You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sqoop.apache.org by Eric Wadsworth <er...@wadhome.org> on 2011/12/10 02:18:02 UTC
hadoop versions
Folks,
Sqoop builds with ant just fine. The tests pass ("ant test"). This goes
against hadoop 0.23; at least, that's what shows up in the ivy directories.
But in the pom.xml, there is a different dependency:
<!--
<hadoopVersion>0.20.203.0</hadoopVersion>
-->
<!-- FIXME Cloudera Distribution dependency version -->
<hadoopVersion>0.20.2-cdh3u1</hadoopVersion>
Out of the box, I can build with maven, with just a couple of tweaks
(skipping tests because one fails, rm CHANGES.txt to make the RAT
happy). But if I switch to the other version of hadoop, I get lots of
errors.
Why the discrepancy between ant and mvn builds? Or am I missing something?
--- wad
Re: hadoop versions
Posted by Kate Ting <ka...@cloudera.com>.
Hi Jarcec - suggestions on what pom.xml should be renamed to?
Regards, Kate
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm in. Let's rename the pom.xml to something different.
>
> Jarcec
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:42:48AM -0800, arvind@cloudera.com wrote:
>> Thanks Jarcec. I agree that if we are not going to support maven on trunk
>> for now, we should close the related issues you pointed out.
>>
>> Regarding publishing of maven artifacts for Sqoop - that is still possible.
>> I understand that using IVY you can generate the necessary POM artifacts. I
>> believe Bilung recently did that exercise while doing the 1.4.0 release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Arvind
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@aparche.org>wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Arvind,
>> > Netbeans seems to be unable to process differently named pom.xml file.
>> > However I can rename it back on my side manually, so I'm fine with simple
>> > rename.
>> >
>> > If we officially discontinue our effort to move to maven build in 1.x (and
>> > I definitely agree on that), I would also suggest to somehow close issues
>> > regarding move to maven:
>> >
>> > * SQOOP-348
>> > * SQOOP-347
>> > * SQOOP-306
>> >
>> > Also I'm curios whether we are able to push our artifacts to Apache Maven
>> > repo as is requested in SQOOP-396 without proper pom.xml file?
>> >
>> > Jarcec
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:22:20AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>> > > In that case, how about renaming the pom.xml to something else? You
>> > > would you still be able to use it using the -f argument. Would that
>> > > work?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Arvind
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>> > > <ja...@avg.com> wrote:
>> > > > Please don't, I'm actually using it :-$
>> > > >
>> > > > Jarcec
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:48:59AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>> > > >> Agreed. As a matter of fact, we should remove POM from the 1.x branch
>> > > >> as it is confusing to many.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I have filed SQOOP-408 to track this.
>> > > >> Thanks,Arvind
>> > > >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Eric Wadsworth <er...@wadhome.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >> > Arvind,
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Thanks for the info!
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Perhaps there should be a comment in the pom explaining this.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > --- wad
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On 12/12/2011 09:06 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> Hi Eric,
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> For the 1.x code line (trunk), we are not investing in fixing the
>> > > >> >> maven build. Instead the focus is entirely on using ant. Once we
>> > cut
>> > > >> >> over to the next major revision, we will switch to a maven only
>> > build.
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> Thanks,
>> > > >> >> Arvind
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Eric Wadsworth<er...@wadhome.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> Folks,
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> Sqoop builds with ant just fine. The tests pass ("ant test").
>> > This goes
>> > > >> >>> against hadoop 0.23; at least, that's what shows up in the ivy
>> > > >> >>> directories.
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> But in the pom.xml, there is a different dependency:
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> <!--
>> > > >> >>> <hadoopVersion>0.20.203.0</hadoopVersion>
>> > > >> >>> -->
>> > > >> >>> <!-- FIXME Cloudera Distribution dependency version -->
>> > > >> >>> <hadoopVersion>0.20.2-cdh3u1</hadoopVersion>
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> Out of the box, I can build with maven, with just a couple of
>> > tweaks
>> > > >> >>> (skipping tests because one fails, rm CHANGES.txt to make the RAT
>> > happy).
>> > > >> >>> But if I switch to the other version of hadoop, I get lots of
>> > errors.
