You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@continuum.apache.org by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> on 2010/01/12 07:02:24 UTC
Release Continuum 1.3.5
Hi all,
I think it's time to do a Continuum 1.3.5
Here are the issues fixed:
* [CONTINUUM-2207] - Missing value for key 'scmResult' if build group
project
* [CONTINUUM-2318] - NPE when adding Ant/Shell Projects
* [CONTINUUM-2322] - Unable to release project using distributed build if
<scm> is not configured in the project's pom
* [CONTINUUM-2348] - Wrong subject in Mail Notification when distributed
build is enabled
* [CONTINUUM-2350] - Part of an added project's scm url is cut off
* [CONTINUUM-2355] - {project.projectGroup.name} in prepare build
notification subject
* [CONTINUUM-2356] - Build order is not correct when distributed build is
enabled
* [CONTINUUM-2357] - Release perform error when removing M2_HOME from path
* [CONTINUUM-2367] - The current build result is displayed when viewing
build results with distributed builds enabled.
* [CONTINUUM-2377] - Build agents are not stored in continuum.xml
* [CONTINUUM-2379] - document that tags are not rolled back in a release
rollback
* [CONTINUUM-2387] - Members tab does not show the members correctly
* [CONTINUUM-2388] - Editing a build definition should use POST instead of
GET
* [CONTINUUM-2394] - Current build result link is wrong with distributed
build enabled
* [CONTINUUM-2411] - IndexOutOfBoundsException in
DefaultContinuum.executeAddProjectsFromMetadataActivity
* [CONTINUUM-2419] - Unable to build multiple independent projects in the
same project group when distributed build is enabled
* [CONTINUUM-1031] - Delete project performance is bad
* [CONTINUUM-2353] - Make it clearer in the documentation how Local
Repositories need to be configured in Distributed Builds
* [CONTINUUM-2365] - Provide a default configuration file for the
distributed build agent
* [CONTINUUM-2380] - Clarify Description of Build Agent Attributes
* [CONTINUUM-2363] - Missing documentation for 'Arguments' field on release
perform
* [CONTINUUM-2374] - Configure code coverage for 1.3.x branch and trunk
* [CONTINUUM-2414] - need to document changes to wrapper.conf on upgrade
Any objections?
Thanks,
--
Marica
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
Sorry missed that one :)
Thanks,
--
Marica
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> Checking with infra, since I see it through the proxy and not on the live
> site.
>
> BTW, I Think you forgot to update the home page?
>
> - Brett
>
> On 20/01/2010, at 10:03 AM, Marica Tan wrote:
>
> > I already published the site and the reference docs yesterday (mvn
> > site-deply both on the release tag and the continuum site) but when I
> > visited the following links, I don't see any changes at all.
> >
> > http://continuum.apache.org/
> > http://continuum.apache.org/docs/1.3.5
> >
> >
> > Can anyone help me with this :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Marica
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> The vote has passed with the following results:
> >>
> >> +1s 3 binding: Wendy, Brett, Marica
> >> 1 non-binding: Brent
> >> No -1s and 0s
> >>
> >>
> >> I'll finalize the release.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --
> >> Marica
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 for Beta.
> >>>
> >>> - verified signatures and checksums
> >>> - tried simple build/release both in a distributed and non-distributed
> >>> build scenarios
> >>>
> >>> - Marica
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 for Beta.
> >>>>
> >>>> I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures). I
> was
> >>>> able to run and build a project.
> >>>>
> >>>> I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box -
> >>>> possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review this
> before
> >>>> a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Brett
> >>>>
> >>>> On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release
> >>>> notes
> >>>>> here:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641
> >>>>>
> >>>>> While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums,
> >>>> can be
> >>>>> downloaded here:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <
> >>>>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <
> >>>>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <
> >>>>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Marica
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I'll start the release today :-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
> >>>>>>> <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop
> me
> >>>>>>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a
> problem
> >>>>>>> there too.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA
> >>>>>>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's
> already
> >>>>>>> been four months since 1.3.4.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3
> >>>>>>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be
> the
> >>>>>>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Wendy
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Brett Porter
> >>>> brett@apache.org
> >>>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
Checking with infra, since I see it through the proxy and not on the live site.
BTW, I Think you forgot to update the home page?
- Brett
On 20/01/2010, at 10:03 AM, Marica Tan wrote:
> I already published the site and the reference docs yesterday (mvn
> site-deply both on the release tag and the continuum site) but when I
> visited the following links, I don't see any changes at all.
>
> http://continuum.apache.org/
> http://continuum.apache.org/docs/1.3.5
>
>
> Can anyone help me with this :)
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Marica
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The vote has passed with the following results:
>>
>> +1s 3 binding: Wendy, Brett, Marica
>> 1 non-binding: Brent
>> No -1s and 0s
>>
>>
>> I'll finalize the release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Marica
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for Beta.
>>>
>>> - verified signatures and checksums
>>> - tried simple build/release both in a distributed and non-distributed
>>> build scenarios
>>>
>>> - Marica
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for Beta.
>>>>
>>>> I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures). I was
>>>> able to run and build a project.
>>>>
>>>> I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box -
>>>> possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review this before
>>>> a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO.
>>>>
>>>> - Brett
>>>>
>>>> On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
>>>>>
>>>>> This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release
>>>> notes
>>>>> here:
>>>>>
>>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641
>>>>>
>>>>> While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums,
>>>> can be
>>>>> downloaded here:
>>>>>
>>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
>>>>>
>>>>> <
>>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
>>>>>
>>>>> <
>>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
>>>>>
>>>>> <
>>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/
>>>>>
>>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> --
>>>>> Marica
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll start the release today :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
>>>>>>> <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me
>>>>>>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on
>>>> the
>>>>>>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem
>>>>>>> there too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA
>>>>>>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already
>>>>>>> been four months since 1.3.4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3
>>>>>>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the
>>>>>>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Wendy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Brett Porter
>>>> brett@apache.org
>>>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
I already published the site and the reference docs yesterday (mvn
site-deply both on the release tag and the continuum site) but when I
visited the following links, I don't see any changes at all.
http://continuum.apache.org/
http://continuum.apache.org/docs/1.3.5
Can anyone help me with this :)
Thanks,
--
Marica
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The vote has passed with the following results:
>
> +1s 3 binding: Wendy, Brett, Marica
> 1 non-binding: Brent
> No -1s and 0s
>
>
> I'll finalize the release.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Marica
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 for Beta.
>>
>> - verified signatures and checksums
>> - tried simple build/release both in a distributed and non-distributed
>> build scenarios
>>
>> - Marica
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for Beta.
>>>
>>> I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures). I was
>>> able to run and build a project.
>>>
>>> I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box -
>>> possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review this before
>>> a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO.
>>>
>>> - Brett
>>>
>>> On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi
>>> >
>>> > The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
>>> >
>>> > This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release
>>> notes
>>> > here:
>>> >
>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641
>>> >
>>> > While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums,
>>> can be
>>> > downloaded here:
>>> >
>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
>>> >
>>> > <
>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
>>> >
>>> > <
>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
>>> >
>>> > <
>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/
>>> >
>>> > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
>>> >
>>> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > --
>>> > Marica
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I'll start the release today :-)
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
>>> >>> <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me
>>> >>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on
>>> the
>>> >>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem
>>> >>> there too.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA
>>> >>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already
>>> >>> been four months since 1.3.4.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3
>>> >>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the
>>> >>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Wendy
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Brett Porter
>>> brett@apache.org
>>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Deng Ching <oc...@apache.org>.
Get well soon Emm! :)
-Deng
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Emmanuel Venisse <
emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > No problem.
> >
> > Hope you're feeling better now :)
> >
>
> Yep, but it isn't easy to stay on a chair with broken ribs :-)
>
> Emmanuel
>
> >
> > --
> > Marica
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Emmanuel Venisse <
> > emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Marica for this release.
> > > I'm sorry I couldn't test and vote for it because I was at hospital.
> > >
> > > Emmanuel
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > The vote has passed with the following results:
> > > >
> > > > +1s 3 binding: Wendy, Brett, Marica
> > > > 1 non-binding: Brent
> > > > No -1s and 0s
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'll finalize the release.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > --
> > > > Marica
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for Beta.
> > > > >
> > > > > - verified signatures and checksums
> > > > > - tried simple build/release both in a distributed and
> > non-distributed
> > > > > build scenarios
> > > > >
> > > > > - Marica
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> +1 for Beta.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I built the from the source bundle (after checking the
> signatures).
> > I
> > > > was
> > > > >> able to run and build a project.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box
> -
> > > > >> possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review
> > this
> > > > before
> > > > >> a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> - Brett
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Hi
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the
> release
> > > > notes
> > > > >> > here:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and
> > checksums,
> > > > can
> > > > >> be
> > > > >> > downloaded here:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > <
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > <
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > <
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > >> > --
> > > > >> > Marica
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <
> marica.tan@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >> I'll start the release today :-)
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <
> wsmoak@gmail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
> > > > >> >>> <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would
> > stop
> > > > me
> > > > >> >>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try
> it
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > >> >>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a
> > > problem
> > > > >> >>> there too.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a
> > GA
> > > > >> >>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's
> > > already
> > > > >> >>> been four months since 1.3.4.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick
> (2-3
> > > > >> >>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would
> > be
> > > > the
> > > > >> >>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> --
> > > > >> >>> Wendy
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Brett Porter
> > > > >> brett@apache.org
> > > > >> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No problem.
>
> Hope you're feeling better now :)
>
Yep, but it isn't easy to stay on a chair with broken ribs :-)
Emmanuel
>
> --
> Marica
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Emmanuel Venisse <
> emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Marica for this release.
> > I'm sorry I couldn't test and vote for it because I was at hospital.
> >
> > Emmanuel
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > The vote has passed with the following results:
> > >
> > > +1s 3 binding: Wendy, Brett, Marica
> > > 1 non-binding: Brent
> > > No -1s and 0s
> > >
> > >
> > > I'll finalize the release.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --
> > > Marica
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for Beta.
> > > >
> > > > - verified signatures and checksums
> > > > - tried simple build/release both in a distributed and
> non-distributed
> > > > build scenarios
> > > >
> > > > - Marica
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 for Beta.
> > > >>
> > > >> I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures).
> I
> > > was
> > > >> able to run and build a project.
> > > >>
> > > >> I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box -
> > > >> possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review
> this
> > > before
> > > >> a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO.
> > > >>
> > > >> - Brett
> > > >>
> > > >> On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release
> > > notes
> > > >> > here:
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641
> > > >> >
> > > >> > While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and
> checksums,
> > > can
> > > >> be
> > > >> > downloaded here:
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
> > > >> >
> > > >> > <
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
> > > >> >
> > > >> > <
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
> > > >> >
> > > >> > <
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Marica
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <marica.tan@gmail.com
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> I'll start the release today :-)
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
> > > >> >>> <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> >>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would
> stop
> > > me
> > > >> >>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it
> on
> > > the
> > > >> >>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a
> > problem
> > > >> >>> there too.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a
> GA
> > > >> >>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's
> > already
> > > >> >>> been four months since 1.3.4.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3
> > > >> >>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would
> be
> > > the
> > > >> >>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> --
> > > >> >>> Wendy
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Brett Porter
> > > >> brett@apache.org
> > > >> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
No problem.
Hope you're feeling better now :)
--
Marica
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Emmanuel Venisse <
emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Marica for this release.
> I'm sorry I couldn't test and vote for it because I was at hospital.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The vote has passed with the following results:
> >
> > +1s 3 binding: Wendy, Brett, Marica
> > 1 non-binding: Brent
> > No -1s and 0s
> >
> >
> > I'll finalize the release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Marica
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for Beta.
> > >
> > > - verified signatures and checksums
> > > - tried simple build/release both in a distributed and non-distributed
> > > build scenarios
> > >
> > > - Marica
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 for Beta.
> > >>
> > >> I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures). I
> > was
> > >> able to run and build a project.
> > >>
> > >> I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box -
> > >> possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review this
> > before
> > >> a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO.
> > >>
> > >> - Brett
> > >>
> > >> On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi
> > >> >
> > >> > The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
> > >> >
> > >> > This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release
> > notes
> > >> > here:
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641
> > >> >
> > >> > While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums,
> > can
> > >> be
> > >> > downloaded here:
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
> > >> >
> > >> > <
> > >>
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
> > >> >
> > >> > <
> > >>
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
> > >> >
> > >> > <
> > >>
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/
> > >> >
> > >> > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
> > >> >
> > >> > [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
> > >> >
> > >> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > --
> > >> > Marica
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> I'll start the release today :-)
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
> > >> >>> <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop
> > me
> > >> >>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on
> > the
> > >> >>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a
> problem
> > >> >>> there too.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA
> > >> >>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's
> already
> > >> >>> been four months since 1.3.4.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3
> > >> >>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be
> > the
> > >> >>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> --
> > >> >>> Wendy
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Brett Porter
> > >> brett@apache.org
> > >> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Marica for this release.
I'm sorry I couldn't test and vote for it because I was at hospital.
Emmanuel
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The vote has passed with the following results:
>
> +1s 3 binding: Wendy, Brett, Marica
> 1 non-binding: Brent
> No -1s and 0s
>
>
> I'll finalize the release.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Marica
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for Beta.
> >
> > - verified signatures and checksums
> > - tried simple build/release both in a distributed and non-distributed
> > build scenarios
> >
> > - Marica
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 for Beta.
> >>
> >> I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures). I
> was
> >> able to run and build a project.
> >>
> >> I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box -
> >> possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review this
> before
> >> a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO.
> >>
> >> - Brett
> >>
> >> On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
> >> >
> >> > This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release
> notes
> >> > here:
> >> >
> >>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641
> >> >
> >> > While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums,
> can
> >> be
> >> > downloaded here:
> >> >
> >>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
> >> >
> >> > <
> >>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
> >> >
> >> > <
> >>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
> >> >
> >> > <
> >>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/
> >> >
> >> > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
> >> >
> >> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > --
> >> > Marica
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I'll start the release today :-)
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
> >> >>> <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop
> me
> >> >>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on
> the
> >> >>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem
> >> >>> there too.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA
> >> >>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already
> >> >>> been four months since 1.3.4.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3
> >> >>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be
> the
> >> >>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> Wendy
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Brett Porter
> >> brett@apache.org
> >> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
The vote has passed with the following results:
+1s 3 binding: Wendy, Brett, Marica
1 non-binding: Brent
No -1s and 0s
I'll finalize the release.
Thanks,
--
Marica
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for Beta.
>
> - verified signatures and checksums
> - tried simple build/release both in a distributed and non-distributed
> build scenarios
>
> - Marica
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 for Beta.
>>
>> I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures). I was
>> able to run and build a project.
>>
>> I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box -
>> possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review this before
>> a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO.
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>> On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote:
>>
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
>> >
>> > This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release notes
>> > here:
>> >
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641
>> >
>> > While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, can
>> be
>> > downloaded here:
>> >
>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
>> >
>> > <
>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
>> >
>> >
>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
>> >
>> > <
>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
>> >
>> >
>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
>> >
>> > <
>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
>> >
>> >
>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/
>> >
>> > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
>> >
>> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > --
>> > Marica
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'll start the release today :-)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
>> >>> <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
>> >>>
>> >>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me
>> >>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on the
>> >>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem
>> >>> there too.
>> >>>
>> >>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA
>> >>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
>> >>>
>> >>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already
>> >>> been four months since 1.3.4.
>> >>>
>> >>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3
>> >>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the
>> >>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Wendy
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> --
>> Brett Porter
>> brett@apache.org
>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 for Beta.
- verified signatures and checksums
- tried simple build/release both in a distributed and non-distributed build
scenarios
- Marica
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 for Beta.
>
> I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures). I was
> able to run and build a project.
>
> I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box -
> possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review this before
> a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO.
>
> - Brett
>
> On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
> >
> > This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release notes
> > here:
> >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641
> >
> > While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, can
> be
> > downloaded here:
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
> >
> > <
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
> >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
> >
> > <
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
> >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
> >
> > <
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
> >
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/
> >
> > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Marica
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I'll start the release today :-)
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
> >>> <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
> >>>
> >>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me
> >>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on the
> >>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem
> >>> there too.
> >>>
> >>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA
> >>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
> >>>
> >>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already
> >>> been four months since 1.3.4.
> >>>
> >>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3
> >>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the
> >>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Wendy
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
+1 for Beta.
I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures). I was able to run and build a project.
I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box - possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review this before a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO.
- Brett
On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote:
> Hi
>
> The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
>
> This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release notes
> here:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641
>
> While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, can be
> downloaded here:
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
>
> <http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
>
> <http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
>
> <http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/
>
> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
>
> [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Marica
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'll start the release today :-)
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
>>> <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
>>>
>>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me
>>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on the
>>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem
>>> there too.
>>>
>>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA
>>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
>>>
>>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already
>>> been four months since 1.3.4.
>>>
>>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3
>>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the
>>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Wendy
>>>
>>
>>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
On 15/01/2010, at 10:41 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> It seems I just missed the release train with my documentation
> improvements. Sorry about that.
It'll give us a good reason to turn around 1.3.6 quickly with just the few remaining issues :)
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>.
It seems I just missed the release train with my documentation
improvements. Sorry about that.
Marica Tan wrote:
> Hi
>
> The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
>
> This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release notes
> here:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641
>
> While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, can be
> downloaded here:
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
>
> <http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
>
> <http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
>
> <http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/
>
> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
>
> [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Marica
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'll start the release today :-)
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
>>> <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
>>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me
>>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on the
>>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem
>>> there too.
>>>
>>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA
>>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
>>>
>>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already
>>> been four months since 1.3.4.
>>>
>>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3
>>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the
>>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Wendy
>>>
>>
>
--
Dennis Lundberg
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The files are staged here
> http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.3.5
>
> The site is staged here:
> http://people.apache.org/~ctan/staging-sites/continuum/1.3.5/
+1 for Beta quality
I tested the Jetty bundle on OS X with basic configuration, and
verified the signatures/checksums on the distributions.
(Please let us know what you're testing so we can fill in any gaps.
Looks like Brent took the war file for a spin on Tomcat (thanks!) so
distributed build still needs a run through.)
I'm hoping for a quick GA release with:
- confirmation of a smooth upgrade path from prior versions
- site improvement (thanks Dennis!)
- maybe complete i18n if we have some patches to apply?
(The issue I called out earlier seems to be working as designed [only
one build tool allowed per build environment] and just needs
clarification in the docs.)
There seems to be something wrong with the staged site. It should
look like this: http://continuum.apache.org/docs/1.3.4/
--
Wendy
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
The files are staged here
http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.3.5
The site is staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~ctan/staging-sites/continuum/1.3.5/
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, can
> be
> > downloaded here:
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
>
> Can you please stage the files as they will be put on the mirrors?
> Like this: http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.3.1/
>
> And the documentation also? Maybe we should add that feature to Archiva.
> :)
>
> I gather the release process has changed since it's now staged on
> vmbuild, and http://continuum.apache.org/development/release.html
> needs updating.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Wendy
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, can be
> downloaded here:
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
Can you please stage the files as they will be put on the mirrors?
Like this: http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.3.1/
And the documentation also? Maybe we should add that feature to Archiva. :)
I gather the release process has changed since it's now staged on
vmbuild, and http://continuum.apache.org/development/release.html
needs updating.
Thanks,
--
Wendy
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Brent Atkinson <ba...@usm.maine.edu>.
>From what I can tell 1.3.5 standalone on Tomcat (with archiva-shared user database) seems to be working ok, using non-distributed, serial build queue. Upgrade went ok too.
+1
>>> Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> 1/13/2010 2:36 AM >>>
Hi
The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release notes
here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641
While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, can be
downloaded here:
http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
<http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/>
http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
<http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/>
http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
<http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/>
http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/
Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
[ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
The vote will be open for 72 hours.
Thanks,
--
Marica
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll start the release today :-)
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
>> <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
>>
>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me
>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on the
>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem
>> there too.
>>
>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA
>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
>>
>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already
>> been four months since 1.3.4.
>>
>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3
>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the
>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
>>
>> --
>> Wendy
>>
>
>
[vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi
The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release notes
here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641
While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, can be
downloaded here:
http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
<http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/>
http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
<http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/>
http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
<http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/>
http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/
Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
[ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
The vote will be open for 72 hours.
Thanks,
--
Marica
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll start the release today :-)
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
>> <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
>>
>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me
>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on the
>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem
>> there too.
>>
>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA
>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
>>
>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already
>> been four months since 1.3.4.
>>
>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3
>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the
>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
>>
>> --
>> Wendy
>>
>
>
Re: Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
I'll start the release today :-)
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
> <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
>
> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me
> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on the
> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem
> there too.
>
> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA
> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
>
> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already
> been four months since 1.3.4.
>
> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3
> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the
> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
>
> --
> Wendy
>
Re: Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
<em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me
from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on the
branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem
there too.
A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA
release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already
been four months since 1.3.4.
Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3
weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the
way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
--
Wendy
Re: Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
No, we still need to fix 2338 (if it's a bug) in 1.3.6
--
Marica
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Emmanuel Venisse <
emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I think it's time to do a Continuum 1.3.5
> >
> > Here are the issues fixed:
> >
> > * [CONTINUUM-2207] - Missing value for key 'scmResult' if build group
> > project
> > * [CONTINUUM-2318] - NPE when adding Ant/Shell Projects
> > * [CONTINUUM-2322] - Unable to release project using distributed build if
> > <scm> is not configured in the project's pom
> > * [CONTINUUM-2348] - Wrong subject in Mail Notification when distributed
> > build is enabled
> > * [CONTINUUM-2350] - Part of an added project's scm url is cut off
> > * [CONTINUUM-2355] - {project.projectGroup.name} in prepare build
> > notification subject
> > * [CONTINUUM-2356] - Build order is not correct when distributed build is
> > enabled
> > * [CONTINUUM-2357] - Release perform error when removing M2_HOME from
> path
> > * [CONTINUUM-2367] - The current build result is displayed when viewing
> > build results with distributed builds enabled.
> > * [CONTINUUM-2377] - Build agents are not stored in continuum.xml
> > * [CONTINUUM-2379] - document that tags are not rolled back in a release
> > rollback
> > * [CONTINUUM-2387] - Members tab does not show the members correctly
> > * [CONTINUUM-2388] - Editing a build definition should use POST instead
> of
> > GET
> > * [CONTINUUM-2394] - Current build result link is wrong with distributed
> > build enabled
> > * [CONTINUUM-2411] - IndexOutOfBoundsException in
> > DefaultContinuum.executeAddProjectsFromMetadataActivity
> > * [CONTINUUM-2419] - Unable to build multiple independent projects in the
> > same project group when distributed build is enabled
> > * [CONTINUUM-1031] - Delete project performance is bad
> > * [CONTINUUM-2353] - Make it clearer in the documentation how Local
> > Repositories need to be configured in Distributed Builds
> > * [CONTINUUM-2365] - Provide a default configuration file for the
> > distributed build agent
> > * [CONTINUUM-2380] - Clarify Description of Build Agent Attributes
> > * [CONTINUUM-2363] - Missing documentation for 'Arguments' field on
> release
> > perform
> > * [CONTINUUM-2374] - Configure code coverage for 1.3.x branch and trunk
> > * [CONTINUUM-2414] - need to document changes to wrapper.conf on upgrade
> >
> > Any objections?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Marica
> >
>
Re: Release Continuum 1.3.5
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>.
Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
Emmanuel
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think it's time to do a Continuum 1.3.5
>
> Here are the issues fixed:
>
> * [CONTINUUM-2207] - Missing value for key 'scmResult' if build group
> project
> * [CONTINUUM-2318] - NPE when adding Ant/Shell Projects
> * [CONTINUUM-2322] - Unable to release project using distributed build if
> <scm> is not configured in the project's pom
> * [CONTINUUM-2348] - Wrong subject in Mail Notification when distributed
> build is enabled
> * [CONTINUUM-2350] - Part of an added project's scm url is cut off
> * [CONTINUUM-2355] - {project.projectGroup.name} in prepare build
> notification subject
> * [CONTINUUM-2356] - Build order is not correct when distributed build is
> enabled
> * [CONTINUUM-2357] - Release perform error when removing M2_HOME from path
> * [CONTINUUM-2367] - The current build result is displayed when viewing
> build results with distributed builds enabled.
> * [CONTINUUM-2377] - Build agents are not stored in continuum.xml
> * [CONTINUUM-2379] - document that tags are not rolled back in a release
> rollback
> * [CONTINUUM-2387] - Members tab does not show the members correctly
> * [CONTINUUM-2388] - Editing a build definition should use POST instead of
> GET
> * [CONTINUUM-2394] - Current build result link is wrong with distributed
> build enabled
> * [CONTINUUM-2411] - IndexOutOfBoundsException in
> DefaultContinuum.executeAddProjectsFromMetadataActivity
> * [CONTINUUM-2419] - Unable to build multiple independent projects in the
> same project group when distributed build is enabled
> * [CONTINUUM-1031] - Delete project performance is bad
> * [CONTINUUM-2353] - Make it clearer in the documentation how Local
> Repositories need to be configured in Distributed Builds
> * [CONTINUUM-2365] - Provide a default configuration file for the
> distributed build agent
> * [CONTINUUM-2380] - Clarify Description of Build Agent Attributes
> * [CONTINUUM-2363] - Missing documentation for 'Arguments' field on release
> perform
> * [CONTINUUM-2374] - Configure code coverage for 1.3.x branch and trunk
> * [CONTINUUM-2414] - need to document changes to wrapper.conf on upgrade
>
> Any objections?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Marica
>