[Triplesec] High-availability/failover solution needed

[Maxim Sheremet <ma...@gmail.com>]

Hello everybody,

I have setup Triplesec on a single server. But it is now a single point of 
failure. So I need some high-availability/failover solution. I found some 
allusions to Triplesec high availability. Here is a quotation from 
http://directory.apache.org/apacheds/1.5/mitosis-functionnal-abstract.html :

"Systems which need MM replications, like triplesec, suppose that the 
replication is done on the fly"

So I assume there is some solution for Triplesec high availability. But I can 
not find any further info. And my question is:

Are there any manuals/docs/tips/hints I can use to provide high availability 
for Triplesec server.

Any help is appreciated.

My server details:
# uname -a

Re: [Triplesec] High-availability/failover solution needed

[Kiran Ayyagari <ay...@gmail.com>]

Hello Maxim,

         Currently we are working on fixing the broken replication system
which will be
         available in the 2.0 vesion of Apache Directory Server.

         Please watch this ML for possible updates about replication
subsystem.
--
Kiran Ayyagari

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Maxim Sheremet <ma...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello everybody,
>
> I have setup Triplesec on a single server. But it is now a single point of
> failure. So I need some high-availability/failover solution. I found some
> allusions to Triplesec high availability. Here is a quotation from
> http://directory.apache.org/apacheds/1.5/mitosis-functionnal-abstract.html:
>
> "Systems which need MM replications, like triplesec, suppose that the
> replication is done on the fly"
>
> So I assume there is some solution for Triplesec high availability. But I
> can
> not find any further info. And my question is:
>
> Are there any manuals/docs/tips/hints I can use to provide high
> availability
> for Triplesec server.
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> My server details:
> # uname -a
>