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> Why the discrepancy between ant and mvn builds? Or am I missing
>> > > >> >>> something?
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> --- wad
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> >
Re: hadoop versions
Posted by Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>.
I'm in. Let's rename the pom.xml to something different.
Jarcec
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:42:48AM -0800, arvind@cloudera.com wrote:
> Thanks Jarcec. I agree that if we are not going to support maven on trunk
> for now, we should close the related issues you pointed out.
>
> Regarding publishing of maven artifacts for Sqoop - that is still possible.
> I understand that using IVY you can generate the necessary POM artifacts. I
> believe Bilung recently did that exercise while doing the 1.4.0 release.
>
> Thanks,
> Arvind
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@aparche.org>wrote:
>
> > Hi Arvind,
> > Netbeans seems to be unable to process differently named pom.xml file.
> > However I can rename it back on my side manually, so I'm fine with simple
> > rename.
> >
> > If we officially discontinue our effort to move to maven build in 1.x (and
> > I definitely agree on that), I would also suggest to somehow close issues
> > regarding move to maven:
> >
> > * SQOOP-348
> > * SQOOP-347
> > * SQOOP-306
> >
> > Also I'm curios whether we are able to push our artifacts to Apache Maven
> > repo as is requested in SQOOP-396 without proper pom.xml file?
> >
> > Jarcec
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:22:20AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> > > In that case, how about renaming the pom.xml to something else? You
> > > would you still be able to use it using the -f argument. Would that
> > > work?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Arvind
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> > > <ja...@avg.com> wrote:
> > > > Please don't, I'm actually using it :-$
> > > >
> > > > Jarcec
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:48:59AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> > > >> Agreed. As a matter of fact, we should remove POM from the 1.x branch
> > > >> as it is confusing to many.
> > > >>
> > > >> I have filed SQOOP-408 to track this.
> > > >> Thanks,Arvind
> > > >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Eric Wadsworth <er...@wadhome.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >> > Arvind,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks for the info!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Perhaps there should be a comment in the pom explaining this.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --- wad
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On 12/12/2011 09:06 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Hi Eric,
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> For the 1.x code line (trunk), we are not investing in fixing the
> > > >> >> maven build. Instead the focus is entirely on using ant. Once we
> > cut
> > > >> >> over to the next major revision, we will switch to a maven only
> > build.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Thanks,
> > > >> >> Arvind
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Eric Wadsworth<er...@wadhome.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Folks,
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Sqoop builds with ant just fine. The tests pass ("ant test").
> > This goes
> > > >> >>> against hadoop 0.23; at least, that's what shows up in the ivy
> > > >> >>> directories.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> But in the pom.xml, there is a different dependency:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> <!--
> > > >> >>> <hadoopVersion>0.20.203.0</hadoopVersion>
> > > >> >>> -->
> > > >> >>> <!-- FIXME Cloudera Distribution dependency version -->
> > > >> >>> <hadoopVersion>0.20.2-cdh3u1</hadoopVersion>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Out of the box, I can build with maven, with just a couple of
> > tweaks
> > > >> >>> (skipping tests because one fails, rm CHANGES.txt to make the RAT
> > happy).
> > > >> >>> But if I switch to the other version of hadoop, I get lots of
> > errors.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Why the discrepancy between ant and mvn builds? Or am I missing
> > > >> >>> something?
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> --- wad
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> >
Re: hadoop versions
Posted by "arvind@cloudera.com" <ar...@cloudera.com>.
Thanks Jarcec. I agree that if we are not going to support maven on trunk
for now, we should close the related issues you pointed out.
Regarding publishing of maven artifacts for Sqoop - that is still possible.
I understand that using IVY you can generate the necessary POM artifacts. I
believe Bilung recently did that exercise while doing the 1.4.0 release.
Thanks,
Arvind
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@aparche.org>wrote:
> Hi Arvind,
> Netbeans seems to be unable to process differently named pom.xml file.
> However I can rename it back on my side manually, so I'm fine with simple
> rename.
>
> If we officially discontinue our effort to move to maven build in 1.x (and
> I definitely agree on that), I would also suggest to somehow close issues
> regarding move to maven:
>
> * SQOOP-348
> * SQOOP-347
> * SQOOP-306
>
> Also I'm curios whether we are able to push our artifacts to Apache Maven
> repo as is requested in SQOOP-396 without proper pom.xml file?
