You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@tuscany.apache.org by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> on 2007/09/05 23:20:40 UTC
Re: How is Tuscany currently being used?
Thanks a lot for sharing this. It helps us and everybody on the list to
understand how Tuscany is used out there!
What do people think about creating a page on the Tuscany Wiki where
Tuscany users could document their usage scenarios?
Anderson, Jeff T (CA - Toronto) wrote:
> Just wondering if anybody out there on the list could provide some comments on how they are using Tuscany with in their organization or are planning to within the foreseeable future?
> It would be great to get an understanding of whether anybody plans to use Tuscany in production within the foreseeable timeframe, are merely evaluating it for various prototypes, are currently looking at it for high-level research. Getting a high-level understanding of what kinds and solutions are trying to be solved with Tuscany would be great also. Providing this kind of information IMHO would really help to give a sense of how people are envisioning the use of Tuscany and how/when people are considering Tuscany to be used as a product that is ready for "prime time use", like spring, and other ubiquitous open-source products.
>
> As an example of the kind of information that I think would be beneficial to many on the list I will go first.
>
>
> Currently working for a consulting firm with a major financial services Institute in Canada to implement a mix of retail and commercial banking services. We plan to go into production by the end of this quarter, we have finished the majority of implementation, conducted functional and performance testing (with very good results) and plan to do a limited deployment with a small subset of users within a couple of months. We are currently deploying Tuscany on websphere 6.1, Solaris 10, and taking advantage of a combination of Web services bindings/SDO as well as local/spring bindings. An interesting wrinkle is that we are also basing all of our service interfaces on the IFX banking standard, which breaks SDO in a couple of places.
>
> Thanks in advance for sharing
>
> regards
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-user-help@ws.apache.org