead of apr-iconv.
>
> testxlate : FAILED 1 of 1
> Line 63: expected <22>, but saw <0>
> Failed Tests Total Fail Failed %
> ===================================================
> testxlate 1 1 100.00%
>
> This is caused by the ISO-8859-1/ISO-8859-2 translate, which according
> to man page is not supported.
Yup - Jeff raised this in respect to another platform.
> Thoughts?
iconv alone isn't enough for apr_xlate portability?
An internal alias list for "common" transformation types?
Define "common"?
Bill
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by Henry Jen <he...@ztune.net>.
Hi,
I tested with the tags/1.2.12 from svn, and got the following on
Solaris Express, with built-in iconv instead of apr-iconv.
testpass : SUCCESS
testmd4 : SUCCESS
testmd5 : SUCCESS
testdbd : SUCCESS
testdate : SUCCESS
testxml : SUCCESS
testxlate : FAILED 1 of 1
Line 63: expected <22>, but saw <0>
testrmm : SUCCESS
testdbm : SUCCESS
testqueue : SUCCESS
testreslist : .........................SUCCESS
Failed Tests Total Fail Failed %
===================================================
testxlate 1 1 100.00%
This is caused by the ISO-8859-1/ISO-8859-2 translate, which according
to man page is not supported.
Thoughts?
Cheers,
Henry
On Nov 21, 2007 12:32 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/21/2007 01:45 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate
> >
> > [+1] APR-util 1.2.12
> >
> > voting closes Friday afternoon/evening. Windows .zip's with all those
> > pesky .mak files on their way by morning.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
>
> Signatures: OK
> md5sums : OK
>
> All tests past with the exception of the following error for sqlite2:
>
> ======== prepared select ========
> Prepare statement failed!
> (null)
> Error in prepared select: rc=70023
>
> ======== prepared query ========
> Prepare statement failed!
> (null)
> Error in prepared query: rc=70023
>
> But this is no regression.
>
> Test were performed on
>
> Solaris 8
> Solaris 9
> Solaris 10
> Red Hat AS 4 64 Bit
> OpenSuSE 10.1 64 Bit
> OpenSuSE 10.2 32 Bit
>
> So +1 from me on apr-util 1.2.12
>
> Regards
>
> Rüdiger
>
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by Bojan Smojver <bo...@rexursive.com>.
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 21:32 +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> All tests past with the exception of the following error for sqlite2:
>
> ======== prepared select ========
> Prepare statement failed!
> (null)
> Error in prepared select: rc=70023
>
> ======== prepared query ========
> Prepare statement failed!
> (null)
> Error in prepared query: rc=70023
>
> But this is no regression.
SQLite2 does not support prepared statements.
--
Bojan
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
On 11/21/2007 01:45 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate
>
> [+1] APR-util 1.2.12
>
> voting closes Friday afternoon/evening. Windows .zip's with all those
> pesky .mak files on their way by morning.
>
> Bill
>
>
Signatures: OK
md5sums : OK
All tests past with the exception of the following error for sqlite2:
======== prepared select ========
Prepare statement failed!
(null)
Error in prepared select: rc=70023
======== prepared query ========
Prepare statement failed!
(null)
Error in prepared query: rc=70023
But this is no regression.
Test were performed on
Solaris 8
Solaris 9
Solaris 10
Red Hat AS 4 64 Bit
OpenSuSE 10.1 64 Bit
OpenSuSE 10.2 32 Bit
So +1 from me on apr-util 1.2.12
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Nov 21, 2007 11:45 PM, Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm> wrote:
> Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
>
> > well you tested the APR 1.2.12
> > this is the APR-UTIL 1.2.12 thread :)
>
> Quite aware of that, I didn't have the original thread handy :(
>
Oh, I thought you mixed them up by mistake :)
FYI, the other thread says that the
testshm : -Line 254: Error destroying shared memory
block (2): No such file or directory
error is a known and expected (and, if i understood right, it tells us
that APR has a badly designed API and that we should do our best to
not repeat this :)
--
Lucian
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
> well you tested the APR 1.2.12
> this is the APR-UTIL 1.2.12 thread :)
Quite aware of that, I didn't have the original thread handy :(
Regards,
Graham
--
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Nov 21, 2007 11:29 PM, Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm> wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate
> >
> > [ ] APR-util 1.2.12
>
> Just tried to run the test suite for apr v1.2.12, and I got this on
> RHEL4/amd64:
>
well you tested the APR 1.2.12
this is the APR-UTIL 1.2.12 thread :)
> testshm : -Line 254: Error destroying shared memory block
> (2): No such file or directory
>
> FAILED 1 of 6
>
> The line that fails is this:
>
> rv = apr_shm_destroy(shm);
> APR_ASSERT_SUCCESS(tc, "Error destroying shared memory block", rv);
>
> Regards,
> Graham
> --
>
--
Lucian
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
On 11/21/2007 10:29 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>> Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate
>>
>> [ ] APR-util 1.2.12
>
> Just tried to run the test suite for apr v1.2.12, and I got this on
> RHEL4/amd64:
>
> testshm : -Line 254: Error destroying shared memory block
> (2): No such file or directory
>
> FAILED 1 of 6
>
> The line that fails is this:
>
> rv = apr_shm_destroy(shm);
> APR_ASSERT_SUCCESS(tc, "Error destroying shared memory block", rv);
This was already discussed at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/200711.mbox/%3cacf3f2e60711151818t3962e0d1q82a2d08769445f8d@mail.gmail.com%3e
and it was said that it is not a regression but "a new illustration of an existing bug".
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Graham Leggett wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>> Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate
>>
>> [ ] APR-util 1.2.12
>
> Just tried to run the test suite for apr v1.2.12, and I got this on
> RHEL4/amd64:
>
> testshm : -Line 254: Error destroying shared memory block
> (2): No such file or directory
>
> FAILED 1 of 6
Thank goodness; since it's a real (and not a regression) bug.
See list archive of last week for detail
Bill
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate
>
> [ ] APR-util 1.2.12
Just tried to run the test suite for apr v1.2.12, and I got this on
RHEL4/amd64:
testshm : -Line 254: Error destroying shared memory block
(2): No such file or directory
FAILED 1 of 6
The line that fails is this:
rv = apr_shm_destroy(shm);
APR_ASSERT_SUCCESS(tc, "Error destroying shared memory block", rv);
Regards,
Graham
--
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate
>
> [ X ] APR-util 1.2.12
+1 for RHEL4/x86_64.
Regards,
Graham
--
Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Nov 20, 2007, at 7:45 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate
>
> [+1] APR-util 1.2.12
>
>
OS X 10.4.11, Sol8