You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org> on 2008/11/16 20:17:03 UTC
Luke bugs (Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1454) Corrupted index produced
by lucene 2.4)
Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote:
> [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12647960#action_12647960 ]
>
> Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1454:
> --------------------------------------------
>
> You're right, Luke is saying that!
>
> But, that's a misleading error -- here are the sources in Luke for that error:
>
> {code}
> fn = ir.getFieldNames(IndexReader.FieldOption.ALL);
> if (fn.size() == 0) {
> errorMsg("Invalid or corrupted index.");
> return;
> }
> {code}
>
> So, what Luke really means is there are 0 fields found in the index, ie it's an empty index.
You're lucky that I spotted this message ... ;)
I'll fix it in the next minor release of Luke, pretty soon.
However, in the future please notify me about any suspected bugs in
Luke, otherwise I may miss reports like this.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Luke bugs (Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1454) Corrupted index produced by lucene 2.4)
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
OK will do :) Nice that you're paying attention!
Mike
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote:
>> [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12647960
>> #action_12647960 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1454:
>> --------------------------------------------
>> You're right, Luke is saying that!
>> But, that's a misleading error -- here are the sources in Luke for
>> that error:
>> {code}
>> fn = ir.getFieldNames(IndexReader.FieldOption.ALL);
>> if (fn.size() == 0) {
>> errorMsg("Invalid or corrupted index.");
>> return;
>> }
>> {code}
>> So, what Luke really means is there are 0 fields found in the
>> index, ie it's an empty index.
>
> You're lucky that I spotted this message ... ;)
>
> I'll fix it in the next minor release of Luke, pretty soon.
>
> However, in the future please notify me about any suspected bugs in
> Luke, otherwise I may miss reports like this.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrzej Bialecki <><
> ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
> [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
> ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
> http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org