You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tajo.apache.org by Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> on 2014/09/16 17:00:10 UTC
0.9.0 release
Hi folks,
Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release,
I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
interesting news in Apache blog.
As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are
still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which
must be resolved in 0.9.0.
If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
Please feel free to suggest your idea.
Best regards,
Hyunsik
Re: 0.9.0 release
Posted by Jaehwa Jung <bl...@apache.org>.
+1
I also think that this is the moment for releasing 0.9.0.
Go ahead with your plan. :)
Cheers
Jaehwa
2014-09-17 0:00 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>:
> Hi folks,
>
> Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release,
> I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
> arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
>
> Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
> much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
> made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
> very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
> interesting news in Apache blog.
>
> As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
> release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are
> still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
> rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which
> must be resolved in 0.9.0.
>
> If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
> trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
>
> Please feel free to suggest your idea.
>
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik
>
Re: 0.9.0 release
Posted by Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>.
Hi guys,
To make maven jars and binary tarball, I've used release plugin.
During unit tests, I found some unit test failure, and I just created
the jira issue for it.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1111
But, even though I tried to reproduce it many times, I couldn't again.
I think that this bug seems to be trivial. It may be a kind of
concurrency bug. Nevertheless, we have to fix it before releasing.
I'll dig into this problem. I'll continue to prepare the release
candidate after I fix this bug.
Best regards,
Hyunsik
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Azuryy Yu <az...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Hyunsik.
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Finally, the master branch seems to be ready to be released as 0.9.0.
>>
>> The current remain issues already are patch available status and all
>> issues will be committed soon.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO/fixforversion/12325340
>>
>> After they are committed, I'll make the first 0.9.0 release candidate.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Hyunsik
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Here is the remain issues for 0.9.0 release.
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1071?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>> >
>> > Most of them are patch available.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> Most of remain issues scheduled to 0.9.0 are patch available. I think
>> >> that we can start 0.9.0 release process soon.
>> >>
>> >> - Hyunsik
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>> I've checked the user document of development version. Some pages are
>> >>> outdated. In addition to adding new docs, we need to update docs for
>> >>> 0.9.0 release.
>> >>>
>> >>> I've described what we need to update in
>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1052. It would be great if
>> >>> you guys take and resolve some of them.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Hyunsik
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> Hi folks,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I've rescheduled the remain issues which are not critical in 0.9.0.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The remain issues are as follows:
>> >>>> http://goo.gl/dJ9X9F
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If there are more issues which should be resolved in 0.9.0, feel free
>> >>>> to reschedule them.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>> Hyunsik
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>> Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation.
>> >>>>> Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features
>> >>>>> of all features that Tajo provide.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved
>> >>>>> the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also
>> >>>>> need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free
>> >>>>> to create new jira.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to
>> next version.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Best regards,
>> >>>>> Hyunsik
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <ji...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>> Hi guys,
>> >>>>>> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release.
>> >>>>>> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them
>> for future
>> >>>>>> releases.
>> >>>>>> Here is my +1.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that
>> it will
>> >>>>>> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example,
>> each of
>> >>>>>> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that
>> topic are
>> >>>>>> resolved.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>> Jihoon
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <ma...@gmail.com>:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hi,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and
>> complete
>> >>>>>>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice
>> if there
>> >>>>>>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Sincerely,
>> >>>>>>> Thanh
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> > I glanced the change note.
>> >>>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>> > It looks sufficient to get +1.
>> >>>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>> > Thanks.
>> >>>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <
>> hyunsik@apache.org>
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>> > > Hi folks,
>> >>>>>>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For
>> release,
>> >>>>>>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features
>> and
>> >>>>>>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that
>> again.
>> >>>>>>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and
>> made Tajo
>> >>>>>>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys
>> have
>> >>>>>>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as
>> production. I'm
>> >>>>>>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post
>> very
>> >>>>>>> > > interesting news in Apache blog.
>> >>>>>>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss
>> 0.9.0
>> >>>>>>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50
>> issues are
>> >>>>>>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them
>> can be
>> >>>>>>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical
>> issues which
>> >>>>>>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0.
>> >>>>>>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
>> >>>>>>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0
>> release.
>> >>>>>>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea.
>> >>>>>>> > > Best regards,
>> >>>>>>> > > Hyunsik
>> >>>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>>
>>
Re: 0.9.0 release
Posted by Azuryy Yu <az...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Hyunsik.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Finally, the master branch seems to be ready to be released as 0.9.0.
>
> The current remain issues already are patch available status and all
> issues will be committed soon.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO/fixforversion/12325340
>
> After they are committed, I'll make the first 0.9.0 release candidate.
>
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Here is the remain issues for 0.9.0 release.
