old binaries

[Ask Bjoern Hansen <as...@develooper.com>]

in http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/linux/ we have 1.3.1,
1.3.6 and 1.3.9 binaries laying around.  Shouldn't we delete those?

It's the same for some of the other platforms too (aux, netbsd,
osf1, qnx, digitalunix, freebsd, irix, hpux, dgux, solaris even has
a 1.3.0!)

If we can't keep them up to date, maybe it would be best to just
dispose of it completly?


 - ask

-- 
ask bjoern hansen, http://askbjoernhansen.com/ !try; do();

Re: old binaries

[Ask Bjoern Hansen <as...@develooper.com>]

On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Thomas Eibner wrote:

> > If we can't keep them up to date, maybe it would be best to just
> > dispose of it completly?
>
> Nooooo. Why not just move them somewhere else? Although we already have
> a few copies of what is on the apache site for the history project.

binaries?  I can't see how binaries really could ever get very
interesting?

Right now we are just distributing insecure(?) executables to
unsuspecting users.

 - ask

-- 
ask bjoern hansen, http://askbjoernhansen.com/ !try; do();

Re: old binaries

[Thomas Eibner <th...@stderr.net>]

On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 01:55:10PM -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> 
> in http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/linux/ we have 1.3.1,
> 1.3.6 and 1.3.9 binaries laying around.  Shouldn't we delete those?
>
> It's the same for some of the other platforms too (aux, netbsd,
> osf1, qnx, digitalunix, freebsd, irix, hpux, dgux, solaris even has
> a 1.3.0!)
> 
> If we can't keep them up to date, maybe it would be best to just
> dispose of it completly?

Nooooo. Why not just move them somewhere else? Although we already have
a few copies of what is on the apache site for the history project.

-- 
  Thomas Eibner <http://thomas.eibner.dk/> DnsZone <http://dnszone.org/>
  mod_pointer <http://stderr.net/mod_pointer> <http://photos.eibner.dk/>
  !(C)<http://copywrong.dk/>                  <http://apachegallery.dk/>
          Putting the HEST in .COM <http://www.hestdesign.com/>