You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Jukka Zitting (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/11/13 18:07:22 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-1178) MutableTree#isNew: replace
implementation by NodeBuilder#isNew
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13821535#comment-13821535 ]
Jukka Zitting edited comment on OAK-1178 at 11/13/13 5:06 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
bq. simplified version
Yes, that definitely makes sense. I think the current {{isNew()}} code dates back to the time before we had the {{exists()}} mechanism, which makes it so convoluted.
was (Author: jukkaz):
bq: simplified version
Yes, that definitely makes sense. I think the current {{isNew()}} code dates back to the time before we had the {{exists()}} mechanism, which makes it so convoluted.
> MutableTree#isNew: replace implementation by NodeBuilder#isNew
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-1178
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1178
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: angela
> Assignee: Jukka Zitting
> Fix For: 0.12
>
> Attachments: OAK-1178.patch
>
>
> Similar to the issue described in OAK-1177 we may consider replacing the implementation of MutableTree#isNew by the corresponding call on the NodeBuilder.
> See also OAK-947.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)