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1071?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> >
> > Most of them are patch available.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> Most of remain issues scheduled to 0.9.0 are patch available. I think
> >> that we can start 0.9.0 release process soon.
> >>
> >> - Hyunsik
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>> I've checked the user document of development version. Some pages are
> >>> outdated. In addition to adding new docs, we need to update docs for
> >>> 0.9.0 release.
> >>>
> >>> I've described what we need to update in
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1052. It would be great if
> >>> you guys take and resolve some of them.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Hyunsik
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've rescheduled the remain issues which are not critical in 0.9.0.
> >>>>
> >>>> The remain issues are as follows:
> >>>> http://goo.gl/dJ9X9F
> >>>>
> >>>> If there are more issues which should be resolved in 0.9.0, feel free
> >>>> to reschedule them.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Hyunsik
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>> Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation.
> >>>>> Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features
> >>>>> of all features that Tajo provide.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved
> >>>>> the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also
> >>>>> need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free
> >>>>> to create new jira.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to
> next version.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>> Hyunsik
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <ji...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>>> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release.
> >>>>>> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them
> for future
> >>>>>> releases.
> >>>>>> Here is my +1.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that
> it will
> >>>>>> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example,
> each of
> >>>>>> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that
> topic are
> >>>>>> resolved.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Jihoon
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <ma...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and
> complete
> >>>>>>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice
> if there
> >>>>>>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sincerely,
> >>>>>>> Thanh
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> > I glanced the change note.
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > It looks sufficient to get +1.
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > Thanks.
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <
> hyunsik@apache.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > > Hi folks,
> >>>>>>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For
> release,
> >>>>>>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features
> and
> >>>>>>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that
> again.
> >>>>>>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and
> made Tajo
> >>>>>>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys
> have
> >>>>>>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as
> production. I'm
> >>>>>>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post
> very
> >>>>>>> > > interesting news in Apache blog.
> >>>>>>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss
> 0.9.0
> >>>>>>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50
> issues are
> >>>>>>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them
> can be
> >>>>>>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical
> issues which
> >>>>>>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0.
> >>>>>>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
> >>>>>>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0
> release.
> >>>>>>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea.
> >>>>>>> > > Best regards,
> >>>>>>> > > Hyunsik
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>
>
Re: 0.9.0 release
Posted by Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>.
Hi folks,
Finally, the master branch seems to be ready to be released as 0.9.0.
The current remain issues already are patch available status and all
issues will be committed soon.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO/fixforversion/12325340
After they are committed, I'll make the first 0.9.0 release candidate.
Best regards,
Hyunsik
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
> Here is the remain issues for 0.9.0 release.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1071?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
> Most of them are patch available.
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Most of remain issues scheduled to 0.9.0 are patch available. I think
>> that we can start 0.9.0 release process soon.
>>
>> - Hyunsik
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> I've checked the user document of development version. Some pages are
>>> outdated. In addition to adding new docs, we need to update docs for
>>> 0.9.0 release.
>>>
>>> I've described what we need to update in
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1052. It would be great if
>>> you guys take and resolve some of them.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hyunsik
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> I've rescheduled the remain issues which are not critical in 0.9.0.
>>>>
>>>> The remain issues are as follows:
>>>> http://goo.gl/dJ9X9F
>>>>
>>>> If there are more issues which should be resolved in 0.9.0, feel free
>>>> to reschedule them.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Hyunsik
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation.
>>>>> Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features
>>>>> of all features that Tajo provide.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved
>>>>> the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also
>>>>> need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free
>>>>> to create new jira.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to next version.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Hyunsik
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release.
>>>>>> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them for future
>>>>>> releases.
>>>>>> Here is my +1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that it will
>>>>>> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example, each of
>>>>>> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that topic are
>>>>>> resolved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Jihoon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <ma...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and complete
>>>>>>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice if there
>>>>>>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>> Thanh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > I glanced the change note.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > It looks sufficient to get +1.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Thanks.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > > Hi folks,
>>>>>>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release,
>>>>>>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
>>>>>>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
>>>>>>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
>>>>>>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
>>>>>>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
>>>>>>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
>>>>>>> > > interesting news in Apache blog.
>>>>>>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
>>>>>>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are
>>>>>>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
>>>>>>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which
>>>>>>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0.
>>>>>>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
>>>>>>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
>>>>>>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea.
>>>>>>> > > Best regards,
>>>>>>> > > Hyunsik
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
Re: 0.9.0 release
Posted by Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>.
Here is the remain issues for 0.9.0 release.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1071?jql=project%20%3D%20TAJO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
Most of them are patch available.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
> Most of remain issues scheduled to 0.9.0 are patch available. I think
> that we can start 0.9.0 release process soon.
>
> - Hyunsik
>
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I've checked the user document of development version. Some pages are
>> outdated. In addition to adding new docs, we need to update docs for
>> 0.9.0 release.