>
> Jarcec
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:22:20AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> > In that case, how about renaming the pom.xml to something else? You
> > would you still be able to use it using the -f argument. Would that
> > work?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Arvind
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> > <ja...@avg.com> wrote:
> > > Please don't, I'm actually using it :-$
> > >
> > > Jarcec
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:48:59AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> > >> Agreed. As a matter of fact, we should remove POM from the 1.x branch
> > >> as it is confusing to many.
> > >>
> > >> I have filed SQOOP-408 to track this.
> > >> Thanks,Arvind
> > >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Eric Wadsworth <er...@wadhome.org>
> wrote:
> > >> > Arvind,
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks for the info!
> > >> >
> > >> > Perhaps there should be a comment in the pom explaining this.
> > >> >
> > >> > --- wad
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On 12/12/2011 09:06 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Hi Eric,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> For the 1.x code line (trunk), we are not investing in fixing the
> > >> >> maven build. Instead the focus is entirely on using ant. Once we
> cut
> > >> >> over to the next major revision, we will switch to a maven only
> build.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks,
> > >> >> Arvind
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Eric Wadsworth<er...@wadhome.org>
> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Folks,
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Sqoop builds with ant just fine. The tests pass ("ant test").
> This goes
> > >> >>> against hadoop 0.23; at least, that's what shows up in the ivy
> > >> >>> directories.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> But in the pom.xml, there is a different dependency:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> <!--
> > >> >>> <hadoopVersion>0.20.203.0</hadoopVersion>
> > >> >>> -->
> > >> >>> <!-- FIXME Cloudera Distribution dependency version -->
> > >> >>> <hadoopVersion>0.20.2-cdh3u1</hadoopVersion>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Out of the box, I can build with maven, with just a couple of
> tweaks
> > >> >>> (skipping tests because one fails, rm CHANGES.txt to make the RAT
> happy).
> > >> >>> But if I switch to the other version of hadoop, I get lots of
> errors.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Why the discrepancy between ant and mvn builds? Or am I missing
> > >> >>> something?
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> --- wad
> > >> >
> > >> >
>
Re: hadoop versions
Posted by Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@aparche.org>.
Hi Arvind,
Netbeans seems to be unable to process differently named pom.xml file. However I can rename it back on my side manually, so I'm fine with simple rename.
If we officially discontinue our effort to move to maven build in 1.x (and I definitely agree on that), I would also suggest to somehow close issues regarding move to maven:
* SQOOP-348
* SQOOP-347
* SQOOP-306
Also I'm curios whether we are able to push our artifacts to Apache Maven repo as is requested in SQOOP-396 without proper pom.xml file?
Jarcec
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:22:20AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> In that case, how about renaming the pom.xml to something else? You
> would you still be able to use it using the -f argument. Would that
> work?
>
> Thanks,
> Arvind
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> <ja...@avg.com> wrote:
> > Please don't, I'm actually using it :-$
> >
> > Jarcec
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:48:59AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> >> Agreed. As a matter of fact, we should remove POM from the 1.x branch
> >> as it is confusing to many.
> >>
> >> I have filed SQOOP-408 to track this.
> >> Thanks,Arvind
> >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Eric Wadsworth <er...@wadhome.org> wrote:
> >> > Arvind,
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the info!
> >> >
> >> > Perhaps there should be a comment in the pom explaining this.
> >> >
> >> > --- wad
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 12/12/2011 09:06 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Eric,
> >> >>
> >> >> For the 1.x code line (trunk), we are not investing in fixing the
> >> >> maven build. Instead the focus is entirely on using ant. Once we cut
> >> >> over to the next major revision, we will switch to a maven only build.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Arvind
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Eric Wadsworth<er...@wadhome.org> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Folks,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Sqoop builds with ant just fine. The tests pass ("ant test"). This goes
> >> >>> against hadoop 0.23; at least, that's what shows up in the ivy
> >> >>> directories.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> But in the pom.xml, there is a different dependency:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> <!--
> >> >>> <hadoopVersion>0.20.203.0</hadoopVersion>
> >> >>> -->
> >> >>> <!-- FIXME Cloudera Distribution dependency version -->
> >> >>> <hadoopVersion>0.20.2-cdh3u1</hadoopVersion>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Out of the box, I can build with maven, with just a couple of tweaks
> >> >>> (skipping tests because one fails, rm CHANGES.txt to make the RAT happy).
