You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hive.apache.org by "BELUGA BEHR (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/12/02 14:58:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (HIVE-20847) Review of NullScan Code

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-20847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

BELUGA BEHR updated HIVE-20847:
-------------------------------
    Attachment: HIVE-20847.2.patch

> Review of NullScan Code
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-20847
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-20847
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Physical Optimizer
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0, 3.2.0
>            Reporter: BELUGA BEHR
>            Assignee: BELUGA BEHR
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HIVE-20847.1.patch, HIVE-20847.1.patch, HIVE-20847.1.patch, HIVE-20847.2.patch
>
>
> What got me looking at this class was the verboseness of some of the logging.  I would like to request that we DEBUG the logging since this level of detail means nothing to a cluster admin.
> Also... this {{contains}} call would be better applied onto a {{HashSet}} instead of an {{ArrayList}}.
> {code:java|title=NullScanTaskDispatcher.java}
>   private void processAlias(MapWork work, Path path, ArrayList<String> aliasesAffected, ArrayList<String> aliases) {
>     // the aliases that are allowed to map to a null scan.
>     ArrayList<String> allowed = new ArrayList<String>();
>     for (String alias : aliasesAffected) {
>       if (aliases.contains(alias)) {
>         allowed.add(alias);
>       }
>     }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)