>>
>> I've described what we need to update in
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1052. It would be great if
>> you guys take and resolve some of them.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hyunsik
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> I've rescheduled the remain issues which are not critical in 0.9.0.
>>>
>>> The remain issues are as follows:
>>> http://goo.gl/dJ9X9F
>>>
>>> If there are more issues which should be resolved in 0.9.0, feel free
>>> to reschedule them.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hyunsik
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation.
>>>> Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features
>>>> of all features that Tajo provide.
>>>>
>>>> I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved
>>>> the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also
>>>> need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free
>>>> to create new jira.
>>>>
>>>> Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to next version.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Hyunsik
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release.
>>>>> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them for future
>>>>> releases.
>>>>> Here is my +1.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that it will
>>>>> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example, each of
>>>>> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that topic are
>>>>> resolved.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Jihoon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <ma...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and complete
>>>>>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice if there
>>>>>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>> Thanh
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > I glanced the change note.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > It looks sufficient to get +1.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > Hi folks,
>>>>>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release,
>>>>>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
>>>>>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
>>>>>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
>>>>>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
>>>>>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
>>>>>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
>>>>>> > > interesting news in Apache blog.
>>>>>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
>>>>>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are
>>>>>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
>>>>>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which
>>>>>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0.
>>>>>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
>>>>>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
>>>>>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea.
>>>>>> > > Best regards,
>>>>>> > > Hyunsik
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
Re: 0.9.0 release
Posted by Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>.
Most of remain issues scheduled to 0.9.0 are patch available. I think
that we can start 0.9.0 release process soon.
- Hyunsik
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've checked the user document of development version. Some pages are
> outdated. In addition to adding new docs, we need to update docs for
> 0.9.0 release.
>
> I've described what we need to update in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1052. It would be great if
> you guys take and resolve some of them.
>
> Thanks,
> Hyunsik
>
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've rescheduled the remain issues which are not critical in 0.9.0.
>>
>> The remain issues are as follows:
>> http://goo.gl/dJ9X9F
>>
>> If there are more issues which should be resolved in 0.9.0, feel free
>> to reschedule them.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hyunsik
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation.
>>> Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features
>>> of all features that Tajo provide.
>>>
>>> I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved
>>> the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also
>>> need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free
>>> to create new jira.
>>>
>>> Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to next version.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Hyunsik
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release.
>>>> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them for future
>>>> releases.
>>>> Here is my +1.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that it will
>>>> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example, each of
>>>> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that topic are
>>>> resolved.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jihoon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <ma...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and complete
>>>>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice if there
>>>>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>> Thanh
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > I glanced the change note.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It looks sufficient to get +1.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > Hi folks,
>>>>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release,
>>>>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
>>>>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
>>>>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
>>>>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
>>>>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
>>>>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
>>>>> > > interesting news in Apache blog.
>>>>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
>>>>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are
>>>>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
>>>>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which
>>>>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0.
>>>>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
>>>>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
>>>>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea.
>>>>> > > Best regards,
>>>>> > > Hyunsik
>>>>> >
>>>>>
Re: 0.9.0 release
Posted by Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>.
I've checked the user document of development version. Some pages are
outdated. In addition to adding new docs, we need to update docs for
0.9.0 release.
I've described what we need to update in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1052. It would be great if
you guys take and resolve some of them.
Thanks,
Hyunsik
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've rescheduled the remain issues which are not critical in 0.9.0.
>
> The remain issues are as follows:
> http://goo.gl/dJ9X9F
>
> If there are more issues which should be resolved in 0.9.0, feel free
> to reschedule them.
>
> Thanks,
> Hyunsik
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation.
>> Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features
>> of all features that Tajo provide.
>>
>> I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved
>> the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also
>> need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free
>> to create new jira.
>>
>> Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to next version.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Hyunsik
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release.
>>> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them for future
>>> releases.
>>> Here is my +1.
>>>
>>> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that it will
>>> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example, each of
>>> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that topic are
>>> resolved.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jihoon
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <ma...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and complete
>>>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice if there
>>>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> Thanh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > I glanced the change note.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > It looks sufficient to get +1.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks.
>>>> >
>>>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Hi folks,
>>>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release,
>>>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
>>>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
>>>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
>>>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
>>>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
>>>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
>>>> > > interesting news in Apache blog.
>>>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
>>>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are
>>>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
>>>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which
>>>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0.
>>>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
>>>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
>>>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea.
>>>> > > Best regards,
>>>> > > Hyunsik
>>>> >
>>>>
Re: 0.9.0 release
Posted by Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>.
Hi folks,
I've rescheduled the remain issues which are not critical in 0.9.0.