> >> >>> But if I switch to the other version of hadoop, I get lots of errors.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Why the discrepancy between ant and mvn builds? Or am I missing
> >> >>> something?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --- wad
> >> >
> >> >
Re: hadoop versions
Posted by Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org>.
In that case, how about renaming the pom.xml to something else? You
would you still be able to use it using the -f argument. Would that
work?
Thanks,
Arvind
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho
<ja...@avg.com> wrote:
> Please don't, I'm actually using it :-$
>
> Jarcec
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:48:59AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>> Agreed. As a matter of fact, we should remove POM from the 1.x branch
>> as it is confusing to many.
>>
>> I have filed SQOOP-408 to track this.
>> Thanks,Arvind
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Eric Wadsworth <er...@wadhome.org> wrote:
>> > Arvind,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the info!
>> >
>> > Perhaps there should be a comment in the pom explaining this.
>> >
>> > --- wad
>> >
>> >
>> > On 12/12/2011 09:06 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Eric,
>> >>
>> >> For the 1.x code line (trunk), we are not investing in fixing the
>> >> maven build. Instead the focus is entirely on using ant. Once we cut
>> >> over to the next major revision, we will switch to a maven only build.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Arvind
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Eric Wadsworth<er...@wadhome.org> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Folks,
>> >>>
>> >>> Sqoop builds with ant just fine. The tests pass ("ant test"). This goes
>> >>> against hadoop 0.23; at least, that's what shows up in the ivy
>> >>> directories.
>> >>>
>> >>> But in the pom.xml, there is a different dependency:
>> >>>
>> >>> <!--
>> >>> <hadoopVersion>0.20.203.0</hadoopVersion>
>> >>> -->
>> >>> <!-- FIXME Cloudera Distribution dependency version -->
>> >>> <hadoopVersion>0.20.2-cdh3u1</hadoopVersion>
>> >>>
>> >>> Out of the box, I can build with maven, with just a couple of tweaks
>> >>> (skipping tests because one fails, rm CHANGES.txt to make the RAT happy).
>> >>> But if I switch to the other version of hadoop, I get lots of errors.
>> >>>
>> >>> Why the discrepancy between ant and mvn builds? Or am I missing
>> >>> something?
>> >>>
>> >>> --- wad
>> >
>> >
Re: hadoop versions
Posted by Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@avg.com>.
Please don't, I'm actually using it :-$
Jarcec
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:48:59AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> Agreed. As a matter of fact, we should remove POM from the 1.x branch
> as it is confusing to many.
>
> I have filed SQOOP-408 to track this.
> Thanks,Arvind
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Eric Wadsworth <er...@wadhome.org> wrote:
> > Arvind,
> >
> > Thanks for the info!
> >
> > Perhaps there should be a comment in the pom explaining this.
> >
> > --- wad
> >
> >
> > On 12/12/2011 09:06 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Eric,
> >>
> >> For the 1.x code line (trunk), we are not investing in fixing the
> >> maven build. Instead the focus is entirely on using ant. Once we cut
> >> over to the next major revision, we will switch to a maven only build.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Arvind
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Eric Wadsworth<er...@wadhome.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Folks,
> >>>
> >>> Sqoop builds with ant just fine. The tests pass ("ant test"). This goes
> >>> against hadoop 0.23; at least, that's what shows up in the ivy
> >>> directories.
> >>>
> >>> But in the pom.xml, there is a different dependency:
> >>>
> >>> <!--
> >>> <hadoopVersion>0.20.203.0</hadoopVersion>
> >>> -->
> >>> <!-- FIXME Cloudera Distribution dependency version -->
> >>> <hadoopVersion>0.20.2-cdh3u1</hadoopVersion>
> >>>
> >>> Out of the box, I can build with maven, with just a couple of tweaks
> >>> (skipping tests because one fails, rm CHANGES.txt to make the RAT happy).
> >>> But if I switch to the other version of hadoop, I get lots of errors.
> >>>
> >>> Why the discrepancy between ant and mvn builds? Or am I missing
> >>> something?
> >>>
> >>> --- wad
> >
> >
Re: hadoop versions
Posted by Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org>.
Agreed. As a matter of fact, we should remove POM from the 1.x branch
as it is confusing to many.
I have filed SQOOP-408 to track this.
Thanks,Arvind
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Eric Wadsworth <er...@wadhome.org> wrote:
> Arvind,
>
> Thanks for the info!
>
> Perhaps there should be a comment in the pom explaining this.
>
> --- wad
>
>
> On 12/12/2011 09:06 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> For the 1.x code line (trunk), we are not investing in fixing the
>> maven build. Instead the focus is entirely on using ant. Once we cut
>> over to the next major revision, we will switch to a maven only build.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Arvind
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Eric Wadsworth<er...@wadhome.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> Sqoop builds with ant just fine. The tests pass ("ant test"). This goes
>>> against hadoop 0.23; at least, that's what shows up in the ivy
>>> directories.
>>>
>>> But in the pom.xml, there is a different dependency:
>>>
>>> <!--
>>> <hadoopVersion>0.20.203.0</hadoopVersion>
>>> -->
>>> <!-- FIXME Cloudera Distribution dependency version -->
>>> <hadoopVersion>0.20.2-cdh3u1</hadoopVersion>
>>>
>>> Out of the box, I can build with maven, with just a couple of tweaks
>>> (skipping tests because one fails, rm CHANGES.txt to make the RAT happy).
>>> But if I switch to the other version of hadoop, I get lots of errors.
>>>
>>> Why the discrepancy between ant and mvn builds? Or am I missing
>>> something?
>>>
>>> --- wad
>
>
Re: hadoop versions
Posted by Eric Wadsworth <er...@wadhome.org>.
Arvind,
Thanks for the info!
Perhaps there should be a comment in the pom explaining this.
--- wad
On 12/12/2011 09:06 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> For the 1.x code line (trunk), we are not investing in fixing the
> maven build. Instead the focus is entirely on using ant. Once we cut
> over to the next major revision, we will switch to a maven only build.
>
> Thanks,
> Arvind
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Eric Wadsworth<er...@wadhome.org> wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> Sqoop builds with ant just fine. The tests pass ("ant test"). This goes
>> against hadoop 0.23; at least, that's what shows up in the ivy directories.
>>
>> But in the pom.xml, there is a different dependency:
>>
>> <!--
>> <hadoopVersion>0.20.203.0</hadoopVersion>
>> -->
>> <!-- FIXME Cloudera Distribution dependency version -->
>> <hadoopVersion>0.20.2-cdh3u1</hadoopVersion>
>>
>> Out of the box, I can build with maven, with just a couple of tweaks
>> (skipping tests because one fails, rm CHANGES.txt to make the RAT happy).
>> But if I switch to the other version of hadoop, I get lots of errors.
>>
>> Why the discrepancy between ant and mvn builds? Or am I missing something?
>>
>> --- wad
Re: hadoop versions
Posted by Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi Eric,
For the 1.x code line (trunk), we are not investing in fixing the
maven build. Instead the focus is entirely on using ant. Once we cut
over to the next major revision, we will switch to a maven only build.
Thanks,
Arvind
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Eric Wadsworth <er...@wadhome.org> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Sqoop builds with ant just fine. The tests pass ("ant test"). This goes
> against hadoop 0.23; at least, that's what shows up in the ivy directories.
>
> But in the pom.xml, there is a different dependency:
>
> <!--
> <hadoopVersion>0.20.203.0</hadoopVersion>
> -->
> <!-- FIXME Cloudera Distribution dependency version -->
> <hadoopVersion>0.20.2-cdh3u1</hadoopVersion>
>
> Out of the box, I can build with maven, with just a couple of tweaks
> (skipping tests because one fails, rm CHANGES.txt to make the RAT happy).
> But if I switch to the other version of hadoop, I get lots of errors.
>
> Why the discrepancy between ant and mvn builds? Or am I missing something?
>
> --- wad