ReverseMappingTool: can I turn off the generation of orm.xml?

[Laird Nelson <lj...@gmail.com>]

I was unable to figure out from the documentation here () how to turn off
the generation of the orm.xml file.

I don't actually care, but there seems to be a bug in the tool.  If I run
the mapper twice, it appears that the orm.xml file's being present on the
second run causes the tool to crash.  I'll detail this in another email,
but, quite frankly, I would prefer to use annotations anyhow.

Any help gratefully appreciated.

Best,
Laird

Re: ReverseMappingTool: can I turn off the generation of orm.xml?

[ljnelson <lj...@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:07 PM, emiddio-verizon [via OpenJPA] <
ml-node+3868892-1783942138@n2.nabble.com<ml...@n2.nabble.com>
> wrote:

> i find this also -- but the example - reversemapping build.xml tries to
> move
> the orm.xml,
>

Aha, solved the problem.  The "-metadata none" option suppresses the
generation of the orm.xml file.

Best,
Laird

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/ReverseMappingTool-can-I-turn-off-the-generation-of-orm-xml-tp3868523p3869424.html
Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ReverseMappingTool: can I turn off the generation of orm.xml?

[emiddio-verizon <em...@verizon.net>]

i find this also -- but the example - reversemapping build.xml tries to move 
the orm.xml,

on win7 it can copy the file but the move does not delete it -- i added ant 
target to
remove the file -- which works.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Laird Nelson" <lj...@gmail.com>
To: <us...@openjpa.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 2:01 PM
Subject: ReverseMappingTool: can I turn off the generation of orm.xml?


>I was unable to figure out from the documentation here () how to turn off
> the generation of the orm.xml file.
>
> I don't actually care, but there seems to be a bug in the tool.  If I run
> the mapper twice, it appears that the orm.xml file's being present on the
> second run causes the tool to crash.  I'll detail this in another email,
> but, quite frankly, I would prefer to use annotations anyhow.
>
> Any help gratefully appreciated.
>
> Best,
> Laird
>