You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@ws.apache.org by ar...@cornell.edu on 2002/04/08 14:24:14 UTC
re: interceptors patch
The patch should cleanly apply to 1.1. And of course, I forgot the whole
domain, it's: http://aeolus.cit.cornell.edu/xmlrpc/xmlrpc.html
patch:
http://aeolus.cit.cornell.edu/xmlrpc/interceptors-introspection.patch
Aaron
----------
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 15:43:49 +0200
From: matjaz.ostroversnik@zrs-tk.si
To: rpc-user@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sessions
[The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set]
[Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set]
[Some characters may be displayed incorrectly]
Hi Aron
Could you update the patch to version xmlrpc-1.1 (from Apache).
The patch you provided mostly fails.
Re: interceptors patch
Posted by ma...@zrs-tk.si.
I was able to find the patch, but I was unable to patch it.
Some chunks went smooth while at least 20 in different files
(mostly WebServer and XmlRpcServer) didn't.
I tried to do the remains (rje files) manually but at the end of the
process the code didn't compile since some classes was missing.
Are you sure we are talking about the same package (apache xml-rpc)?
I think your patch expects if clausses in form
if <cond> <something>
while code has
if <cond>
{
<something>
}
but that is an easy part. Most of other are more troublesome.
Could you spend just a one minute more on this problem?
Please download fresh copy of apache xml-rpc and try to apply
the patch on it. I am nearly 100% sure that something is wrong
(eather my procedure or your patch).
Thanks in advance
Matjaz
----- Original Message -----
From: <ar...@cornell.edu>
To: <rp...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 2:24 PM
Subject: re: interceptors patch
>
> The patch should cleanly apply to 1.1. And of course, I forgot the whole
> domain, it's: http://aeolus.cit.cornell.edu/xmlrpc/xmlrpc.html
>
> patch:
> http://aeolus.cit.cornell.edu/xmlrpc/interceptors-introspection.patch
>
> Aaron
>
> ----------
>
> Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 15:43:49 +0200
> From: matjaz.ostroversnik@zrs-tk.si
> To: rpc-user@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Sessions
>
> [The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set]
> [Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set]
> [Some characters may be displayed incorrectly]
>
> Hi Aron
>
> Could you update the patch to version xmlrpc-1.1 (from Apache).
> The patch you provided mostly fails.
>
>
>
>
Re: interceptors patch
Posted by ma...@zrs-tk.si.
I was able to find the patch, but I was unable to patch it.
Some chunks went smooth while at least 20 in different files
(mostly WebServer and XmlRpcServer) didn't.
I tried to do the remains (rje files) manually but at the end of the
process the code didn't compile since some classes was missing.
Are you sure we are talking about the same package (apache xml-rpc)?
I think your patch expects if clausses in form
if <cond> <something>
while code has
if <cond>
{
<something>
}
but that is an easy part. Most of other are more troublesome.
Could you spend just a one minute more on this problem?
Please download fresh copy of apache xml-rpc and try to apply
the patch on it. I am nearly 100% sure that something is wrong
(eather my procedure or your patch).
Thanks in advance
Matjaz
----- Original Message -----
From: <ar...@cornell.edu>
To: <rp...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 2:24 PM
Subject: re: interceptors patch
>
> The patch should cleanly apply to 1.1. And of course, I forgot the whole
> domain, it's: http://aeolus.cit.cornell.edu/xmlrpc/xmlrpc.html
>
> patch:
> http://aeolus.cit.cornell.edu/xmlrpc/interceptors-introspection.patch
>
> Aaron
>
> ----------
>
> Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 15:43:49 +0200
> From: matjaz.ostroversnik@zrs-tk.si
> To: rpc-user@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Sessions
>
> [The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set]
> [Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set]
> [Some characters may be displayed incorrectly]
>
> Hi Aron
>
> Could you update the patch to version xmlrpc-1.1 (from Apache).
> The patch you provided mostly fails.
>
>
>
>