You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mailet-api@james.apache.org by Bernd Fondermann <bf...@brainlounge.de> on 2009/07/15 14:49:18 UTC
Re: Retiring Gump? Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project james-mailet (in module
james-mailet) failed
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there anyone that is interested in keeping GUMP for JAMES running?
> I see in the last years we always had hundred of recurring gump errors
> for projects that are working in Hudson.
> AFAICT no ASF project depends on James artifacts/gump definitions, so
> can't we simply dismiss this stuff and stop receiving this build
> failures if no one take care of them? (I don't even know where the
> configuration for this stuff is and how to fix or remove it).
>
> Since 30/04/2009 this list received once a day this message and no
> useful message. Serge already "complained" for this, and I'm complaining
> now.
>
> Is anyone against disabling/removing/retiring GUMP for JAMES?
+1, disable it.
Bernd
Re: Retiring Gump? Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project james-mailet (in module
james-mailet) failed
Posted by Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini <vi...@gianferrari.org>.
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is there anyone that is interested in keeping GUMP for JAMES running?
> > I see in the last years we always had hundred of recurring gump errors
> > for projects that are working in Hudson.
> > AFAICT no ASF project depends on James artifacts/gump definitions, so
> > can't we simply dismiss this stuff and stop receiving this build
> > failures if no one take care of them? (I don't even know where the
> > configuration for this stuff is and how to fix or remove it).
> >
> > Since 30/04/2009 this list received once a day this message and no
> > useful message. Serge already "complained" for this, and I'm complaining
> > now.
> >
> > Is anyone against disabling/removing/retiring GUMP for JAMES?
>
> +1 to remove it
Vincenzo