The remain issues are as follows:
http://goo.gl/dJ9X9F
If there are more issues which should be resolved in 0.9.0, feel free
to reschedule them.
Thanks,
Hyunsik
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation.
> Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features
> of all features that Tajo provide.
>
> I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved
> the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also
> need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free
> to create new jira.
>
> Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to next version.
>
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release.
>> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them for future
>> releases.
>> Here is my +1.
>>
>> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that it will
>> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example, each of
>> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that topic are
>> resolved.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jihoon
>>
>>
>> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <ma...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and complete
>>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice if there
>>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Thanh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I glanced the change note.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > It looks sufficient to get +1.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks.
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi folks,
>>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release,
>>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
>>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
>>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
>>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
>>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
>>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
>>> > > interesting news in Apache blog.
>>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
>>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are
>>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
>>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which
>>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0.
>>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
>>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
>>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea.
>>> > > Best regards,
>>> > > Hyunsik
>>> >
>>>
Re: 0.9.0 release
Posted by Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>.
Yes, I totally agree with you guys. We need to update documentation.
Actually, I expect that our documentation explains about 1/3 features
of all features that Tajo provide.
I've created the jira issue for 0.9.0 documentation, and I've moved
the jira issue from 0.8.0 documentation issue to new jira. We also
need to create more jira for new and updated documentation. Feel free
to create new jira.
Also, I'll reschedule some jira issues which are not critical to next version.
Best regards,
Hyunsik
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jihoon Son <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release.
> Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them for future
> releases.
> Here is my +1.
>
> Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that it will
> helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example, each of
> us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that topic are
> resolved.
>
> Thanks,
> Jihoon
>
>
> 2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <ma...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and complete
>> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice if there
>> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Thanh
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I glanced the change note.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > It looks sufficient to get +1.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi folks,
>> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release,
>> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
>> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
>> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
>> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
>> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
>> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
>> > > interesting news in Apache blog.
>> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
>> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are
>> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
>> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which
>> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0.
>> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
>> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
>> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea.
>> > > Best regards,
>> > > Hyunsik
>> >
>>
Re: 0.9.0 release
Posted by Jihoon Son <ji...@apache.org>.
Hi guys,
I happily agree on that we are ready for the next release.
Even though some issues are not resolved, we can reschedule them for future
releases.
Here is my +1.
Anyway, as Thanh said, we should update our documents. I think that it will
helpful for us to discuss the documentation progress. For example, each of
us can take a topic, and update documents when any issues on that topic are
resolved.
Thanks,
Jihoon
2014-09-18 9:14 GMT+09:00 Thanh Mai <ma...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and complete
> documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice if there
> will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects.
>
> Sincerely,
> Thanh
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I glanced the change note.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > It looks sufficient to get +1.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release,
> > > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
> > > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
> > > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
> > > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
> > > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
> > > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
> > > interesting news in Apache blog.
> > > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
> > > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are
> > > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
> > > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which
> > > must be resolved in 0.9.0.
> > > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
> > > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
> > > Please feel free to suggest your idea.
> > > Best regards,
> > > Hyunsik
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0 release
Posted by Thanh Mai <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I hope that the release 0.9.0 will come with more detailed and complete
documents, especially about what Tajo can do. It will also be nice if there
will be a performance comparison between Tajo and related projects.
Sincerely,
Thanh
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I glanced the change note.
>
>
>
>
> It looks sufficient to get +1.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> > Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release,
> > I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
> > arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
> > Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
> > much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
> > made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
> > very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
> > interesting news in Apache blog.
> > As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
> > release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are
> > still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
> > rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which
> > must be resolved in 0.9.0.
> > If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
> > trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
> > Please feel free to suggest your idea.
> > Best regards,
> > Hyunsik
>
Re: 0.9.0 release
Posted by em...@gmail.com.
I glanced the change note.
It looks sufficient to get +1.
Thanks.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Above all, I greatly apologize the miss of 0.8.1 release. For release,
> I had to spend not few time on refineing incomplete features and
> arranging some configs. I didn't do it. I'm sorry for that again.
> Besides, we have continued to contribute lots of codes and made Tajo
> much more stability. Especially, for several months, some guys have
> made much effort to deploy Tajo in some companies as production. I'm
> very happy and proud about that. Soon, we can officially post very
> interesting news in Apache blog.
> As a result, I think that now is the right time to discuss 0.9.0
> release. How about your think? Currently, even though 50 issues are
> still scheduled to 0.9.0 in Jira, I think that most of them can be
> rescheduled to next version. There are only few critical issues which
> must be resolved in 0.9.0.
> If you are all agree with my suggestion, I'd like to reschedule
> trivial issues in 0.9.0. I'd like to start work for 0.9.0 release.
> Please feel free to suggest your idea.
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik