Re: mod_watchdog API, was Re: svn commit: r759751 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/cluster/mod_heartbeat.c

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

On Mar 30, 2009, at 5:22 AM, Paul Querna wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>  
> wrote:
>> Paul Querna wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Paul Querna <pa...@querna.org>  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Inside a MPM that does it natively, just use the registered list of
>>> providers, and implement the same behavoirs as the module.
>>>
>>
>> The problem with mpm is that (IIRC the proposal) it uses
>> the current free resource. However if busy there will be no
>> resources available. So the solution is to dedicate a
>> separate resource for watchdog thread(s). Now, that's a
>> plain duplicate of mod_watchdog copied across the mpms.
>
> fine, disagree with that, but what are your thoughts on switching to
> the provider API?
>

+1 to provider... it's one of the best parts of httpd

Re: mod_watchdog API, was Re: svn commit: r759751 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/cluster/mod_heartbeat.c

[Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>]

Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
>>
>> fine, disagree with that, but what are your thoughts on switching to
>> the provider API?
>>
> 
> +1 to provider... it's one of the best parts of httpd
> 

But it uses the provider already :)

Regards
-- 
^(TM)